Media Analysis

U.S. should have assassinated Khomeini in France in ’79 — and other not-so-friendly advice from Israelis

As Joe Biden pushes for a U.S. withdrawal from endless wars in the Middle East and says he wants to restore the Iran deal, the alarm bells are going off for Israel and its friends. They look on Iran as an existential enemy, or in any case as a good distraction from the Palestinian issue, and as always, they want the U.S. to confront Iran militarily.

Mike Pompeo now accuses the Biden administration of a policy of “appeasement” of Iran. Pompeo has been cultivating donors with an eye to running for president in 2024, and issuing apocalyptic pronouncements about the destruction of Israel is his political lane. He lately spoke at the neoconservative Hudson Institute and has claimed that Al-Qaeda has found a home in Iran — which was of course one false pretext for the invasion of Iraq that worked out so well for the U.S.

Next week Pompeo will be accepting an award for “Peace through Strength” at former Trump ambassador David Friedman’s new organization in Jerusalem. Pompeo shared his complex, subtle thoughts about the Iranian regime with Jewish Insider:

They are on a religious jihad for the destruction of the State of Israel and the big devil [the U.S.] as well. The leaders are evil.

Of course this talk is not extreme in Israel, it is typical of the politics. Here are two advice columns from Israel advocates that should make the hair stand up on your neck– and one of them was published by a liberal Zionist organization.

In a display of arrogance and amorality, Yossi Alpher, the weekly political/security analyst at Americans for Peace Now, says that the U.S. or Israel should have assassinated the Ayatollah Khomeini in France back in 1979 when it had a supposed chance to preserve the Shah’s rule in Iran.

The hardboiled Alpher begins by deploring the supposed American “intelligence failure” over the collapse of the regime in Afghanistan and expresses the fear that American intelligence agencies will miss the “evolution of Iran’s nuclear program.”

Alpher, 79, then moves on to his war stories and the “intelligence failure” of not killing Khomeini when we all had a chance.

In 1978-79 I was the Mossad’s Iran analyst. In late January 1979 the Head of the Mossad, General [Yitzhak] Hofi, called me to his office and informed me that the caretaker head of the Shah’s government in Tehran, Shapour Bakhtiar, had asked us to assassinate Khomeini, then still in exile in France. “I oppose political assassinations,” Hofi told me. “But the stakes are very high, so leave that aside for a moment. What’s your response to this request?”

I thought for a long moment, running various scenarios through my head, then said, “We don’t know enough about Khomeini for me to have an informed opinion.” Discussion over. The rest is history. The Islamic Republic that was founded so brutally by Khomeini within weeks now casts a long shadow over the entire Middle East. I have relived that moment of Intelligence failure again and again ever since. So have my contemporaries from the CIA and British MI6, who had a similar experience.

This commentary is not just immoral, it is foolish. The Iranian people rose in some of the biggest demonstrations history had ever witnessed to push the corrupt Shah out of power in 1979. Does Alpher really think that the U.S. or Israel could have retarded that social movement by killing someone in France?

The arrogance doesn’t end. Alpher goes on to call for an Israeli spying regime across Africa and Asia to prop up dictatorships.

In my book, Periphery: Israel’s Search for Middle East Allies, I analyzed Israel’s 1979 Iran Intelligence failure and suggested that Israel should, without ruffling any feathers and assuming the stakes are high, find under-the-radar ways to gather serious intelligence regarding opposition activities that might endanger friendly yet dictatorial regimes — the kind that would not tolerate their friends openly spying on them — in parts of Asia and Africa.

And you wonder why Israel says that it lives in a tough neighborhood? Surely it bears some responsibility for the lawlessness, including by its illegal assassination program, celebrated in the New York Times.

Then there’s Daniel Gordis, the Israeli author who is noted for his work on the chasm between American and Israeli Jews. Gordis used his weekly column on October 4 to urge American Jews to rally the United States to war against Iran.

Gordin concedes that the relationship between American Jews and Israel is “atrophying.” He also admits that U.S. Jews increasingly don’t accept Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. But Iran is the next Nazi Germany, Gordis says — and in the 1930s American Jews didn’t act.

[D]efending Israel against Iran, defending the Jews against a hate-filled venomous threat—surely, on that, at least, we can all agree and once again work together? . . . Israel’s only sin as far as the Iranians are concerned, the reason it must be destroyed, is that it is a Jewish State.

A century ago… Hitler wrote Mein Kampf, and nonetheless, the following decade, Germans elected him. He had hidden nothing about his plans . . . While Europe burned, Britain closed the borders to Palestine. America, too, closed its own borders, and with the exception of one protest of mostly Orthodox rabbis, American Jews were mostly silent. That historical record is clear.

We’re about to find out if we’ve learned anything since then. In just a handful of years, more than half the world’s Jews will live in Israel . . . And just as it’s about to happen, is the world going to allow Iran—which also hides nothing about its plans—to go nuclear, with the express intent of destroying what will without question be the center of the Jewish world?

This time, will American Jews get America to do the right thing? Will they at least try? Can Israeli leaders mend fences with American Jews to help make that happen? Do sufficient numbers of young American Jews care enough to make this a priority? Does the sense of mutual responsibility that has long been the core of Jewish peoplehood still mean enough to sufficient people?

