Jews aren’t smarter (I lift my curse, and yours)

by Philip Weiss on February 10, 2010 · 66 comments


Send to a Friend del.icio.us Digg Furl

A few years ago when she was working for a home magazine, my wife got a feng shui expert into our house to rejigger our energy and when the expert saw me in my office, she said the assignment was about fixing me, my life was out of control. Catherine did my chart and we sat down to go over my problems. She said a big one was that I had no community. She was going to work on that. She wanted me against a northwest wall, facing out. And other stuff too.

She was right about that problem: I’d lost my community. It was about the time that this blog got axed at the New York Observer, so I was no longer working for a Jewish friend I’d worked with since college who I love. And meantime, my Jewish editor at a big publishing house who I also love was not interested in a Jewish book I was writing, saying I didn’t understand Jewish history. And many many other statusy Jewish friends I’d had since college were sailing off over my horizon. For the simple reason that I was beginning to criticize the Israel lobby every day as a threat to the American interest and Jewish life, and my Jewish community didn’t like that.

My wife was upset about it on social/psychological/professional grounds. I’m not that connected to the world anyway, and she felt I had cut all tethers. It disturbed her and not just because she was bringing home the bacon: she wanted me grounded in a community.

And I realize now that I was in grief–which is why I emphasize that I love those friends of mine.

Looking back on it, part of the deal with being inside the Jewish community was a few great modern covenants. They come with the territory, believe me. We are smarter, we have been persecuted, we are exceptional. I believed all these things. I genuinely believed them in my bones. And these covenants/beliefs worked for the Jewish individual on a very practical level. Jews were – and this is objective/factual—predominant in many elite callings, from media to finance to politics, and if you were in the gang, more power to you. I have written about Jewish kinship networks. There can be little question that one of the reasons I got ahead in life was because I’d met so many smart and accomplished Jewish friends in college. They gave me opportunities, for instance in the network of the New Republic, even when my writing was (as Mike Kinsley told me, with the gift of straightforwardness) murky and incoherent. They believed in me and I believed in them, and a big part of it was ethnic discrimination. Stay Jewish, one of my editors once said to me when I was beginning to doubt the rightness of Jewish ethnocentric identity. We all knew each others’ jokes, cadences, ironies– the mental patterns. In Hollywood I understand there is prejudice against non-Jews, and I’ve seen it in New York circles too.

But this discrimination, isn’t it meritocratic? Aren’t Jews smarter? Commentary (stacks of which I grew up surrounded by in an academic household) says it all the time. IQ. Nobel Prizes. And I have said that on this site many a time. Because I still believed it. I believed that Jews are smarter. And this was another part of my grief; I felt that I had gotten off the smart team and on to the dumb team.

Most important, I am hardly the only one who believed it. Everyone in the American power structure came to believe it. And the belief was persuasive. WASPs believed it; they were stunned by the passionate killer bees of the Jewish meritocracy and that is one reason they yielded place. They accepted the idea that Jews are smarter. My wife tells me that she believed it (even as she was studying Freud and going to Jewish therapists and working for only Jews). I bet many Muslims believed it. Many second-rate Jewish writers believed it; and that belief allowed them to elevate their game.

In retrospect I see that as a kind of curse; we were all laboring under a belief that some wise people had cast, and whether false or not is not the question, the belief was governing everyone’s behavior.

This post is prompted by the fact that yesterday morning I ran into my wife’s office to tell her about something I was writing, and when she said, Who told you that? I mentioned the two people who had helped me, and one was an Asian-American Christian, the other an Asian-American Muslim. And I realized that they are dear colleagues of mine in the space that you are in right now, the internet between your ears, and they are both wicked smart, creative (and yes privileged) thinkers, and as Jewish as Paris Hilton.

As I spoke to my wife, it occurred to me that I no longer actually believe that Jews are smarter. I think a ton of people are smart. And god knows I am meeting a lot of them; and having lost my community of mutual enforcing belief, I have found another, by ending that belief inside myself.

OK, so if Jews aren’t smarter, what is this Jewish moment? Why do Jews so predominate in so many professions? It can’t be all discrimination, honey. And no it isn’t. I think it is sociocultural. That given our incredible history of the book, we were specially prepared for what Slezkine called the Jewish Century, when an era of princes and peasants gave way to one of priests and merchants. We carried our knowledge in our head, as Raoul Felder once told my wife, and when bookishness and symbol-analysis became everything to success we were there. Herzl saw the beginning of it over 100 years ago when he said that an “intellectual proletariat” of dissatisfied Jews was forming in the cities of central Europe, over-educated, vital to the new disciplines of law and journalism and science, but hitting a glass ceiling of anti-Semitism. And Kafka saw it a few years later when he read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and lamented, “From early on [Jews] have forced upon Germany things that she might have arrived at slowly and in her own way, but which she was opposed to because they stemmed from strangers. What a terribly barren preoccupation anti-Semitism is, everything that goes with it, and Germany owes that to her Jews.”

Kafka and Herzl died before the true horror of the anti-Semitic reaction. But fast forward and my generation was the climax of the Jewish century, when Jews swarmed the Ivy Leagues, and then the most philosemitic administration in history, Clinton, (per David Frum) was surpassed by the more philosemitic Bush administration and the even more philosemitic Obama administration, where the two men closest to his office, in two boxlike offices, guarding the national security, are Jews, Ax and Rahm.

I say the Jewish century is coming to an end for a bunch of reasons. Because most Jews in leadership have committed themselves to a false idea– that apartheid is alright– and this belief is a wrecking-ball to Jewish culture and intelligence. Bad thinking is all over the rabbinate and the leadership and the journals, and one of the most majestic minds to which I was exposed, my college prof Michael Walzer, is reduced to parochial legalistic defenses of behavior he knows is wrong. And very smart people like Marty Peretz, Leon Wieseltier, David Frum, Alan Dershowitz—they are all the pantaloons of the Jewish state. Trouble ahead, trouble behind, don’t you know that Jews just lost their minds.

It is over because we have power, and power is never conducive to free thinking. It is over because the Jewish century has to end, like all moments in history. It is over most of all because we have shared our great cultural gifts with Americans and others have learned them, because cultural gifts truly are transferable–from our psychological openness to our matriarchy to our worship of education. It is over because others have become Jewish.

