6, count em 6, members of Congress sign letter to Clinton expressing concern for ‘safety’ of US citizens on flotilla

This just in from Just Foreign Policy:

A congressional letter re the U.S. Boat to Gaza was sent to Secretary Clinton today and posted here: Six members of Congress signed on to Rep. Dennis Kucinich's letter calling on Secretary Clinton to "work with the Israeli government to ensure the safety of the U.S. citizens on board" the U.S. Boat to Gaza, the Audacity of Hope. The letter was sent to Secretary Clinton on Friday, June 24th.

Check out the letter. No endorsement of the flotilla, no word on the siege of Gaza. "We wholeheartedly support Israel's right, and indeed its duty, to protect its citizens from security threats." And:

"In order to avoid another confrontation this year, we urge all parties to practice maximum restraint and avoid violence." 

Hear that, flotilla passengers? 

Not a word about safe passage. Not a word about safe passage. Because you can't call for a flotilla to be let in to Gaza. All you can say is, don't kill them. Triumph.

More from Just Foreign Policy:

In addition to Rep. Kucinich, signers included: Rep. William Lacy Clay, Sam Farr, Bob Filner, Eleanor Holmes Norton, and Barbara Lee. Just Foreign Policy applauds these members of Congress for speaking out for the safety of the U.S. passengers on the Audacity of Hope. Policy Director of Just Foreign Policy Robert Naiman will be a passenger on the U.S. Boat to Gaza. In a press statement released today, Naiman noted, "State Department officials have an obligation to speak out against threats to attack us. It is deeply disappointing that they have so far failed to do so.”

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.
Posted in Israel/Palestine

{ 75 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. mudder says:

    Please flotilla passengers–don’t attack the IDF, for it cannot defend itself. And your congressman is waiting to vilify you.

  2. annie says:

    State Department officials have an obligation to speak out against threats to attack us.

    perhaps they think their higher duty is their obligation to israel’s foreign ministry.

  3. lobewyper says:

    That only six congresspeople signed the letter is absolutely outrageous!!!

  4. bijou says:

    This is seriously, seriously, seriously disturbing. Our government no longer serves us even in the most basic ways. It’s freaking unbelievable. When given a choice between the lives of 50 upstanding American citizens and Israel’s illegal blockade, apparently it is a no-brainer for our government which matters more. They don’t even care about pretending the American lives matter. There isn’t even a false front to make the slightest show of it.

    Donald Trump, where are you when we need you to say You’re FIRED!!

  5. American says:

    They need to take their flotilla to Washington.
    Crash it thru the doors of congress and let Americans see congress having US citizens attacked.
    You cannot ‘appeal’ to congress or our government…said that a thousand times damn it…they are not reformable….you are going to have hold their heads underwater until the bubbles stop coming up.

    I am getting nostalgic for the days of the wild west when the good guys could take a 45 and a posse and go get the bad guys.

  6. radii says:

    O witless Witty … which law are they breaking?

    They are private citizens on a private vessel taking cards and letters (and maybe some cement to rebuild homes destroyed by israel in the massacre of Cast Lead).

    They have stated clearly and repeatedly they are nonviolent and intend no violence and have no weapons.

    International law supports their rights to be international waters.

    The only “law” they are breaking is that of the rabid zionist monsters they they get to molest, maul, mutilate and murder anyone they decide to make suffer and die.

    It is reprehensible and deeply shameful that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have put the U.S. gov’t on the side of the monsters in direct contravention of their duty to protect American interests.

  7. Linda J says:

    Robert Naiman from Just Foreign Policy is on the U.S. flotilla boat. The letter from the Congress people may be a token, but Just Foreign Policy is walking the walk.

  8. yourstruly says:

    not breaking the law

    breaking the siege

  9. yourstruly says:

    the u.s. government is giving israel the go ahead to attack americans?

    and government of, for and by the people?

    wouldn’t that be nice?

  10. The usual lies and posturing, signed off by their Likud controllers. Both sides need to show restraint? As if both sides were equally violent – a ship full of letters and volunteers has terrified the whole of Israel with its lethal cargo of paper and unarmed do-gooders. Good god, the IDF have done special training courses to deal with this diabolical threat to their existence.
    Had any of these people a functioning brain, they would simply have asked what’s the big deal about supplying aid and comfort. Did they issue apocalyptic threats if aid got through to Haiti?
    What they should be doing, if they actually want to stop violence, instead of giving Israel the green light to injure people and steal their possessions, is to demand that Israel lets them through. Then there will be no trouble. Even better, an armed US escort should make sure this happens.

