Trending Topics:

Israel’s painful concessions are like Iran’s nuclear weapon — a fantasy

Israel/Palestine
on 6 Comments
An entry from Aleksandr Kalinin in our. He explains, "I did a different take on it, namely what WE see when he does his performance, we don't pay attention to his drawing, we see nothing, rather we see him as the cartoon/clown." (Image: Aleksandr Kalinin)

An entry from Aleksandr Kalinin in our Netanyahu graphic series. Kalinin explains, “I did a different take on it, namely what WE see when he does his performance, we don’t pay attention to his drawing, we see nothing, rather we see him as the cartoon/clown.” (Image: Aleksandr Kalinin)

This is part of Marc H. Ellis’s “Exile and the Prophetic” feature for Mondoweiss. To read the entire series visit the archive page.

An original take on Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech before the United Nations yesterday is hard to find.  It isn’t easy to creatively analyze United Nations’ kitsch.

Kitsch can be sentimental.  Netanyahu’s speech had that.  Kitsch can be vulgar.  Netanyahu covered that angle, too.  Netanyahu left his cartoon props from last year’s speech behind.  Thus he didn’t employ another aspect of kitsch – tackiness.  Or did he?

Iran, Iran, Iran.  Without one nuclear weapon and without any real sense of how close Iran is to that one nuclear weapon, nowhere in his address did Netanyahu allude to Israel’s ultimate threat – to retaliate with its many nuclear weapons.

Why not threaten to use Israel’s ace in the hole?  The rhetorical drama alone would be worth it.  Because Israel won’t admit it has one nuclear weapon, let alone the scores everyone knows it has.

On the Palestinians, the real issue, Netanyahu continued in a rote mode, contrasting his honesty with Iran’s dishonesty:

Israel welcomes engagement with the wider Arab world. We hope that our common interests and common challenges will help us forge a more peaceful future. And Israel’s — continues to seek an historic compromise with our Palestinian neighbors, one that ends our conflict once and for all. We want peace based on security and mutual recognition, in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the Jewish state of Israel. I remain committed to achieving an historic reconciliation and building a better future for Israelis and Palestinians alike.

Now, I have no illusions about how difficult this will be to achieve. Twenty years ago, the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians began. Six Israeli prime ministers, myself included, have not succeeded at achieving peace with the Palestinians. My predecessors were prepared to make painful concessions. So am I. But so far the Palestinian leaders haven’t been prepared to offer the painful concessions they must make in order to end the conflict.

For peace to be achieved, the Palestinians must finally recognize the Jewish state, and Israel’s security needs must be met.

Israel’s painful concessions are like Iran’s one nuclear weapon, a fantasy concocted for an audience that doesn’t believe a word Netanyahu says.  Netanyahu’s so-called concessions are without specifics – as in where are Israel’s borders, what will happen with Israel’s settlements and how a Palestinian state can be achieved where there is so little land, no continuity, no military and no foreign policy allowed.  Israel’s concessions are unilateral power grabs.

As for history, why bother.  Palestinians are without a history in Netanyahu’s rendition of Israel’s existence.  But Jews, why yes, Jews have a history, one filtered through the Bible and Netanyahu’s grandfather, Nathan, who way back when was assaulted by a mob.

Here it is, in two parts, Netanyahu’s understanding of Jewish history.  In the beginning:

We are an ancient people. We date back nearly 4,000 years to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. We have journeyed through time. We’ve overcome the greatest of adversities. And we re-established our sovereign state in our ancestral homeland, the land of Israel.

At the end:

Ladies and gentlemen, one cold day in the late 19th century, my grandfather Nathan and his younger brother Judah were standing in a railway station in the heart of Europe. They were seen by a group of anti-Semitic hoodlums who ran towards them waving clubs, screaming “Death to the Jews.”

My grandfather shouted to his younger brother to flee and save himself, and he then stood alone against the raging mob to slow it down. They beat him senseless, they left him for dead, and before he passed out, covered in his own blood, he said to himself “What a disgrace, what a disgrace. The descendants of the Maccabees lie in the mud powerless to defend themselves.”

He promised himself then that if he lived, he would take his family to the Jewish homeland and help build a future for the Jewish people. I stand here today as Israel’s prime minister because my grandfather kept that promise.

And so many other Israelis have a similar story, a parent or a grandparent who fled every conceivable oppression and came to Israel to start a new life in our ancient homeland. Together we’ve transformed a bludgeoned Jewish people, left for dead, into a vibrant, thriving nation, defending itself with the courage of modern Maccabees, developing limitless possibilities for the future.

In our time the Biblical prophecies are being realized. As the prophet Amos said, they shall rebuild ruined cities and inhabit them. They shall plant vineyards and drink their wine. They shall till gardens and eat their fruit. And I will plant them upon their soil never to be uprooted again.