I have said this kind of thing before, but I never really believed it. I continued to believe that Jews were born smarter. I continued to believe that I had lost a superior community and gained a lesser one. I no longer actually believe that. And I have many smart friends to show for it.

{ 66 comments }

1 pabelmont February 10, 2010 at 11:46 am

I hope you are right. It is far more comfortable (for me anyway) to be a human being than to be a Jew instead. I hope it becomes more comfortable for a lot of people.

On the issue of US policy for Israel/Palestine, I reluctantly (and with a sad lack of understanding) agree with Noam Chomsky that the US pro-Israel commitment (and its commitment to the dismantling of that part of international law which makes Israel’s behavior in the occupied territories illegal) does not spring from the power of AIPAC/The Lobby but, rather, from some coming together of many threads within the ruling oligarchy in the US “democracy”, and these threads not particularly Jewish. That is why the fact that a majority of US Jews disapproved of the Iraq war didn’t stop it. It had nothing to do with Jews as such. And the AIPAC/The Lobby is small potatoes when measured against the size of the rest of the US oligarchy — the banks, the military industries, the oil industry to name a few. If these OPPOSED US I/P policy, that policy would change. But they don’t and it doesn’t.

2 Colin Murray February 11, 2010 at 12:43 am

“… Noam Chomsky [says] that the US pro-Israel commitment … does not spring from the power of AIPAC/The Lobby…”

I think Noam Chomsky’s argument on “US policy for Israel/Palestine” is utter nonsense. No one is right all the time, including geniuses.

“… but, rather, from some coming together of many threads within the ruling oligarchy in the US “democracy”, and these threads not particularly Jewish. That is why the fact that a majority of US Jews disapproved of the Iraq war didn’t stop it.”

The threads collectively have a name, the Israeli Lobby, and they are predominately Jewish. The fact that Jews were proportionally more opposed to the invasion of Iraq than the rest of the general population is not in any way inconsistent with recognition of the very well-documented existence and activities of The Israeli Lobby.

Laying the majority of the blame for the lies, misinformation, political manipulation, etc that laid the groundwork for convincing vapid and weak ‘Ariel Sharon is a man of Peace’ George Bush and an uninformed and frightened American public of the necessity and justice of invading Iraq, onto a small but very well-funded and well-connected network of Zionist extremists is a completely different proposition than blaming an entire people.

There are about 6 million American Jews. While estimates of the number of people that could legitimately be considered members of the Israeli Lobby, acting either as individuals or through the myriad social, political, and economic organizations of which it is comprised, would vary wildly as a function of the level of their individual political activity, the number of hard-core activists with key roles in government and media who did most of the heavy lifting to lie us into war was likely no more several hundred, not all Jewish.

“It had nothing to do with Jews as such.”

I agree. It had everything to do with extremist Zionists. Every religion and ethnicity spawns radicals. Recognition of the Jewish roots of neoconservatism/neoliberalism is no more anti-Jewish than recognition of the Catholic roots of the Spanish Inquisition would be anti-Catholic.

3 MRW February 11, 2010 at 9:39 am

Yeah, and those Catholic inquisitors were unbelievably mean, cruel sonsofbitches. They raised torture and the delight to use it to a level that theretofore had never been seen as a policy in the service of state religion.

4 homingpigeon February 10, 2010 at 11:49 am

I believe (generally speaking) Jewish folks are smarter than me on just about everything and I am comfortable with that. The exception would be knowing how to live and function in the Middle East. On dealing with the situation in Israel/Palestine and the long term future of the Jewish people there, the majority unfortunately are re—–ed. (Do we or don’t we have Sarah Palin’s permission to use that word?)

5 Mooser February 10, 2010 at 12:08 pm

Damn it! I wrote a brilliant, evocative and gently funny comment on Jewish intelligence, a work of kosher genius. But I hit some stupid button by mistake and it dissappears, and now I can’t post it.
And if that doesn’t prove that Jews are smart!

Anyway Phil, are you trying to say that it never, not even once in all those years occurred to you that the whole “smarter Jew” thing was because maybe, deep down we felt pretty dumb? I mean, when you can’t shoot far enough under par to keep up a replacement birth-rate? And you wanted to be a writer? You should become a Mafia “made man” and we will call you Phil “Face Value” Weiss.

6 Psychopathic god February 10, 2010 at 7:10 pm

I’m pretty sure Mafia — at least the Sicilian branch — is Jewish.

7 Psychopathic god February 10, 2010 at 7:47 pm

re replacement birth rate — somewhere in the last few days an article appeared that discussed the intellectual elitism of Jewish women contrasted with Sarah Palin. The article made the observation that, while Palin openly speaks of her decision to carry to term a Down’s syndrome baby, very few such children are counted among the Jewish population. The article suggested that more Jewish women use medical technology to determine the status of their fetus, and few Jewish women would make the same decision that Palin did.

In Israel, where demographic imbalance is THE existential threat to a “Jewish and democratic state,” some 50,000 Jewish women elect abortion each year, according to friends of efrat.

Efrat claims women resort to abortion because they are impoverished (Israel’s poverty rate is about 21%).
Sources cited in a ynet article (0,7340,L-3642871,00) claim that the relatively high abortion rate is attributable to inappropriate sexual activity:

Despite the Israeli obsession with having “the perfect baby”, studies show a fear of birth defects is not the leading cause for abortion in Israel.

Over 50% of terminated pregnancies are a result of out-of-wedlock conception, incest or conception under illegal circumstances (such as rape, statutory rape), a Health Ministry report published on Tuesday stated.

8 Psychopathic god February 10, 2010 at 7:47 pm

Several years ago, Israel had such a major problem involving sex trafficking that the US called the Israeli government to task and required that Israel take action to stop what amounted to a slave-trade in sex workers imported to Israel from Russia, Romania, Uzbekistan www dot ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3062297,00 dot html. The practice of importing sex workers has abated, but according to a report in Haaretz (hasen/spages/1033043) the problem has only shifted– now, Israeli women are ensnared in Israeli sex trade One university study states that Israeli men pay for 25,000 acts of prostitution each day www dot uri dotedu/artsci/wms/hughes/israel dot htm

9 Psychopathic god February 10, 2010 at 8:46 pm

moral of the story: Jews put their pants on (or take them off, as the case may be) one leg at a time, just like everybody else.

the exceptionalism schtick is soooo Sarah Palin/teabaggy.