  11. seafoid says:

    link to haaretz.com

    “In my travels to Europe I speak to predominantly Jewish audiences, but also to non-Jews who care deeply about Israel. They voice their pain and anguish openly: They want to understand what has happened to Israel. They desperately want to stand by it, but they are, increasingly, at a loss of knowing how to do so.
    Their questions are simple. They know that Israel is located in one of the world’s most difficult neighborhoods; they have no illusions about the Iranian regime or Hezbollah; and they know the Hamas charter. But they don’t understand how any of this is connected with Israel’s settlement policies, the dispossession of Palestinian property in Jerusalem, and the utterly racist talk about the ‘Judaization’ of Jerusalem. They feel that they no longer have arguments, even words, to defend Israel.
    Israel has never had a government that so blatantly violates the core values of liberal democracy. Never has a Knesset passed laws that are as manifestly racist as the current one. Israel has had foreign ministers who were unworldly and didn’t know English; but it has never had a foreign minister whose only goal is to pander to his right-wing constituency by flaunting his disdain for international law and the idea of human rights with such relish.”

  12. seafoid says:

    A very interesting comment on the Ha’aretz site

    link to haaretz.com

    “Let us look at the composition of Israeli Jews today: 1. The former Soviets constitute about 20%. They grew up under a totalitarian regime and tend to prefer strong leaders and a brute-force approach. 2. The Sephardim/Mizrahim (from Islamic states), constitute about 1/3 of the Jews. They tend to hate Arabs, their former oppressors, tend to be more emotional people, and their grounding in democracy is still weak. Shasniks are of course worse in this respect. 3. Religious Ashkenazis, including Haredim, about 10% of the Jews (as estimated by Knesset representation, which minimizes their numbers because they have many children). Haredim and the religious are messianists and believe in Religious Law as superior to state law.// Altogether we have about 2/3 of the Jews with
    hardline tendencies, based on cultural and religious background. ”

    in 1970 these people had 18 seats in the Knesset (out of 120). now they have a majority.

    This man’s grandchildren are helping to destroy Herzl’s Jewish state.

    link to artsconnected.org

    Americans have knee jerk support for Israel and have had since 1970 but they don’t understand how Israel has changed in the meantime.

    • Woody Tanaka says:

      That is a very good point. One interesting thing to me is that the right wing in the US is still very rabidly anti-Russian, supposedly for its anti-liberal policies, but those same policies are a part of Israeli policies — often because of Russian Jews — but the US rightwing is silent.

    • tree says:

      Americans have knee jerk support for Israel and have had since 1970 but they don’t understand how Israel has changed in the meantime.

      Israel hasn’t changed that much. The ethnic cleansing was not done by Arab Jews or even by Soviet Jews. The theft of land was primarily done by secular Ashkenazi Jews. Even during the 1967 war and the push for settlements that followed, Ashkenazi Jews in Israel were firmly in power. The racism in the system is just more apparent now because of the internet, and perhaps a bit more out in the open instead of couched behind so many euphemisms.

  13. dbroncos says:

    With a tepid voice of concern, a mere six reps speak out for the safety of American citizens who are committed to justice in Israel/Palestine. Another example of how the Lobby ties the hands of our representatives by railroading “material aid to terrorists” (Israel’s enemies) legislation through our congress. Pity-full.

  14. dbroncos says:

    When the tide in the U.S. is decisively turned against the racism inherent to Zionism, and it becomes a liability for people of conscience to be associated with that racism, we’ll see a stampede for the microphones on the part of all the agnostics in congress who will then demand credit for being believers.

  15. kalithea says:

    Not surprising that Congress is held hostage by the racist, terrorist Zionist state and that Congress that fawned all over the present-day king of Zionism in slavish adulation is complicit in doing the bidding of its evil master.

    There is no democracy anywhere on Zionist-occupied territory and Congress is occupied, so don’t expect the rights of Americans to be protected, expect the “Audacity of Hope” vessel to expose the “hypocrisy of Obama” as attempts are no doubt underway to try to sabotage it’s mission which is to bring HOPE to the people of Gaza. But Obama would rather bend over for his masters in the criminal supremacist state of Israel.

