‘The Israeli government has ruthlessly and cynically exploited the continuing guilt among gentiles over the slaughter of Jews in the Holocaust as a justification for the murder of Palestinians’

by Philip Weiss on January 16, 2009 · 25 comments

Member of Parliament Gerald Kaufman is the most beautiful Jew in the world. His speech before the House of Commons denouncing the Gaza slaughter will be played for generations to come. His grandmother killed by the Nazis, his tie clip made from a war prize given to an Israeli soldier friend. “Israel was born out of Jewish terrorism,” he says. Hamas is a deeply nasty organization, but it was democratically-elected and must be talked to. Look on Kaufman, ye members of Congress, and weep at your complete absence of courage in the face of atrocities. (Thanks to AC)

Related posts:

  1. Civil war? ‘Jerusalem Post’ attacks lox-and-bagel Jews for opposing Gaza slaughter
  2. Anti-Zionist Jews are issuing a clarion call to leftleaning gentiles– Speak out with us!
  3. Gaza slaughter seems to have made some American Jews just turn off
  4. Take a look at the Israeli government ad that says intermarried Jews are ‘lost’

{ 25 comments }

1 Rowan Berkeley January 17, 2009 at 12:48 am

Member of Parliament Gerald Kaufman is the most beautiful Jew in the world.

Phil, you totally make me puke with this shit. Who exactly do you think you are writing for? Brainwashed children?

2 peters January 17, 2009 at 12:50 am

how does one get involved? i mean beyond boycotting starbucks? how do these things happen?
my take on it is that there needs to be some guerrilla action, getting attention locally wherever you are.
people i know who know… are apathetic. they say, it will take years to change, "they" have control so there is nothing "we" can do.

there must be more people like me who want to do something.
isn't there a need for a good old-fashioned consciousness-raising? a really really big demonstration?
online petitions seem so ignorable. who cares about them?
is there an underground? can i join?

3 Glenn Condell January 17, 2009 at 1:12 am

Rowan, take a powder you goose. Come back when you settle down.

4 D. January 17, 2009 at 1:17 am

Rowan, it's partially a cultural thing. The tone of the media (from which Phil sprung) is considerably more saccharine on this side of the Atlantic. This is the home of "Have a nice day," after all.

5 syvanen January 17, 2009 at 1:18 am

Member of Parliament Gerald Kaufman is the most beautiful Jew in the world.

Good line Phil. I like this. You are hyperbolic but you do bring passion to this discussion.

6 Doppler January 17, 2009 at 1:35 am

Peters, write your congressperson and senators, send them an email chastising them for reciting AIPAC talking points in the face of Israeli war crimes. Send them a link to Kaufman's speech and tell them you expect integrity like this from your representatives. Send them similar emails every time they recite AIPAC talking points, instead of doing their job. Demand that they explain why they would support war crimes and brutality that simply incite hatred and revulsion directed at Israel and the United States.

7 Chris January 17, 2009 at 2:06 am

Peter's,

Start an America First PAC.

8 delia January 17, 2009 at 3:36 am

If Congress and this new administration are already dragging their feet about addressing America's war crimes of the past 8 years, there's not a hope in hell that they'll address Israel's. Get used to the AIPAC talking points.

9 Rowan Berkeley January 17, 2009 at 5:10 am

I would rather be reading Mondo Blankfort. He doesn't generate this miasma of emotional garbage.

10 Fred January 17, 2009 at 5:43 am

Thank you for this post , its very sad to see this but its nesesery to expose it.

11 Rowan Berkeley January 17, 2009 at 6:21 am

AP describes Kaufman as "a frequent critic of Israel who was raised as an Orthodox Jew," with the implication that he is now a lapsed one, although this may be an interpolation by Haaretz:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1055922.html

I want to note here that the ultimate expression of jewish identity is that one make provision during one's life for one's burial in a 'jewish cemetary.' It is quite remarkable how many self-described 'secular jews' do this, too, isn't it?