10 Colin Murray February 11, 2010 at 12:47 am

Heh :) I feel your pain, having done that several times myself. I now write in notepad or wordpad and control-s a lot, if writing more than a few sentences.

11 Mooser February 10, 2010 at 12:11 pm

“we have shared our great cultural gifts with Americans…”

There you go again! Next you will try to tell us Thoreau and Emerson were Jewish.

12 Mooser February 10, 2010 at 12:19 pm

Look, I’m no therapist,( although my wife swears my touch can cure headaches and muscle aches) but I can’t help thinking that if you played jazzy Hammond organ and drove motorcycles, you would feel a lot better. Sport motorcycles, that is. No Jewish boy would be caught dead on a Hardly-Ableson or “cruiser”. They are dreck
Leave those to the boring again Christians. And when people ask me: Is that a cafe-racer?, I tell ‘em: “No, it’s a Kosher-deli racer!”

13 Scott McConnell February 10, 2010 at 12:23 pm

A terrific piece of writing. The Kafka quote is profound, and it’s true that (as some British aristo philo-semite Joseph Epstein recently quoted said) Jews push the horizons forward. We could all deal with these pushes with some blend of welcome and discomfort but not with being pushed into endless wars for the sake of a racist value system (and it was in great part Jews who educated us against the racist values Israel now embodies).

14 MRW February 10, 2010 at 4:16 pm

I concur with Scott, A terrific piece of writing.

15 Psychopathic god February 10, 2010 at 9:09 pm

y’know, this is Phil’s blog so he can say what he wants.

But I gotta say, I find the entire concept that Jews think of themselves as smarter than the rest of us, and if only the Germans had listened to us, if only those ignorant Germans had done democracy our way, they would have been so much better off, don’t you know, since obviously, obviously Jews know how to do democracy — look at the tremendous successes in Spain, um, well, maybe Amsterdam…. Not since I finished reading Amos Elon have I seen such an arrogant, and self-deluded, expression of Jewish superiority.

Some days ago Brian Greer (?) took me to task for mentioning an article in an 1881 issue of Eclectic magazine. The article discussed how Germans resented the influx of Jews in the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian war: Germans had worked hard, developed their education systems, lived disciplined lives, tended their treasure carefully, and fought and shed German blood to achieve German unification. Jews came in and took advantage of it; presumed to tell Germans how they should run their lives; moved into German educational institutions built with German blood and treasure. Germans didn’t accept the idea that Jews were smarter. For their refusal to concede their nation to the Jewishization process, they were smacked with the tag antisemite and demonized as monsters.

Americans built the US. Americans put their lives, their treasure, their sacred honor on the line to separate from George’s Britain and establish a new nation conceived in liberty, not Jewishness. Jefferson, Washington, Madison were conversant with the Roman and Greek philosophers; Jefferson was a particular student of the Italian Risorgimento and Enlightenment thinking. Hannah Arendt writes that the major sources for inspiration relied upon by America’s founders were the Greek and Roman thinkers, not the Bible comparatively few copies of the Old Testament existed in the colonies and early America (Jefferson’s letters record that he made special arrangements to acquire copies of Bible in French and in Hebrew).

MRW, I don’t concur with Scott or with you. I find this writing self-indulgent, insular, and tone-deaf.

16 Scott McConnell February 10, 2010 at 10:08 pm

PG, The Germans weren’t demonized as monsters until, well you know when. . .
But certainly not in 1881, or 1931 for that matter.

17 MRW February 11, 2010 at 12:56 am

OK. Fine, Psychopathic God.

But what’s tone-deaf? Phil is writing about an evolutionary part of his own thinking, based on how he was brought up, what he was told to think, and the life he had before being forced to be god of this blog. I dont know how long you’ve been on this blog, excuse me if I dont remember, but I’ve been reading Phil since he was at the New York Observer, and developed his own blog there. Then the rat-bastard new pissant owner, now married to Ivana Trump, skewered him for not being Zionist enough and told him to take a hike. So this piece resonates with me. Maybe also because I lived in NYC and my friends were Jews and many of them writers and this was like a reflective confession after Sunday brunch that you take for what it is, something said truthfully at an unusual time.

========================
About your third paragraph about the Germans. Shlomo Sand said something similar at his NYU talk, but he added that the definition of German nationalism to a German meant that no one but someone born in Germany could be a German, unlike an American. Did you ever listen to that talk? It’s in the middle somewhere. And it’s highly entertaining.
http://inventionofthejewishpeople.com/2009/11/shlomo-sand-speaking-at-nyu-october-2009/

18 MRW February 11, 2010 at 12:58 am

Scott, actually that demonization started during the last part of WWI and led to the immigration laws changing in 1924.

19 Psychopathic god February 11, 2010 at 7:04 am

MRW, I respect Phil’s writing and I’ve also admired your comments; I deeply respect, maybe even envy, your historical closeness to Phil and this blog. I’m a newbie here; I am not Jewish, not a New Yorker, not connected or networked; don’t get invited to dinner parties; I’m an outsider in every way.
In my country I’m an outsider. Can you understand how disorienting it is for a plain vanilla American to be told, ‘we elite Jews have transferred our cultural gifts’ to the US, the implication being, ‘American greatness comes from Jews.’ This is a problem for me in two ways:
1. A lot more people and traditions, in addition to the Jews, shaped American culture.
2. Given the current state of the US, Jewish influence on US culture seems to be not all that positive. I mentioned the experience of Germany because my deep fear is that the US is going in the same direction. I’ve mentioned elsewhere the writing of Rabbi Ken Spiro on AISH.org, that Jews have been persecuted before and will be persecuted again; “it’s a pattern.” Patterns of Jews in Germany seem to be playing in the US today. I prefer that the pattern not carry on to the same conclusion, for the sake of Jews as well as of my American children and fellows.
Phil cites Jewish “matriarchy, education, psychological openness” as the greatest contributions.
~American families are in a shambles; more children are children of divorce than of intact families. Women as mother is elevated by Sarah Palin and Mormons; women as political and commercial leader is more idealized in Jewry.
~American education is in a shambles; WASP values and the WASP stamp on education that dominated in the years pre-WWII turned out a pretty well educated young person; my father’s high school education in public schools pre-1940 was more rigorous than my sons’ private college educations in the 1990s. Jews dominate the prestige universities in the US; this is not so much ‘worship of education’ as a kind of territorial imperative. In the 12th century Venice waged war on its neighbors and won; among its most important prizes was the University of Padua. To control a University is as strategically important as to control a fort or military installation (control being the operative word).
In a video history of Jews in Pittsburgh, the narrator explains that in the 1800s, Jews resented that they were not readily admitted to Duquesne University, established by Catholics for Catholics. Jews focused on developing basketball talents in several young Jews, and got them admitted to Duquesne as basketball stars. Was this about education or about influence and control?
In “They Knew they were Right, ” Jacob Heilbrunn writes that the first generation of neocons was a group of New York Jews who were enraged that they had not been admitted to Harvard but had to attend City College. Was education impossible at City College, and possible only at Harvard? Or is the real agenda control of the cultural citadels of the Other?

