‘NYT’ quietly buries Ben Ehrenreich’s piece

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

As far as I can tell Ben Ehrenreich’s NYT Magazine cover story last Sunday (about popular resistance in the occupied village of Nabi Saleh) has vanished into the ether. It was studiously ignored, not least by the NYT, which wrote no editorial about it, and was then overshadowed by Obama’s trip.

This Sunday there is an interview with Mary Robinson in the magazine and several of the questions deal with the anti-semitism of Iran–the reporter informs us that Iran wants to wipe Israel off the map.  Maybe in a week or two there will be letters in the Magazine about Ehrenreich’s story, and then it will be as though it was never written.

On the editorial page today the NYT writes about the Turkey/Israel lovefest, and tells us that a UN commission found that the Gaza blockade was legal–nothing about the politics behind that or the lack of logic in the reasoning.  I remember Mondoweiss dissecting that issue and I participated and even I’ve forgotten most of the details.  If someone asked I wouldn’t be able to do more than stutter a little about why the NYT is being disingenuous.

I think it’s usually 2 steps forward and 3 steps back at the Times. They publish someone like Ehrenreich, just like they published Edward Said many years ago, but then they go on as though these pieces never existed and they move right back to the usual hasbara.  Ehrenreich’s piece was window-dressing.   
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The NYT doing what the NYT does best: looking after the best interests of its Zionist masters. That story must have slept thru the cracks but the error was quickly corrected by the servants and dutiful protectors of lies and deceit. Long live freedom of speech, democracy and our fifth column!

“The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.”~ David Ben-Gurion

Here’s to irony.

Publishing the piece provides the NYT with the cloak of relevance it requires to remain legitimate, to appear to be up-to-speed on the reality on the ground, to remain relevant and in sync with alternative media sources online and off the mainstream. It gives it the cloak of having a competitive edge. Ultimately, however, it remains a propaganda outlet that serves Israeli interests. I just laugh sometimes when after publishing some truth, a mainstream publication… Read more »

A truly “beyond the Pale” Jew whose opinions must be ignored at all costs.

“I think it’s usually 2 steps forward and 3 steps back at the Times.” It depends on what subject we’re talking about. They have, like most of the liberal establishment, become vehemently anti-union for example. But when it comes to Israel, it’s more like 2 steps forward, 1 step back. If you compare their coverage today with even five years ago, it is no comparison. To even publish his piece was very daring, as was… Read more »