12 LeaNder January 17, 2009 at 7:18 am

Exactly: They are not simply war criminals, they are fools.

That's exactly what I have been thinking for quite some time now. Wonderful man: Gerald Kaufman. Who are the people trying to interrupt him from the "back benches"?

Yesterday over here a hasbara voice, a Jewish German woman that had emigrated to Israel with 19, managed to humiliate one of the most experienced German journalists on the Middle East. She was joined by both talk show hosts. It was disgusting to watch them. He tried to defend himself, but was constantly interrupted. All were very pleased with themselves, the more the old man was shut out.

13 samuel burke January 17, 2009 at 7:20 am

keep it up phil, wake up american jews who have been brainwashed beyond their ability to be the moral creatures.

this man hits the nail on the head.

zionism is a lie much like marxism leninism is a lie….a criminal ideology that is held up by oppression and torture and murders.

14 Julian January 17, 2009 at 7:41 am

Jews knock Israel and other Jews all the time. What's the big deal? Isn't that what this blog is all about and how Phil makes a living? ("This is my chief source of income…")
Kaufman's speech will be forgotten in a day or two.

15 LeaNder January 17, 2009 at 8:32 am

("This is my chief source of income…")

An insider's first comment? How many do you have by now?

Personal assaults are the weakest. No arguments left, sugar? Never had any?

16 David Habakkuk January 17, 2009 at 9:16 am

LeaNder,

Some remarks Kaufman made back in 2002 give an idea of where he is coming from:

'It is time to remind Sharon that the star of David belongs to all Jews, not to his repulsive Government. His actions are staining the star of David with blood. The Jewish people, whose gifts to civilised discourse include Einstein and Epstein, Mendelssohn and Mahler, Sergei Eisenstein and Billy Wilder, are now symbolised throughout the world by the blustering bully Ariel Sharon, a war criminal implicated in the murder of Palestinians at the Sabra and Shatila camps and now involved in killing Palestinians once again.'

(See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Kaufman.)

17 leaNder January 17, 2009 at 10:15 am

David, I could at many, including some not so well known friends. This just went through my mind:

Obviously I am no fan of either the Israels=Nazi or the Palestinians=Nazis equation. In Germany the anti-Germans are propagators of the second view. I may have even been close to them once, before I leaned. Besides the mainly silent Germans who converted to Judaism, there is a visible league of Arab hunters and ardently pro-Israel right-or-wrong fighters. A phenomenon that that find more and more stunning. Compared to the resistance under the Nazis that seems to be a rather safe preoccupation.

Wordy introduction for this:

But this visualization on Norman Finkelstein's site is stunning.

reminicences of the attraction of the Nazi state of mind

For me the crux of the Philippe Sands & Alan Dershowitz debate. The legal wizard Dershowitz at one point used the Nazis as evidence that torture works: Hadn't the Nazis in France extorted all the wanted to know? Didn't the resistance members confess it all under torture? Hadn't they coughed up all the names even father, mother, brothers, sisters, but yes also friends, comrades?

One day someone should take a close look into these matters. The Nazis as someone to learn from seems have a strong attraction to the authoritarian mind. It is clearly discernible in the OSS files and the studies of e.g. Hitler's character. In a way they reached the peak in the Machiavellian control of the masses. So surely some of its methods must be attractive to a specific mindset?

18 LeaNder January 17, 2009 at 10:16 am

Shit. I could add, of course. Bloody German nitwit. ;) These mistakes are really strange.

19 5 dancing shlomos January 17, 2009 at 11:54 am

i am tired of hearing about jewish gifts to the world. no "gift" jews have given were unique to their minds (maybe freuds sex garbage. but that aint a gift). whatever decent jews did was in a christian or muslim melieu. on their own they go without baths and spit at christian cemeteries.

hamas is not "a deeply nasty organization". it is a palestinian organization for palestinians. does that make hamas "nasty"?.

aipac, jinsa, likud, labor, collective of jewish presidents, us congress, some examples of deeply nasty organizations.

