News

Goldstone lesson: what’s so great about international law?

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

What Richard Goldstone published on the Times op-ed page yesterday should not be surprising to either his defenders or detractors.  He has never made a secret of being a progressive Zionist, and if he went a step further than the average J Street operative in his desperation to save Israel as a Jewish state, it’s because he spent much more time around international institutions and was thus all the more alarmed.  There is no reason to believe that the things he is saying now are any different from what he believed when he wrote the report on Cast Lead.

But this also speaks to a larger point – international “law” and institutions are the problem, not the solution.  Israel owes its very existence to a mandate of “international law”, and is the only country to invoke it in its declaration of independence.  If international institutions, and the UN in particular, are eager to admit a “state of Palestine”, it is because they are desperate to implement a two-state solution for the sake of their own credibility. 

Richard Goldstone is first and foremost a dedicated partisan and apparatchik of the international system and its ultimate triumph, and Israel remains the tabernacle of that system because, sharing the same sacred story as the American empire, it is the ultimate symbol of its own goodness.  That this system has to such an extent been turned against Israel (and the United States) is but a natural irony of history. 

Put not your faith in the princes of the UN, but in the power lying in the streets of Palestine, Egypt, Bahrain, and beyond.

13 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“. Israel owes its very existence to a mandate of “international law”, and is the only country to invoke it in its declaration of independence. If international institutions, and the UN in particular, are eager to admit a “state of Palestine”, it is because they are desperate to implement a two-state solution for the sake of their own credibility.”

And time for a two state solution is fading quickly

Goldstone: “Blacks critically injured in car accidents were left to bleed to death if there was no “black” ambulance to rush them to a “black” hospital. “White” hospitals were prohibited from saving their lives.” His willingness to ignore the similarities is shameful, Infringement of the Right to Medical Treatment The army’s severe restrictions on Palestinian movement in the West Bank gravely affect the ability of Palestinians to obtain proper medical treatment. The hundreds of physical… Read more »

There are parts of “Jerusalem” where the ambulance dispatcher asks, “Is the victim a Jew or Arab?” If an Arab, the ambulance is denied, but an “Arab ambulance” isn’t allowed into the area.

Prominent individuals who know what apartheid is sure disagree with Goldstone.

Archbishop Tutu
http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/study_res/zionism/apartheid_tutu2.htm

Archbishop Tutu Stands For Justice Against Apartheid Israel
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/08/archbishop-tutu-stands-
with-marrickville-against-apartheid-israel/

Nelson Mandela
http://www.endtheoccupation.org/downloads/mandela.pdf

The Elders
http://www.theelders.org/article/elders-next-move

I agree with Jack that Goldstone has been consistent in his values and statements, even if it differed from the statements of those that would use his work for their own political objectives.

I disagree that
“Richard Goldstone is first and foremost a dedicated partisan”.

My sense is that he is just a man, a principled, informed, dedicated man.

Dedicated to family, community, Jewish community, law, international law, alike.

Not one, not the other.