  16. Citizen says:

    We are all still waiting for Dick w to support his (usual type of blanket, generic) assertation that the Americans in the flotilla are “breaking the law.” What law, Dick? Did the crew on the Audacity Of Hope forget to pay a docking or ship trip permit? Tell us. Are those 6 Congressmembers breaking “the law” too? Again, what law? The US has not prevented them from sailing in the flotilla, merely issued the following travel warning, one most peculiarly worded–a first when talking about travel in the vicinity of a state officially friendly to the US (although the US does not have a mutual-defense treaty with Israel the two states’ military & security are highly enmeshed):

    “U.S. citizens are advised against traveling to Gaza by any means, including via sea. Previous attempts to enter Gaza by sea have been stopped by Israeli naval vessels and resulted in the injury, death, arrest, and deportation of U.S. citizens. U.S. citizens participating in any effort to reach Gaza by sea should understand that they may face arrest, prosecution, and deportation by the Government of Israel. The Government of Israel has announced its intention to seek ten-year travel bans to Israel for anyone participating in an attempt to enter Gaza by sea. On May 31, 2010, nine people were killed, including one U.S. citizen, in such an attempt. The U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv and the U.S. Consulate General in Jerusalem are not able to provide consular assistance in Gaza or on the high seas or coastal waters.”

  17. optimax says:

    Martin Luther broke the law using non-violence. The American rebels broke the law of the land and used violence to break away from England. Jews broke the law and used violence to establish Israel. The Palestinians break the law using both peaceful and violent means. It’s up to each person to decide when a natural law supercedes a man made one. I think it’s hypocritical for an Israel supporter to condemn members of the flotilla for putting humanitarian concerns above man made laws. Man can only flourish by breaking and destroying unjust laws.

    • Citizen says:

      Pretty elementary, optimax–Jesus broke the law by kicking the moneychangers out of the temple, but he did not break the spirit of the law. Nothing’s changed. Jesus was a rebel against the Jewish Establishment; today that establisment is a full part of the US Establishment. Both the government leaders of the US and those of Israel need to be kicked out of the halls of power.

      • Lightbringer says:

        Wrong.
        “DO NOT THINK that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I DID NOT come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one JOT or one TITTLE will BY NO MEANS pass from the law till all is fulfilled. (Matthew 5:17-18, NKJV)!

        Jesus broke a custom – a tradition, if you like, but not the law by any means.

        It amazes me how little people know about the most serious matters they discuss.

  18. optimax says:

    Citizen,
    Yes, we need to kick the moneychangers out of our democracy, where they sacrifice our constitutional protections and well being on the alter of greed for their personal glory.

    • Citizen says:

      Optimax, I think the Michelle Bachmann types didn’t get that memo from their bible, even though it’s clear as a bell in there–I mean how often did Jesus get violent? Still they totally miss the significance of that episode, almost as much as they miss the man-god’s message to turn the other cheek–actually, it’s amazing how those types consistently miss the same things in their own bible.

  19. optimax says:

    Citizen, I don’t consider Bachman, Hagee and the other Zionist-Christians to be Christians. They are stuck in the Old Testament and can’t get out.

    • Citizen says:

      I don’t disagree with you, optimax, and I think many Christians think the Christian Zionists are, essentially, apostates. Such is the history of religious sects; one jumps to my mind of relatively recent vintage, both as to the founding of the religion, and later sect divergence: The Church of LDS, The Church of FLDS. Problem partially is that more traditional Christian groups are not as narrowly focused as the Christian Zionists, which parallels traditional Judiasm and Zionism, yes? Similarly, a typical US congress person is not focused as narrowly as a peer who has Israel First as his/her top priority. You can start a fire with the vast remote sun itself by focusing a small glass lens on a tiny spot that otherwise would never even smoke.

  20. Lightbringer says:

    “… and I think many Christians think the Christian Zionists are, essentially, apostates.”
    Yeah.
    Apostates.
    Heretics.

    Fire? or rack?

    Tomas Torquemada should rest in peace – his business is in good hands.

    • optimax says:

      The Spanish Inquisition was a combination of religious fanaticism and rabid nationalism. Thanks, Lightbringer, that’s a good analogy for a teeny-weeny state in the ME that says their biggy-wiggy God gave it to them. A country that has spawned a thousand mini-Torquemadas arresting, torturing and murdering those who aren’t ethnically and religiously pure. Bachman, Hagee and the like are emissaries for this state and, as such, are destructive to my country and are apostates, just like their Jewish comrades.

  21. optimax says:

    Apostate is the correct term for someone who has abandoned Christian principles. In fact, Torquemada would be an apostate for abandoning Christ’s teachings.

  22. This is a test of the HTML link function:

    A link to Haaretz is here.

Leave a Reply