20 chimpsky January 17, 2009 at 11:54 am

leander, the insight into the political environment in germany is fascinating. here in the us we have no clue what it's like but i imagine the israel-as-nazi analogy is a colossal taboo. unfortunately it seems more and more apt all the time. the scale of it all is the most important distinction. thanks for the link to the photos on finkelstein's site! the aryan and zionist ubermenschen sure do look the same, and the palestinian and zhidden untermenschen too!

21 David Habakkuk January 17, 2009 at 1:38 pm

5 dancing shlomos,

As a (non-Jewish) Brit, I have to disagree with you.

A small example: Our greatest post-war comedian, Peter Sellers, was Jewish in the technical sense — his mother was Jewish. And his comedy was, to my mind, thoroughly Jewish.

Perhaps his greatest role was as Wing Commander Mandrake in Stanley Kubrick's Doctor Strangelove.

During the war, Sellers had served in the Royal Air Force, although relegated to ground staff, because of poor eyesight, and never rising above the rank of corporal.

His portrayal of Mandrake — who is both almost comically stiff, but also the centre of sanity in the film, insofar as there is one — is true to a certain type of British military officer.

It is a portrayal done with an outsider's amusement — but also with a certain kind of love.

I could go on at great length about the contribution of Jews to British artistic, intellectual, and political life.

But it is precisely because of my awareness — no, knowledge would be a better word — of the scale of this contribution, that I have come think that the influence of the Zionist lobby in the United States is an utter disaster.

Most British Jews I have known feel some commitment to Israel — if only because of the loyalty which people have to the dead. This is one of the odder of human loyalties, but also one of the most potent.

But — as Kaufman's remarks bring out — what Israel has become faces many of them with enormous problems. One of these is the — to my mind quite rational — fear that the behaviour of Israel will open the door to a revival of anti-Semitism.

Another is that the behaviour both of Israel and its American supporters has come to seem a threat to their notions of what it means to be Jewish.

Many American Jews, as a result of their commitment to Zionism, seem quite happy to form a political alliance with fundamentalist Christians who support Israel because they believe that its establishment is part of God's plan for the End Times.

When these come, the fundamentalists seem to believe, the prescribed number of Jews will convert, and the remainder suffer excrutiating torments.

I doubt whether any of the (many) Jewish friends and acquaintances I have had throughout my life would have felt anything but utter contempt towards the rabble with whom many American Jews seem happy to be associated.

22 D. January 17, 2009 at 2:15 pm

"And his comedy was, to my mind, thoroughly Jewish."

David, assuming Shlomos had any point at all (and I'm dubious), it was to question the meaning of the phrase "Jewish gifts." Nobody, not even Shlomos I hope, is very interested in a genealogical categorization of Sellers. (I'm assuming you don't regard Jewishness as a racial category.) But your comment that his comedy was Jewish is interesting. I agree that there might be such a thing as comedy which expresses Jewishness, but I'll be damned if I know how to describe it. I'd be interested if you have any further ideas.

23 Eva Smagacz January 17, 2009 at 5:49 pm

Way with words, extreme cautiousness, chutzpah, cunning, greed. These seem to be main ingredients of jewish jokes and jokes about jews in Poland.
The huge amount of those jokes shows just how important jewish culture was in Poland before the war.
I am dying to know what main ingredients of polish jokes said between jews in poland were.

24 LeaNder January 17, 2009 at 7:04 pm

here in the us we have no clue what it's like i imagine the israel-as-nazi andoalogy is a colossal taboo.

Look. I don't like it when Norman Finkelstein makes that comparison. He sometimes uses the term in his headlines. On the other hand I understand he uses it to describe an extreme in domination and exploitation. The tools seem to be astonishingly similar over the centuries. Forced labor with series of dead workers accepted, but industrialized extinction, not really. That is the Nazi "innovation".