Netanyahu’s history, such as it is, is so selective it begs the question of what history is and how history should be communicated by the leader of a nation.  For Netanyahu, it’s Abraham, Isaac – and Nathan.

Perhaps Netanyahu should expand his address and publish a book length text – Netanyahu’s Idiot’s Guide to Jewish History.

Stories from the Bible and family humiliations hardly add up to statecraft.  Israel, with its nuclear stockpile – and its chemical weapons’ arsenal as well – isn’t standing up to a raging mob. From the Palestinian perspective, Israel is the raging mob.  Netanyahu is the leader of the mob.

Palestinians experience daily the “bludgeoned Jewish people, left for dead” transformed into a “thriving nation, defending itself with the courage of modern Maccabees.” Israel is a nation that deliberately and systematically forecloses for Palestinians what Netanyahu’s family wanted desperately.

“Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel have come home never to be uprooted again.”

To permanently uproot others?

Marc H. Ellis
About Marc H. Ellis

Marc H. Ellis is Professor of History and Jewish Studies and Director of the Center for the Study of the Global Prophetic. His latest book is Finding Our Voice: Embodying the Prophetic and Other Misadventures.

Other posts by .


Posted In:

6 Responses

  1. pabelmont
    pabelmont
    October 2, 2013, 11:19 am

    Marc Ellis,

    My topic is “when is a non-concession nevertheless a concession.”

    I believe that folks who take over someone else’s property by tricks, by force, by crime, by war, by terrorism, by superior economic power, by anything at all — and thereafter hold it long enough — actually come to believe that they hold it “as of right”. As an example, take the average American’s feeling that our land is “ours” and not the proper property of the Native Americans from whom we took it.

    Therefore, in any such case, the idea of giving some of it back does seem like a concession and like a sacrifice, especially if the idea of returning property has not been brought up until recently and after long ownership.

    Now, in the matter of Palestine, there has been near-constant complaint by Palestinians about their usurped land, since 1948, and since 1967. These complaints — sometimes emphasized by use of armed force — serve to remind Israel that the deal is not a “done deal” as far as the Palestinians are concerned. Israel is “on notice” that Palestinians claim the whole land — or part of it — for their own, as original owners usurped unfairly. But one cannot expect Israelis to agree, nor yet to “internalize” these Palestinian feelings. It would negate far too much.

    So although N’yahu’s “concessions” may be spurious — both as to his own feelings (if politicians as such actually feel anything) and as to the actual extent of his offerings — whatever he is offering, even if nothing much, may well seem like major concessions to Israelis-on-the-street who have been taught that they own the whole she-bang, not least the religious believers who hold the idea that God promised the whole she-bang (and more) to the Jews (who they take themselves to be, never mind all the rest of us).

  2. German Lefty
    German Lefty
    October 2, 2013, 1:26 pm

    Israel’s painful concessions are like Iran’s nuclear weapon — a fantasy

    Oh, I absolutely LOVE that title!

  3. James Canning
    James Canning
    October 2, 2013, 2:26 pm

    All Arab countries are willing to accept Jews having as their “home”, 78% of what was Palestine. That isn’t enough, for Netanyahu.

  4. just
    just
    October 2, 2013, 10:51 pm

    Bravo to Aleksandr Kalinin.

    I don’t think that Israel has EVER made any concessions– painful or otherwise.

    And yes, Iran has no nuclear weapons program.

    • Sumud
      Sumud
      October 3, 2013, 10:39 am

      Zionists will be scarce on this thread, but I challenge anyone to name any one concession Israel has ever made in any negotiation since Oslo.

      And to be clear: a concession is not just not getting what you want, it is offering to give up something to which you are legally entitled.

      Come on folks, ye who bang on about generous offers – tell me all about them!!!

  5. amigo
    amigo
    October 3, 2013, 7:36 am

    “They beat him senseless, they left him for dead, and before he passed out, covered in his own blood, he said to himself “What a disgrace, what a disgrace. The descendants of the Maccabees lie in the mud powerless to defend themselves.”nietanyahoo

    Should read.
    “They beat him senseless,they left him for dead and before he died in a pool of blood,he said to himself, what a disgrace,what a disgrace,the descendants of the Philistines AND the Canaanites lie in the mud powerless to defend themselves.

    So nietanyahoo is saying Jews should be heroes and resist but Palestinians are terrorists if they resist.

    The man is a racist bigot who needs to be dragged to the Hague to face his accusers and victims.

    Lucky for him , I don,t get to pronounce sentence.The Greater Israel and the Macabees will be the last thing on his mind.

Leave a Reply