All Israeli kindergarteners are required to sing the national anthem– except for ‘Arab sector’ children

According to a July Haaretz article, Israeli education authorities have implemented a new rule that kindergarten teachers must have their classes sing the Hatikvah, Israel’s national anthem, every week. This generated some debate in Israel about forced patriotism that poses an interesting contrast with the US, where for many decades, classrooms have included daily recitals of patriotic songs and/or the Pledge of Allegiance. There was little or no attention to the uncontroversial exception made for the “Arab sector.”

According to the Education Ministry, the directives will not be implemented in the Arab sector....The ultimate goals of the plan are to strengthen the pupils' Jewish and Zionist values, and to improve their scholastic achievements.

On its face, this makes perfect sense. The Hatikvah speaks of the yearning of the Jewish soul for return to and control over Zion. It would be incongruous and even cruel to compel non-Jewish youngsters to mouth such words sanctifying the spirit of their Jewish neighbors above their own, especially where that Jewish yearning is to control the land on which Palestinians have lived for many centuries.

Surely it would be appalling to prescribe this weekly dose of glorification of Jewish nationhood for those who cannot share in its meaning. But is it any less appalling that Palestinian children are unable to share in the national anthem of their own country? These children, like several generations before them, are destined to live their entire lives as citizens of a state dedicated to the aspirations of another people, a group from which they are excluded. It’s not just the ritual song-singing; the Hatikvah is the perfect national anthem, embodying the entire noble mythology of the state, from centuries of yearning for Zion to the 20th century realization of the dream.

Among all the indignities faced by non-Jewish citizens in Israel, the inability of their children to partake in this dubious “patriotic” exercise surely does not rank near the top. Nevertheless, it is the perfect symbol of the irreconcilable conflict between the “Jewish State” and the fundamental principle of equality for all citizens that is considered inviolable in every other national context.

Some Zionists simply deny the undeniable. Israel is a “Jewish State” that provides absolute equality for Jews and non-Jews. Even Israel’s founding document, the Declaration of Independence of 1948, guarantees “full and equal citizenship” to Arab citizens. Where’s the contradiction? Others acknowledge that Jewish citizens are “more equal than others,” to paraphrase Orwell, but insist that it is natural to bestow greater rights on Jewish citizens of a Jewish State. Those “Arabs” who don’t like it have 22 other Arab states they can move to.

Then there are the liberal Zionists, people like Peter Beinart and Jerome Slater, who regret having to adopt this singular exception to their liberal principles favoring equality for all, regardless of ancestry. I see no reason to question their sincerity, or their hope that the inevitable inequalities between Jews and non-Jews can be minimized, despite Israel’s failure to do so for 63 years and its current freight-train movement in the wrong direction. But even if liberal Zionists can justify, in this one instance, a state favoring some citizens over others based upon characteristics of birth, can they imagine any circumstances in which the victims of such inequality would accept inferior status as their unfortunate lot in life? Who among us would agree to live under such circumstances? Is it not unseemly to reluctantly accept privileges for one’s own ethnic group?

This kindergarten problem will remain as long as Israel remains a “Jewish State,” even if Israel’s military occupation over millions of Palestinian non-citizens ended tomorrow and a real Palestinian State emerged. Of course, the real debate there involves the question of precisely how many nails Israel has hammered into the coffin of the two-state solution. Israel’s Palestinian citizenry will continue to be a tolerated (some times more than others) minority living as a permanent underclass in a foreign country, even though their own roots to the land go back many centuries. Israel’s non-Jewish citizens will be outsiders, and their children will know it from an early age, whenever they hear their Jewish counterparts sing the national anthem that they cannot share.

About David Samel

Attorney in New York City
Posted in Israel/Palestine

{ 9 comments... read them below or add one }

  1. Citizen says:

    Hey, didn’t the US “solve” essentially the same type of problem by excluding the US Pledge Of Allegiance in US public schools?

  2. Shmuel says:

    Thanks, David. You are right that this new directive highlights the distinction in Israel between first and second class citizens, on the basis of ethnicity. I don’t think there was any consideration involved in the decision to exclude Arab schools, but a combination of cowardice (or realpolitik, if you prefer) – knowing that an attempt to force Palestinian children to sing Hatikvah would meet with fierce opposition – and a worldview that considers only Jews, and especially Zionist Jews, “real” citizens.

  3. Bumblebye says:

    Mandating recitation/singing of political slogans, anthems, whatever in schools is not education. but indoctrination.
    And I dislike the fact that schools here in the UK are mandated to teach religions with and *emphasis* on christianity. And hold a religiously based assembly. YUK.

  4. radii says:

    WWHhaat? israel misses a chance to further humiliate the Palestinians by not forcing Palestinian children to sing the zionist national anthem? Who’s slacking off at the Cruelty Ministry over there?

  5. Rusty Pipes says:

    We need a replay of the little kid saying, Our problem is PR

  6. Why don’t they just put up a big neon sign in all the Palestinian schools: You Don’t Count. Your culture is anathema to us, your history here embarrasses us, we don’t want to spend any state money on you, we won’t allow you decent housing or freedom of movement, and we will legislate to ensure that is so. In short, as far as we’re concerned you DO NOT EXIST. Except that is, when we want to pretend we are ‘multicultural’ in which case we will wheel you out as prime exhibits.

  7. Daniel Rich says:

    Q: On its face, this makes perfect sense. The Hatikvah speaks of the yearning of the Jewish soul for return to and control over Zion.

    R: According to the movie ‘Matrix’ we’re all supposed to protect zion or is that only because of the Wachowski brothers’ need to comply [with whatever]?

  8. john h says:

    “the Hatikvah is the perfect national anthem, embodying the entire noble mythology of the state, from centuries of yearning for Zion to the 20th century realization of the dream. that Jewish yearning is to control the land on which Palestinians have lived for many centuries. Those “Arabs” who don’t like it have 22 other Arab states they can move to.”

    Yeah, such a noble dream, what has always been a nightmare for “those Arabs” and what will become one for those who think it is realized. The tsunami is on its way.

    Zion, Jerusalem, Israel, the physical is not their true meaning or intention. The Zionist dream was invented by people who had no time for the God that gave each to point his people to him alone.

    Zionists were and are those who gave up waiting, gave up believing, gave up their true heritage. Like Esau, they will find they sold their birthright for something that lasts only a moment in time.

    Today, for Zionists and Christian Zionists, Israel has, in effect, become the new golden calf, the new idolatry.