If a German would use the easy equation, I would suspect she somehow tries to shake of her guilt. …

How about this comparison: [let me borrow a quote from a friend)

There was a Major Walsh, a former Methodist Minister in the United States Cavalry about the same time as General Custer. Walsh was asked by a reporter why he persisted in skewering little babies in the villages his troop attacked. His very short answer could well have come from a Nazi SS officer 80 years later. He said, “Nits make lice.”

25 David Habakkuk January 18, 2009 at 6:44 am

D.,

A very good question. It deserves a better answer than I have space to give it here.

I had partly in mind some remarks by the appalling Kevin MacDonald. In his paper 'Stalin's Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the U.S.S.R', MacDonald writes as follows of German attitudes to Jews in the nineteenth century:

'A major theme of anti-Jewish attitudes was that Jews were deeply involved in creating a “culture of critique” — that Jewish cultural influence was entirely negative and shattered the social bonds of the peoples they lived among. Slezkine cites Heinrich Heine as a prime example of a Jewish intellectual with sincere and tender love for German culture, but the Germans, from Wagner to von Treitschke to Chamberlain and Hitler, didn’t see it that way. For example, Heinrich von Treitschke, a prominent nineteenth-century German intellectual, complained of Heine’s “mocking German humiliation and disgrace following the Napoleonic wars” and Heine’s having “no sense of shame, loyalty, truthfulness, or reverence.”'

(See http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/archives/vol5no3/53-km-slezkine.pdf.)

Note for one thing how by the reference to 'the Germans' MacDonald has implicitly categorized as alien to German culture all kinds of strands in that culture. Among these are central strands in German music, as the many composers who set Heine included Brahms, Schubert and in particular Robert Schumann (who clearly loved the irony.)

More generally, the situation of being partly involved in, and partly detached from a culture, when combined with a mimetic gift, can a produce a facility in rendering characteristic types from that culture. This is characteristically to a greater or lesser extent ironic — but irony is not incompatible with affection.

Classic instances both of irony and of affection come in the wonderful operettas of the Frenchified German Jew Offenbach, who libretti were co-written by Halévy (a Jew) and Meilhac, a gentile.

Another favourite instance of mine is Tony Curtis's mangling of Cary Grant's impersonations of stiff Anglo-Saxon gentlemen in Some Like it Hot — itself a movie based upon Billy Wilder's very Jewish sense of being hounded from pillar to post.

To my mind it is in this tradition that one needs to locate Peter Sellers's great performances — in particular as Wing Commander Mandrake in Strangelove, and the communism-admiring shop steward Fred Kite in I'm All Right Jack. I have never thought his acting was anything like as good when he moved away from the British culture he knew like the back of his hand.

Sometimes, incidentally, Jewish irony could be combined with an almost Old Testament prophetic spirit — as in the denunciations of Austro-Hungarian and German militarism by the great Viennese satirist Karl Kraus. (Kraus incidentally loved Offenbach, and used to perform him in solo shows, with the patter songs updated to satirise current events.)

Unlike Kevin MacDonald, I think that any reasonably healthy culture can benefit from being laughed at. Had the Germans played more Offenbach, and less of that appallingly overrated composer Wagner, we might have been spared two world wars, the Holocaust, and all its after effects, like current troubles in Palestine.

The pompous inanity one finds among many politically influential American Jews is something which I find particularly hard to take, precisely because of this admiration for Jewish irony. I first came across Richard Perle when he appeared on a satellite link on a television programme I produced, more than twenty years ago now.

That horrid pasty-faced apparition which popped up on the screen seemed to me exactly like one of the appalling civilian militarists out of Kraus's great satire The Last Days of Mankind — always enthusiastic for wars which they knew other people and other people's children would have to fight.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Israel finally comes face to face with Gaza

Next post: AWOL on Gaza, liberal American Jewish tradition will never be the same