I’m no longer impressed with Jewish ‘worship of education.’

~Psychological openness- in my view, the impact of Freud and other, related ‘black box’ theories of human psychology, is among the most damaging legacies to have belabored the 20th century. Mass psychology — propaganda based on Freud’s theories, translated into the PR industry by Bernays, is among the most pernicious influences on our age (see this video series http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares) In his series of lectures titled Utopia and Terror, Liulivicius includes media shaping of the message as one of the primary weapons of the murderous regimes that rose in the 20th century.

I’ve wandered in this writing, I’m listening to Shlomo Sand while typing, and I’m distracted by Sand’s Iranian accent. I did hear the statement that “you have to be BORN German to be a German….” contrasted with, one can become an American. The continuation of the point is that one is a Jew if one is born to a Jewish mother. The point? The relationship between nationhood and identity differs and is subject to rules as defined by each group. I was born to Italian parents; I consider that I have at least some element of an Italian identity, but that does not entitle me to citizenship in Italy.

20 MRW February 11, 2010 at 8:52 am

Psychopathic God: I just got past reading this — “Can you understand how disorienting it is for a plain vanilla American to be told, ‘we elite Jews….in two ways — and started smiling because, seriously and sincerely, PG, you gotta live at least a couple of years in NYC to catch on. I can’t explain it. You had to have lived on the Upper Westside and hung out with artistic and literary types to find this perfectly normal. I lived half my life in Manhattan so I’ma Nyoo Yorkah for the rest of my life.

The problem with New Yorkers, every fucking one of them [OK, hyperbole, but still] … every one of them that has become a New Yorker through and through thinks like this, you live there long enough you will too, drawn by artist Saul Steinberg in 1976 and one of the most famous New Yorker covers ever.(For all intents and purposes, New York is Jewish, at least to me):
http://strangemaps.wordpress.com/2007/02/07/72-the-world-as-seen-from-new-yorks-9th-avenue/

Let me tell you, what Phil wrote above was brave — so is this whole goddam blog, he caught the wave at the right moment — seen from inside the world of NYC.

I’ll go back and read the rest of your post now.

21 MRW February 11, 2010 at 9:30 am

Psychopathic god, I understand what you’re saying, and agree with many of your points. I was shocked when I moved out of Manhattan and lived in the so-called heartland to realize how much New York was like a coffin you flew into the back of and then thought that was the only world that mattered. There was culture, glamour, high finance, diversity (ha, ha), fabulous food, great characters, theatre, scintillating conversation, enormous wealth, real ingenuity, all in that coffin box and the rest of the world didn’t have it. Period.

I didn’t realize until I wasn’t going out to the theatre constantly, eating at the best restaurants, attending dinner parties and soirees at the Met, MOMA (etc) with le tout New Yorkand hitting the clubs at midnight that the BBQ&S (Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens & Staten Island) crowd couldn’t dream of setting foot in, that my world was insular, my thinking was insular, and my sense of the world was circumscribed by a set of rules you almost subconsciously agree to make your own in order to survive there. Now, because I have time to read more than ever in my life — I mean, it’s constant, voracious — I listen to NYC pundits and reporters and sneer that they dont read, and few really think.

I have a renewed respect for what the great unnamed in the so-called heartland have accomplished; I understand their disdain for DC (but I draw the line at the extreme Christian Right; I run out of the room). You’re right and Phil is right: this business of the Other that you either feel superior to, or are envious that you’re not counted as part of, has to go. The Abrahamic religions need to clean up their act and join the 21st C. No excuses. No lugging in 2,000 to 5,000 year old rules, or their little books claiming that God talked to the one guy who could scribble on a papyrus. It’s worse than a cosmic game of Simon Says.

22 Danaa February 11, 2010 at 11:18 am

this was very interesting, MRW. The world according to New York as just another box people put themselves in (why did you call it coffin? to add a touch of morbidity?). What strikes me about that is that new Yorkers consider themselves to be so, oh, cosmopolitan……what, me-in-a-box, you say? I go to the Met! I read New Yorker! I meet world thinkers! the impudence!

Here’s what this reminds me of – the little discussion we have all had a couple months back about Bernard Avishai – and his “forward looking”, zionist-liberal, enlightened outlook. Which, when brushed off a bit, turns out to hide – why, just another box-in-a-box – an even more insidious one for being so slippery.

Your post reminded me of the many boxes I have been trying to escape throughout my life – no sooner I see the outline of one, that I become Hudini, wrestling with chains under water. And when freed of one, it always turns out to lead to another. I guess life is a Russian Doll collection.
\
Thanks for making me think in yet another direction….(especially as I’m trying to avoid doing some pressing work…)

23 Citizen February 11, 2010 at 11:36 am

So how many teen movies has there been in the last forty years or so where
the audience gets treated to the in-crowd versus the out-crowd in high school?
Every once in a while somebody grows to old age having actually grown out of high school.

24 Scott McConnell February 11, 2010 at 12:25 pm

I’m going to be a pedant here and disagree. Yes, there was demonization during World War I, but post peace conference there was wide spread feeling that the Germans had gotten a bad deal. And there was little worry about German immigrants once the war was over– more about East Europeans, and southern Europeans. I’d even say there was a significant amount of teutonophilia in american culture in the twenties and thirties, which may have led to some underestimation of the Hitler problem.