These hysterical attitudes are not unusual in Israel. The country’s president, Isaac Herzog, has also lately urged American Jews to restore their sense of “Jewish peoplehood” so they can defend Israel.

While Naftali Bennett used his UN General Assembly speech last week to ignore the Palestinian issue and go on at length about Iran for spreading “carnage and destruction” across the region and planning “to blanket the skies of the Middle East with drones.” Iran’s “regime is rotten,” Bennett said, suggesting that it should be brought down.

In his latest cabinet speech, Bennett deplored the “unceasing criticism of the State of Israel” for slaughtering people in Gaza.

I think that there is no Israeli who did not feel frustrated at home over the fact that all those who hate us managed to do so freely.

The global hatred of Israel and plans to destroy the Jewish state are ceaseless themes of Israeli hasbara, or propaganda, used to justify war crimes and human rights violations. You’d think Americans would see through it by now. But sadly there are many purveyors here.

17 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“The global hatred of Israel and plans to destroy the Jewish state are ceaseless themes of Israeli hasbara, or propaganda, used to justify war crimes and human rights violations.”

A small illustration of this lunacy, from Sylvain Cypel’s “The State of Israel vs. The Jews”, page 180, 181:

When Ariel Sharon evacuated the Gaza settlements in 2006, some of the crazier settlers put on striped concentration-camp pajamas…After the 1993 Oslo accord, Israeli nationalists paraded images of Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres in SS uniforms and sporting Hitler-style mustaches, while Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu looked on. Israel must be the only country in the world where calling a political adversary a Nazi is so frighteningly banal….For them [the Israeli public] Nazism just means anti-Semitic madness. Since any adversary of Israel is necessarily anti-Semitic, it can legitimately be called Nazi.

1 of 2

Hasbara Rebuttal No. 2

We would do well to recall that a majority of Americans, about 60% according to a March 2021 survey by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs support the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the Biden Administration’s swift return to negotiations to restore US participation in this plan. Does this fact, that is to say what policies Americans want their government to follow, ever figure into the political calculus of Zionist intelligentsia such as Alper, Gordis or Bennett? I think not.

The next time Bari Weiss or Bret Stephens trot out their favorite Hasbaritic Whataboutery Tactic that attempts to intimidate or smear critics of Israel with the charge of “double standards” (dog whistle for antisemitism smear) for condemning Israel’s violations of international law and crimes against Palestinians when there are other countries with even worse human rights records and policies…let us remind Ms. Weiss and Mr. Stephens (again) that no other country is in a position to influence Congress to go against the will of a majority of US voters. None. Only Israel.

This is the actual, empirical, authentic reason why critics focus on Israel, not because it is a Jewish state. Americans rightly resent the unseemly ability of Zionism to thwart their ability to dictate the actions and policies of their own country. This response has nothing to do with Judaism, but rather with the very reasonable, and very American, preference to keep foreign influence at a respectable distance. As just one example of many possible ones, we can refer to how opponents of John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s presidential candidacy raised alarms over the possibility that, if elected, his Catholicism would make him a vassal of the Vatican, thereby compromising the separation of church and state. Kennedy addressed this very publicly and forthrightly at a speech in West Virginia and lanced that boil almost immediately. The point is that Americans, much like the people in every other democracy, do not want to be seen as puppets of any foreign power, irrespective of its religious identity. Zionists skip over this part because it is not helpful to them in hasbaritic terms.

I suggest this response be provided each and every time any Zionist attempts to use this red herring.

(cont.)

2 of 2

As for Israel’s fear of Iranian nuclear capability I have often wondered if anyone in either the Israeli political nomenklatura or its obsequious American counterpart have ever asked themselves:

“Why would Iran attack Israel with such a powerful and indiscriminate weapon such as a nuclear bomb when to do so would result not only in widespread Israel fatalities but also: innumerable Palestinian fatalities; the destruction of Islam’s third most holy site; the furious alienation of the entire Islamic/Arab world (perhaps even the entire world); saddling itself with eternal pariah status; to say nothing of the horror a US and/or Israeli nuclear counterstrike(s) would visit upon Iran and its people? This list is is by no means exhaustive.

I would love to hear how the CIA, the Pentagon and the State Department contingency projection analysts answer these questions. That assumes, of course, they have been given permission to wargame such scenarios and questions.

Q for Bari Weiss: Is it antisemitic according to IHRA to ask these questions or to fail to ask them?

View 441 posters on:

Hasbara/Israel Advocacy/Zionist Propaganda-Public Diplomacy-Indoctrination-Misinformation-Disinformation

Israel is trying to cook up a war between Iran and Azerbaijan.

Join me in lobbying P Biden

“P Biden, while you may have disagreed with some of scholar and Prof Noam Chomsky’s assertions etc he has played a huge role in so many people’s (including mine) mental evolution’s in political, environmental, foreign policy thinking. He has always pushed, cajoled, educated, promoted deep and intense thinking. He has cultivated an environment of freedom in our thought based on logic and research.
I wish so much that you would acknowledge his huge and beneficial value to the U.S. by honoring him with the PRESIDENTIAL MEDAL OF FREEDOM. Freedom of thought, research, speech, education.
Do it before he dies.
Gore and Nader also need to be acknowledged with Medals
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHFWRl2a_lAn”

Lobby Biden (fb page, email, contact White House) Long shot, however, Chomsky so deserves it.

I so appreciate him and have learned so much because of his body of knowledge and his thinking