Goldstone effect: Israelis start to turn on Gaza’s planners

by Philip Weiss on October 29, 2009 · 4 comments

Aluf Benn is writing in Haaretz demanding answers on the public relations disaster/schools bathed with white phosphorus decisions that we call the Gaza war. Note that Benn could have written this in February or January, or December even, but he didn’t. Why not? Because of Goldstone. Because of Israel’s isolation. Note that (as Blankfort, my tipster says), this raises "questions that have been ignored such as who decided to break the ceasefire on Nov.4." Benn’s great lead:

I want to know how and why it was decided to embark on Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip and to expand it into a ground offensive. I want to know if the decisions were affected by the Israeli election campaign then underway and the change in U.S. presidents. I want to know if the leaders who launched the operation correctly judged the political damage it would cause Israel and what they did to minimize it. I want to know if those who gave orders to the Israel Defense Forces assumed that hundreds of Palestinian civilians would be killed, and how they tried to prevent this.

Related posts:

  1. Israel threatened to turn West Bank into ‘2nd Gaza’ if P.A. didn’t sell out on Goldstone
  2. Gaza changed everything (Wieseltier is ’sickened’)
  3. Gaza effect: European boycott is now hurting Israel
  4. Vermont Jew breaks personal taboo and decries Gaza as Warsaw Ghetto (Gaza effect in U.S. is still subterranean but Huge)
  5. IDF admits exaggerating threat of Gaza rockets

{ 4 comments }

1 potsherd October 29, 2009 at 2:52 pm

This is much the same as asking who was behind the invasion of Iraq, whether they assumed that a million Iraqis would die in the process and if they tried to prevent this.

We all know, and we will never know. The perpetrators are always in charge of the investigation.

2 Donald October 29, 2009 at 2:56 pm

“I want to know if those who gave orders to the Israel Defense Forces assumed that hundreds of Palestinian civilians would be killed, and how they tried to prevent this.”

I wouldn’t assume they wanted to prevent this.

3 Nolan October 29, 2009 at 6:00 pm

Mark Regev the Israeli spoeksperson can’t get his lies straight concerning the ceasefire.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfFMZ7Y-s_c

4 Colin Murray October 29, 2009 at 7:22 pm

This is an outstanding piece. Mr. Benn asks excellent questions. Good catch, Phil.

Why did the “cease-fire” agreement between Israel and Hamas collapse, and who decided and why on an IDF operation against the tunnel uncovered near the Gaza border on November 4, which resulted in renewed escalation in the south?

Before embarking on Cast Lead, were diplomatic alternatives explored for achieving calm in the south? Was Hamas’ proposal for renewing calm in exchange for opening crossings seriously considered in Israel, or did the government only want a military operation?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Watch ‘The Daily Show’ tonight!

Next post: ‘Daily Show’ heckler a sign that some are afraid of change. Tell Jon Stewart you’re not.