25 MRW February 11, 2010 at 12:38 pm

Danaa, ah the avoid-doing-some-pressing-work-moments-of-inspiration. I know it well.

I said coffin instead of roach motel. Remember that ad? They Can Get In But They Can’t Get Out. That’s New York. Once it’s in your system, it’s there for life, especially the way I lived it. And coffins are bigger than roach motels. ;-) You can decorate the inside and have the bright lights and your deli on the corner and the theatres in mid or way downtown and your bialy guy downstairs, and the new restaurants, and 3 AM dancing, if you didn’t decide to Go-Ugly-Early (that’s a guy thing.)

Yeah, and if you live in New York, right in midtown or on the park or select downtown streets, you’re king of the box, and everybody else is some poor schnook who hasn’t figured it out yet, especially anyone west of the Hudson…who are they; they dont count. That’s the thinking, and anyone who says it isn’t is lying. And anyone coming in from Europe is Eurotrash, coming to get some culchah from New Yorkers — can you believe the fucking arrogance, in my tribe it was rife — unless he or she is a real friend or a relative.

I like the ‘life is a Russian Doll collection’ idea.

26 Chu February 11, 2010 at 2:51 pm

P-God:
Do you have a link to this info? influx of Jews in the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian war.Thanks.

27 Psychopathic god February 11, 2010 at 6:06 pm

This information is from an essay in “Eclectic” Magazine, 1881. http://books.google.com/books?id=FYbQAAAAMAAJ&dq=eclectic+magazine+1881+germany&q=jew#v=onepage&q=&f=false

page 344-

I bought the book from an antiquarian bookseller some years ago. It is now part of google’s online project.

28 annie February 12, 2010 at 9:11 am

what Phil wrote above was brave — so is this whole goddam blog, he caught the wave at the right moment

absolutely. this new yorker cover cracks me up.

29 Chu February 10, 2010 at 12:29 pm

I think the Jewish century is waning due to the
hypocrisy of Israel and the Jewish people.
Oppression of Palestinians is a stain that
will mar the Jewish people for eternity.

30 Danaa February 10, 2010 at 12:53 pm

Phil, this was one of your best columns on The jewish Identity question you have produced so far. Lots to chew on. you highlighted well some issues that did not get much space before. Especially, the perception that the wasps – and all educated americans – from whatever continent they come from have and are “becoming Jewish” by osmosis, and in so doing, they are realizing just what the privilege of intellect abetted by networking was all about. And they all clamor to emulate just that – each community in its own way.

To elaborate on your point: They – the non- jewish intellectual carpetbeggars (which is what even wasps have been reduced to) – are knocking against the new glass ceiling, one that t has been originally erected to accelerate – and protect – jewish progress, but has now come to impede the progress of others. Like asian americans. Like hispanics. Like wasps. The first two far more aggressive than the latter and largely free of guilt – having come from people that each had their own unique holocausts to contend with.

That new glass ceiling, one that is evident in places like the east coast intelligensia, the media, the msm, law, academia, finance and economics, is becoming visible and is being resented far more than the jewish elite is willing to acknowledge. But just about everyone reading this blog knows about it and openly talking about. The israeli-firsters are dead set on fencing in any populist, new immigrant and old privilege resentment as “new anti-semitism”. Everyone else is pushing back exactly against such designation.

People like you Phil, Adam, MJ Rosenberg, Tony Judt, J streeters, bruce wolmam, jeffrey and many others from within the jewish community see the enormous danger in that percolating resentment. especially when the well-to-do-network of the newly powerful are so keen to suppress discourse on matters of power and privilege harnessed to support an inhumane enterprise like occupation and ethnic cleansing. perhaps you have all been given the second sight needed to perceive the percolating bubbles just underneath the surface. And are desperately trying to provide some safety valve to release at least some of that boiling steam. Alas, there’s another power working against you and indeed, against the interests of the jewish people in the west. And that’s the other beast, israel, where jewish privilege, unproscribed by any gentile walls, has truly run amok with power.

It is perceptive of you to point out that the end of the jewish century is near. But ends of anything can be traumatic and unleash new cycles of unpleasantness and even violence. One would assume that’s what’s keeping you awake at night, pondering the ends and the means.

Here’s cheering you on.

31 MRW February 10, 2010 at 4:18 pm

Another superb post, Danaa.

32 americangoy February 12, 2010 at 12:43 am

So many great comments, such a great post, I feel humbled.

I apologize in advance for my tidbit.

“That new glass ceiling, one that is evident in places like the east coast intelligensia, the media, the msm, law, academia, finance and economics, is becoming visible and is being resented far more than the jewish elite is willing to acknowledge”.

This.

This is what irks me, on top of my tax money going to abet an oppressive, apartheid regime. I am a 2nd class citizen in my own (adopted) country.

Another thing, completely off topic – Phil, dig up vid (vids?) of Jon Stewart debating William Kristol.

I could spot a palpable behind the scenes combat going on, something that flew right over the head of 99% of the viewership of the show. They could sense it, but they did not know what it was.

What it was was twofold – it was a fight for the soul of America. Jews, in the ascendant, were fighting over the soul of America and the direction of it.

Kristol was grinning ear to ear and laughing, saying with his eyes and his double entendres “Why are you doing what you are doing? Look at these schleps, these goyim, they are not worth it – just use them, wring them out for yours and mine benefit and be done with them”.

While Jon represented that other side of Jews – “We might be perhaps smarter and perhaps more fortunate than most in America now, our peer support network is tremendous, but we should use that to not just enrich ourselves and our tribe, but help all others here – and in the world around us – also”.

That is what I saw.

Waxing a bit poetic here.

Two tremendous forces in America in combat – wonder which side will win?

Apologies for my post, now back to the intelligent comments on the site.

33 AM February 10, 2010 at 1:36 pm

You are a great you Phil. If I ever find myself on the other side of the country, I will definitely try to get ahold of you for a few drinks, providing you are willing to hang out with a someone half your age ;)

I grew up in a very diverse environment (the perks of having a dad in graduate school ) and never really noticed race until it was brought up to my attention. I way always upset with the idea of ‘Jewish Superiority’ because I never felt it was true. If anything, I felt it was a case of “If you believe you will succeed, you will” on steroids because now one is invoking divine providence in establishing one’s superiority. I honestly feel those ideas are dangerous, because it is not much of a segway from these ideas to more sinister, racist ideas.

34 Citizen February 10, 2010 at 3:11 pm

So what are you saying, AM, that you are happy Phil has decided he’s not really a member of an innately superior tribe of humans? Are you saying that Nazi POV is the same as Zionist POV–the only difference is who’s cast in the role of rats?

35 slowereastside February 10, 2010 at 1:53 pm

“It is over most of all because we have shared our great cultural gifts with Americans and others have learned them, because cultural gifts truly are transferable–from our psychological openness to our matriarchy to our worship of education. It is over because others have become Jewish.”

Love that interpretation but, unfortunately, it’s not true. Obviously, America had a vibrant intellectual/cultural history prior to the rush of Jewish immigrants (wonder what William James thought about psychological openness). Of course, Jews augmented these areas, but then that was also an American tradition –to steal the best from everywhere.

The real, purely Jewish contribution to American life, its greatest gift, was the Jewish sense of equality/rational justice –something that is probably antithetical to all power. But after American Jews used their gift to ascend the Establishment, they kicked it away and effectively become hypocrites, giving this site a nearly endless supply of critical ammunition.

36 Citizen February 10, 2010 at 3:15 pm

Slowereastside, I see you are not slow at all. What a great comment you made.

37 otto February 10, 2010 at 3:59 pm

“For the simple reason that I was beginning to criticize the Israel lobby every day as a threat to the American interest and Jewish life, and my Jewish community didn’t like that.”

As good as example as any that boycott/etc is already part of the politics of Israel/Palestine, but it’s on the pro-Apartheid side.

38 Gene February 10, 2010 at 4:04 pm

If they are so smart, how come we have this terrible conflict in Palestine? And I don’t think that we are all becoming Jewish either, whatever that means. Rather I believe that those who had put themselves above Humanity are being brought back into the fold. There is nowhere else to go anyway, is there?

Where I come from, the Chinese were thought to be the smart ones. Faced with discrimination albeit subtle, they banded together, had their own educational institution where the kids went after regular schooling mind you, to study the Chinese language and other cultural mores of the ‘motherland’. Their community was very tightly knit. Yet, I have never felt that they put themselves above everybody else. Quite the contrary.

Speaking of smart, I came upon this page recently. Historian Fasolt is right when he said that History is political. There is a reason that such knowledge about other ’smart peoples’ had been kept from us for so long.

39 MRW February 10, 2010 at 4:27 pm

Here’s another one recorded by, then published, on the BBC website last week.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/02/100204_chinas_forgotten_admiral.shtml

Here’s what the Muslim maritime technology introduced into China (via Genghis Khan). Zheng He’s ship compared to Columbus’ and created 70 years before. Zheng he’s first voyage was 62 of these treasure ships (400 ft), then 255 of smaller ones (300 ft) for supplies and troops.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Zheng_He%27s_ship_compared_to_Columbus%27s.jpg

40 Mooser February 10, 2010 at 4:30 pm

Gene, behind your back, those Chinese kids call you a “barbarian” and laugh cause you eat with a fork. Hell of it is, they’re right.

But you know, I’ve heard that “Jews are smarter” bit all my life, and also that “Jews love equality” nonsense. There is no foundation, for either one.

It’s gonna be ugly when Phil realises he can’t live without his “bones”, he’ll scurry right back, like a former Communist condemning the movement. But first, of course, he’s going to try and “fix” the Jews.
He’s never done anything that wasn’t part of it, or in reaction to it. He’ll get a look at what life is like for an individual of his capabilities and it’ll scare him to death. It’ll be fun while it lasts, tho.

41 marc b. February 10, 2010 at 5:00 pm

It’s gonna be ugly when Phil realises he can’t live without his “bones”, he’ll scurry right back, like a former Communist condemning the movement.

That has always been my sense as well, Mooser, although I have never felt that the completed circle of his journey would be found out to have been consciously contrived. Phil’s continued celebration of Jewishness, through the promotion of Jewish superiority in the guise of being critical, is also a bit icky. But I must admit that the pain of loss, which is what he really is describing, the extended mourning over the death of his former family, feels entirely sincere in this piece. And for the first time, I feel for the guy. Really, I do.

42 Gene February 10, 2010 at 8:59 pm

[...] behind your back, those Chinese kids call you a “barbarian” and laugh cause you eat with a fork.

I’m ok with that. Humans (most of them at any rate) have those little stories that they tell themselves about their great origins and their superior mores & how the Other is soooo to be pitied. I get it. That’s partly what being human is all about.

One of the very few advantages of having grown up in a place that has been colonized by the French first, and then by the British, is that you eventually get to see the strings. In our French classes, we were told that France & the French were the greatest. In our English classes, it was “Rule Britannia – Britannia rule the waves” rah! rah! rah! Something was amiss there.

Eventually (that word again – indeed it was a long process) we found out that everybody plays those little games, from the Indigenous Peoples in far away places and nearer home to our own, I guess what can be called, nationalists and supremacists. Still, all those stories are earth-bound. If there are deities somewhere, we all know they are impotent and mostly serve as metaphors for our own strengths and weaknesses. Fundamentalist Zionists, on the other hand, have meshed the ‘Here and Now’ with the ‘Beyond’ (whether ontologically or politically is irrelevant) BECAUSE together with collaborators & compradors, they have had the means and power to impose their version of the Time-Space continuum on the rest of Humanity with no benefit whatsoever to the latter.

Phil’s dilemma, I think, comes from his insistence on tribalizing Jews in their totality whereas it is fairly obvious that the notion of tribe is very fluid and contextual. Thus, instead of recognizing that only some Jews have morphed into colonizers and predators (and not just in Palestine), he insists on grouping all of them together. Yes, they are very powerful, but they’re still only a part of the whole. Their legitimacy is still up in the air. Perhaps the first question that he needs to answer is why is he doing that.

MRW, great links! What a ship! Thanks!

43 MRW February 11, 2010 at 12:30 am

So were your links, Gene.

44 Mooser February 10, 2010 at 4:37 pm

What brought me back is that “lift your curse”! Screw that, Phil, I ain’t got no curse on me (well, besides whatever my wife does with that rag doll and those hat-pins)!

If there is one thing I know in my bones (or when I was younger, in my boner) it’s exactly how stupid I am. I grew up in a completely Jewish milieu (that’s a Yiddish word for “subdivision” or “development” but no matter how hard they tried, I clung tenaciously to the central idea of my own stupidity. And I’m glad I did!

Other than that of course, “You Must Believe in Spring”

45 Mooser February 10, 2010 at 4:42 pm

“It is over because others have become Jewish.”

Gee, Phil, don’t be tooo awful obvious about how you simply can’t let go of Jewish superioirity.
Besides, it’s not true: 9 out of ten times when a non-Jew uses a Yiddish expression he gets it wrong. Look at my FIL; he always called them “National Hebrew” instead of Hebrew National.

46 Mooser February 10, 2010 at 4:51 pm

“when the expert saw me in my office, she said the assignment was about fixing me, my life was out of control.”

Man, you could screw up a wet dream! You couldn’t tell what your wife really wanted was for you to throw that phony out as soon as she said that? (“Out of control? Out of control? I’ll show you out of control!”) And accidentally bump her on the way out, so she drops her bag and all your silver teaspoons, which she helped herself to, rattle out on to the floor? Then you shut the door in her face, and say the thing your wife really wanted to hear: “Feng shui? Feh!”
Your wife was depending on your superior Jewish intelligence and rational skepticism to rid her of a phony and insufferable bore, and you let her down!

47 Richard Witty February 10, 2010 at 7:23 pm

I think you described that you are STILL in a cul-de-sac.

Harvard Jewish are two co-characteristics of what you think of as Jewish. It aint’ necessarily so.

The Jews that you criticize on the basis of power are your adversaries since college (or before), and the Jews that you ridicule are still the ones that didn’t and couldn’t get into Harvard, you know, the ignorant tribal ones.

Rashid Khalidi is almost more Harvard Jewish to you than the dumb IDF supporter, the kosher butcher, the former working class nouveau riche.

Tribes, communities, are important. The individual relative to the ALL is isolating. It results either in politicalist mush, commercialist mush, or mystical mush. Better to be part of something smaller, something mutually supportive.

A wish for me, a wish for you.

48 slowereastside February 10, 2010 at 8:47 pm

“Better to be part of something smaller, something mutually supportive.”

Isn’t that what they tell kids who don’t get into Harvard?

49 jimby February 11, 2010 at 9:13 am

“The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. To be your own man is hard business. If you try it,you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.”
Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936)

50 marc b. February 10, 2010 at 7:24 pm

Fer f*cks sake. White European racial unity? The history of Europe in the 1000 years or so before the meat grinders of the world wars were put in motion was pretty bloody conflicted. That’s why millions, including my ancestors, left. And the white European immigrants who came to America were welcomed with open arms by their racial bretheren, right? Well, no. My mother and her family were called dumb pollacks, and she and her siblings fought with their Irish and Italian brothers until they could leave all that love behind. jesus but you’re f*cking dum.

As for ‘The American Third Position’, presumably you’re borrowing that name from the neo-fascists in Italy, Il Terze Pozizione? Brilliant.

I swear that all the recently arrived nuts here are trying to provoke censorship of this site, undermining its effectiveness. But then I am congenitally paranoid.

51 Donald February 10, 2010 at 7:32 pm

There’s sometimes a whiff of holocaust denial and old-fashioned white racist anti-semitism (note that book he mentions at the end) that filters into the comment section here. I think the rest of us should be ripping into these people. It doesn’t do Phil’s blog or the cause of human rights any good to tolerate these morons.

52 marc b. February 11, 2010 at 7:42 am

Santomauro has been dissappeared? Good riddance.

53 Cliff February 10, 2010 at 8:00 pm

Seems like an argument we’d here from a Zionist about wanting to preserve Israel’s ‘Jewish majority’. There is no moral center. It’s purely ethnocentric and yes, racist.

These arguments ignore historical injustices. Why the hell would you think anti-Zionists would support Zionists by another name, ‘White nationalists’?

Get lost Santomauro.

54 dalybean February 10, 2010 at 8:33 pm

If you click on this guy’s name, it goes to a site touting a holocaust denial book and his referral to Kevin McDonald is also to a holocaust denier. He should be banned immediately.

55 Cliff February 10, 2010 at 8:52 pm

Kevin MacDonald is not a Holocaust denier. I’ve watched his videos on YouTube. He’s more of a Zionist for ‘Euro-Americans’ or something.

Just like the guy said. He tries to ‘promote’ ‘White’ interests. He defines them as preserving a White majority, without being hateful. That you can want to preserve your demographic advantage without hating ‘the other.

Kind of like Witty and his opposition to One-State because Jews lose their advantage in Israel as ‘privileged’ citizens. Actually, I’d say Zionism is more racist/racialist than people like Kevin MacDonald. Considering the short amount of time it’s been from the Nakba and how Israel is a colonial-settler State STILL continuously since the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

56 dalybean February 11, 2010 at 9:23 am

OK. I don’t want to tar Kevin MacDonald unfairly. I was wrong to jump to the conclusion based on him testifying in the Irving trial and not doing more research.

57 Citizen February 11, 2010 at 1:04 pm

Here’s MacDonald’s explanation of why he testified at the Irving Trial:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Irving.htm

58 DICKERSON3870 February 10, 2010 at 9:09 pm

RE: “I’m not that connected to the world anyway, and she felt I had cut all tethers.” – Weiss
MY VISUAL:
HAL takes out Frank – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbCsAlweJXk
P.S. …I’m afraid. I’m afraid, Dave. Dave, my mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I can feel it. I’m a… fraid. Good afternoon, gentlemen. I am a HAL 9000 computer. I became operational at the H.A.L. plant in Urbana, Illinois on the 12th of January 1992. My instructor was Mr. Langley, and he taught me to sing a song. If you’d like to hear it I can sing it for you.
It’s called “Daisy.”
[sings while slowing down]
Daisy, Daisy, give me your answer do. I’m half crazy all for the love of you. It won’t be a stylish marriage, I can’t afford a carriage. But you’ll look sweet upon the seat of a bicycle built for two.

59 DICKERSON3870 February 10, 2010 at 10:14 pm

2001: Why Kubrick used “Daisy” for HAL’s death (01:39) -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGsfwhb4-bQ&feature=related

60 annie February 10, 2010 at 11:15 pm

oh my. i haven’t had time to read the comments so i’m just winging it here phil. blame it on my bay area upbringing but this is the first time i ever heard anyone say they thought jews were smarter than the rest of us!

you crack me up. lots of people are smarter than me and lots aren’t. ’smarts’ is also balance and finding happiness. i always assumed jews got ahead because they support each other, sort of a reverse discrimination. i don’t give it a lot of thought. no, i don’t think jews have some special dna that makes them smarter. maybe they have some extra umph that reinforces or perpetuates an idea of what ’success’ is and culturally are hardwired to strive in ways others aren’t. one of my goals in life has always been to have the ability to be invisible or hang under the radar. i value my free time and have always been self employed..ie, no boss, lots of time to smell the roses. there’s something to be said for having no debt and little fear. i heard once the smartest animals are the hardest to domesticate. we all have out own concept of smarts and it never occurred to me jews were better off in categories i deem the most valuable of assets.

tomorrow i will read the comments.

i’m a big fan of charisma and you’ve certainly got that ;)

61 annie February 10, 2010 at 11:27 pm

this guy is a freak, ban him fast. let him peddle his bullshit somewhere else.

A race or an ethnie without a sense of peoplehood or ethnichood will end up being used to achieve the goals of other ethnies.

fuck off. racists define ‘peoplehood’ by race. ‘my people’ are those globally who advocate for equal rights. my peoplehood is defined by people who share similarities with me that transcend race. you are so last century.

62 VR February 11, 2010 at 2:26 am

“I say the Jewish century is coming to an end for a bunch of reasons. Because most Jews in leadership have committed themselves to a false idea– that apartheid is alright– and this belief is a wrecking-ball to Jewish culture and intelligence.”

I suggest that you look carefully about what I posted recently Phil, because Apartheid is merely a tool that is used to enfranchise a people beyond supposed remedy. That is, Israel may indeed relent, but t relent like South Africa, that has an merely five million elite that now rule all the economic concerns (however related) in South Africa.

Making their regime so repugnant and controlling of everything financially worth while, that when the repugnance is eased the majority are willing to let them walk away with the baby in the bathwater (so to speak). This is going to be the attempted end game of Israel (do not kid yourself, they are exactly alike, Israel and South Africa, Europe and the US supported SA just like the do Israel), to rule the roost as a minority in the midst of a majority – and this because the bold visible apartheid will never last.

They (Israel) will try to seemingly enfranchise a Palestinian Mandella, who in negotiation with them will give away the whole farm, because of the threat of everything economically viable (corporations, etc.) will bolt and exit. So, gross visible apartheid which is purposefully displayed will give way to economic apartheid and the disenfranchised never reaching any form of parity. You can see their plan unfolding with enfranchising (to a small degree) certain areas in the West Bank and inside Israel, while the rest (Gaza and the diaspora, refugees abroad) never gain anything. Those partially “enfranchised” are meant to be the fat around the Israeli elite.

Studying South Africa apartheid, both its early and later form, is like reading a map with instructions to where Israel is going – there are twists and turns in the Israeli version that make it unique, but not in the main. The challenge will be, not to allow it to happen like it is currently in South Africa (hell, even the “international loans” are prepared to sell the Palestinians into bondage).

APARTHEID DID NOT DIE

63 Oscar February 11, 2010 at 3:23 am

Amazing post, Phil. One of the most compelling essays you’ve written to date.

64 The Hasbara Buster February 11, 2010 at 9:10 pm

As a person of average intelligence, I’m sometimes thankful not to have been born Jewish. If I had, I’d be able to gloat over the Nobel prizes, the high-tech success of Israel, even Mark Spitz’s medals. As it worked out, I had to turn to doing other things, reading, writing, playing the piano, to feel I was doing something worthwile, because I didn’t belong to a religion/people that by itself gave meaning to my life.

My point is, belonging to a group perceived as smart may sometimes (especially if you’re not particularly talented) discourage the pursuit of accomplishments of your own. My experience is that the blindest supporters of Israel (and I mean those who peddle the hasbara and believe it) are Jewish people who don’t have much to show in the way of personal achievement.

65 cvillej February 12, 2010 at 8:44 am

“Trouble ahead, trouble behind, don’t you know that Jews just lost their minds.”

Great piece, Phil. 100 points for referencing the Dead.

66 pabelmont February 12, 2010 at 10:00 am

Phil, There seems to be agreement (at least in anti-Zionist circles) that AIPAC/The Lobby controls US policy and that US politicians are afraid to criticize Israel. Today, that’s a “given”, even if change is on the horizon, if but dimly.

What you have added to the discussion is that there is in the US a society-of-successful-Jews in academia, politics, MSM, finance, etc., who support each other (and preferentially support Jews seeking admission to these professions, thereby creating a “glass ceiling” which tends to exclude non-Jews) (hereafter, the “Glass-Ceiling-Jews”). Excellent point.

I’d add a supposition, and ask for discussion, that a person’s continued membership within Glass-Ceiling-Jews requires that she not express anti-Zionist ideas publicly. This would mean that there exists within the US power structure, if not within the oligarchy itself, then within the swirl of powerful attendants and servants of the oligarchy, a large and powerful clique, Glass-Ceiling-Jews, whose members are not permitted publicly to join all the non-powerful, quotidian US Jews who oppose Iraq war and who may also oppose settlements, for example.

Thus, presumably, an Irisher VP of a big bank might be allowed to express any and every sort of opinion vis-a-vis Irish questions, but a Jewish VP of a big bank must “toe the hasbara line” or risk being ejected into outer darkness. Most seriously, it means that Glass-Ceiling-Jews in MSM are in effect required to avoid expressing news (fact) or opinion or interpretation which might be taken as anti-Zionist. this could explain how very bad NPR has been.

Do you buy this? can you say it better?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: