Trending Topics:

Kerry’s billions: US economic plans for Palestine place investment over freedom

on 68 Comments
Mahmoud Abbas,  John Kerry and Shimon Peres shake hands at the World Economic Forum on the Middle East and North Africa 2013, in Amman, Jordan. May 26, 2013. (Photo: FLASH90)

Mahmoud Abbas, John Kerry and Shimon Peres shake hands at the World Economic Forum on the Middle East and North Africa 2013, in Amman, Jordan. May 26, 2013. (Photo: FLASH90)

Since May 2013, there has been intense debate about US Secretary of State John Kerry’s economic plan for the occupied Palestinian territories. The plan – known as the Palestine Economic Initiative (PEI) – aims to develop the economy of the West Bank and Gaza over the next three years, as a prerequisite for a political settlement to end the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. However, very few of those welcoming or criticizing the plan know anything concrete about it. Hence I call it the ‘invisible plan’. On a trip to the West Bank in December 2013, I met Palestinian and international officials and diplomats who are involved directly or indirectly in the PEI. Their message was that there will not be, as many expect, a third intifada (uprising), but something very different: an ‘investment intifada’.

The PEI is invisible not only because it was prepared by a team of ‘international experts’, but also because the Palestinian people, whose economic development is at stake, are the last to know about it. This is not new. Development planning since the establishment of the Palestinian Authority (PA) in 1993 has followed a non-participatory, top-down approach that conforms to the policy perceptions of the international financial institutions, and marginalizes the very people it is supposed to benefit. The invisibility of the plan is particularly problematic this time because the PEI promises an unattainable outcome (a 50% increase in Palestinian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over three years, a cut of two-thirds in unemployment rates and a virtual doubling of the Palestinian median wage). The disappointment this is likely to generate could produce unpleasant consequences. Many ordinary citizens I met in the West Bank fear that the PEI could be the biggest sell-out since the Oslo accords of the 1990s.

As for the ‘investment intifada’, the interviews I conducted revealed how desperate local and international officials are to create tangible benefits on the ground. Over the next year and half, officials expect that Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza will ‘enjoy major economic benefits to facilitate and accelerate the political settlement’. The rationale is clear: offer the Palestinians better economic conditions, keep them quiet, and after three years they will make further political compromises. This approach has failed over the last two decades, but it seems no one is learning from past mistakes. However, major transformations have taken place since 2005 which will affect the peace-dividend rationale – namely, the security collaboration between the PA and Israel, and the PA’s increasing authoritarianism. The Palestinian security forces are now better prepared to protect any political agreement. However, authoritarianism and oppression will always be contested, as many young Palestinian activists affirmed in my conversations with them. They insist that a ‘peace dividend’ can’t buy freedom or justice.

The PEI will reportedly solicit around $4 billion in aid and investment, and allocate the money to such sectors as construction and housing, agriculture, tourism, information technology, building materials, power and energy, water, and light manufacturing. However, a senior Palestinian official told me, ‘We expect the figure to reach $11 billion, instead of $4 billion. We are not asking for favours, we are offering our market, economic resources and cheap labour for international investment.’ Clearly, $11 billion of investment is a far cry from $4 billion. The absorptive capacity of the Palestinian economy would need to be changed dramatically before the injection of these sums. Otherwise, this will be a perfect recipe for yet more wasted billions that will entrench the complex network of corruption between Palestinians and Israelis, and the PEI ‘will be nothing but a palliative for a dangerous disease: the continuation of the occupation’, as a former Palestinian planning minister wrote recently in the New York Times.

Radical and innovative change will require a dramatic shift in the overall framework for aid and economic development. It also requires moving beyond the territorial classification of the Oslo accords (Areas A, B and C). Palestinians should not be pleading with the Israeli authorities to allow the donor community and international investors to invest in Area C, which comprises 61% of the West Bank. Instead their efforts should be geared towards resisting the territorial fragmentation that Oslo created and the Israeli military occupation has further entrenched. The need is to confront the occupying power rather than obligingly following its rules: to change not merely the rules of the game, but the game itself.

A new narrative is emerging which presents Kerry’s billions as an investment, not as aid. Those who have devised the PEI want to market it to governments, donors, multinational corporations, Israel and the public as an innovative plan. Indeed Tony Blair, the Quartet’s representative, stated naively that ‘this is the first time in history that such a fresh, comprehensive, innovative and broad approach has been taken’.

All this is problematic for several reasons. First, it is astonishing that the PA leadership are still dependent on the US and keen to maintain its exclusive sponsorship of the peace process. PA leaders even believe in the myth that the US is interested in pressuring Israel as a way to fulfill Palestinian demands. Second, the PA’s prioritization of the needs of the international community, as opposed to the needs of the Palestinian people, has not only eroded the PA’s legitimacy at home, but brought about the failure of the PA on all fronts. Twenty years on from the Oslo accords, it is failing to bring Palestinians closer to their national goals; in fact, just the opposite. Also, despite the $24.6 billion of international aid received over the last two decades, aid has not brought peace, development or security – let alone justice – for the Palestinian people.

Third, the PEI is not designed to address the imbalances of power between the colonizer and colonized, but instead relies on the goodwill and co-operation of Israel. Thus it is Israel that will decide whether or not to give the green light to the PEI. The historical evidence suggests it will ease some restrictions and allow additional major economic activities in the occupied territories, but will never jeopardize its ‘strategic goals’. What remains clear is that dependency on the colonial occupying power to develop an independent, viable, and prosperous Palestinian economy is surreal.

Finally, while the US dominates the peace industry and its economic dimension, the European Union (EU) is also keen to play a part. However, the EU’s potential contribution is fraught with contradictions. It has failed to become a major peace broker, despite the leverage of its aid to the Palestinians and its preferential trade relations with Israel. On one hand, it has issued guidelines banning funding for projects in Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, but on the other hand it has upgraded its trade relations with Israel. It announced recently that a generous aid package would be offered to both Palestinians and Israelis if they reach a peace agreement. It would also upgrade both parties to privileged-partner status. The sticks-and-carrots game played by the EU reinforces the conventional wisdom in the occupied territories that the ‘the US decides, the World Bank leads, the EU pays, the UN feeds’.

John Kerry has called his plan ‘a new model for development’. Tony Blair has claimed it is unique in history. However, I am afraid that the plan (and the whole development industry in the occupied territories) will remain like teenage sex – everybody claims they are doing it, but most people aren’t, and those that are, are doing it very badly.

This article was originally published in The Middle East in London magazine

Alaa Tartir

Alaa Tartir is a Palestinian writer and researcher who is working on a PhD at the LSE. He is also the program director of Al-Shabaka: The Palestinian Policy Network.

Other posts by .

Posted In:

68 Responses

  1. ritzl on January 31, 2014, 10:10 pm

    Thanks for the article. Excellent insight.

    …a 50% increase in Palestinian Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over three years, a cut of two-thirds in unemployment rates and a virtual doubling of the Palestinian median wage…

    – The only way that can even possibly happen is if Israel:
    A) Eliminates all checkpoints; allows complete freedom of movement.
    B) Eliminates all structure demolitions, personal and economic; no going backward.
    C) Eliminates all export restrictions and most import restrictions;
    unfettered access to non-Israeli markets.
    D) Eliminates all settler terrorism; positive, encouraging, stable environment.
    E) Equalizes water access and rates; water availability equals economic growth.
    F) Funds flow through Palestinian banks; domestic banking infrastructure
    required for long-term viability.

    Ergo the world’s shortest feasibility study ever:

    Q: Are you, Israel, prepared to do all/any of the above?

    A: No./Let’s negotiate.

    FEASIBILITY: Negative.

    – The numbers only make sense with aid flowing:
    > ~4M people
    > ~$4B aid per year ($12B total)
    > ~$1,000 per person per year

    > Current WB p/c GDP is ~$2500
    > Year 3 goal/outcome: ~$3750 (with aid and some modest ripple effect)
    > Year 4 outcome: ~$2750 (subtracting aid)

    Long-term wages and employment are even more squirrely to manage, especially in a service/agri economy with a completely gutted infrastructure and no reliable markets.

    This is napkin-ish analysis, but these short-term improvements seem completely aid-dependent. Why not just give the Palestinians $12B to meet all the goals, define them as “state-ready,” and get on with the charade.

    – Gaza doesn’t seem to be included. No surprise there.

    Thanks again for the insights.

    • seafoid on January 31, 2014, 11:38 pm

      Absolute horseshit from Kerry

      It comes back to Beinart’s ur- problem. There is no way to triangulate between justice and oppression.

      • Walid on February 1, 2014, 1:15 am

        Seafoid, your calling up of Shir Hever here is most apt; considering the Palestinians would be Israel’s captive market for ever and ever, this 4 billion or imaginary 11 billion investment would be great for Israel.

        Whatever became of Netanyahu’s “economic peace” that was equally touted by Fayyad? Shir Hever exposed both as frauds, the first for having fudged the numbers to pull the wool over the Europeans’ eyes and the second for having fudged the overall results by premising them on the city of Ramallah’s mini-boom results. Now Kerry, Netanyahu and Blair are back to repeat the same failed gimmick.

      • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 2:07 am

        The bots owe the Palestininians USD50 bn minimum Walid. The liability is way bigger than zionism’s free cash.
        This why the bots need peace more than the sha’ab do. But they are too stupid and too greedy.

        BTW I bet kerry’s 4bn will come entirely from Galut. Zionism doesn’t do accountability. When TSHTF this will be ahum al shay bil hikaya. Ben Gurion never understood the importance of doing business honestly. He was never an olive farmer LOL.

      • Citizen on February 1, 2014, 11:26 pm

        @ seafoid
        Yep, at least USD50 bn; that’s the sum of Bernie Maddow’s cost to his investors. Maybe Kerry could get Bernie out of his soft prison cell and have him lead the plan to make the Palestinian people able to live like semi-normal folks?

      • ritzl on February 1, 2014, 3:13 pm

        Yep. And thanks for the link. Looks like a good read.

    • on February 1, 2014, 10:24 pm

      just started watching the beginning of “gone with the wind” and mr. o’hara lecturing scarlet on how land is the most important thing in the world, the only thing worth dying for.
      right on palestine and yassir arafat!
      carry on

  2. MahaneYehude1 on January 31, 2014, 11:18 pm

    @Alaa Tartir:

    Also, despite the $24.6 billion of international aid received over the last two decades, aid has not brought peace, development or security – let alone justice – for the Palestinian people.

    I have very simple questions to you: Where is the money? Why there is no Palestinian SodaStream, for instance?

    • annie on February 1, 2014, 1:25 am

      palestinians are not allowed permits to build. most of the land allocated for industry is limited to jewish settlements.

      they are also not allowed to make decisions wrt imports exports. there’s no competition with israeli/jewish financial interests. when palestinians go it alone it gets bombed or bulldozed.

      • mcohen on February 1, 2014, 1:48 am


      • annie on February 1, 2014, 2:19 am

        no it’s not,listen to the video starting around 13 minutes, listen to the whole interview w/shir hever. there’s lots more where this comes from.

      • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 4:31 am

        This is about rugby but it is also about Mondo. Everything is connected. Everyone is connected.

        “We need all the good things we did against New Zealand in terms of our accuracy and detail, but that doggedness that was there in 2009 needs to be there as well.”

        (2009 was the year Ireland won the 6 nations Grand Slam, beating everyone else, for the first time since 1948

        Here’s an American way of saying it

        “From the I-95 to the Autobahn
        I dig grooves and rhyme tracks like the art of form
        The rain might stop but that don’t mean the water’s gone
        It’s kind of deep huh? well this is that sort of song
        The kind of shit that will make your whole life montage
        To recognize you ain’t that small or that large
        To make you understate, humble, yet headstrong
        Enough to tell a motherfucker when he’s dead wrong”

      • Talkback on February 1, 2014, 6:19 am

        Here’s more of your Antigentile Apartheid Junta “bullshit” regarding Gaza exports:

      • MahaneYehude1 on February 1, 2014, 3:04 am


        OK, assuming you are right, where is the money? I think you know the answer.

      • annie on February 1, 2014, 3:49 pm

        mehane, what do you mean by ‘ok’? the implication is that you’re following the conversation and responding to my point. the video i linked to in my comment addresses and answers your question. did you bother watching it or are you just playing tag?

        and if that’s not enough for you try reading the financial times article phil and james wrote about today the financial times knows a little about finance, people who write for them can’t just spew nonsense.

        High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights.

        It is disingenuous to romanticise settlement enterprises. The occupation imprisons thousands of the Palestinians’ young men, gives their land and water to settlers, demolishes their houses and partitions the remaining territory with scores of checkpoints and segregated roads. There are almost no basic foundations for an economy. The way to create Palestinian jobs is to end the occupation and let Palestinians build those foundations – not to build “bridges to peace” on other people’s land without their permission.

      • MahaneYehude1 on February 1, 2014, 4:40 pm


        I am not surprised when you all attack Israel and I said my opinion many times. Only one small thing I can’t understand: Where is the internal criticism? What’s the problem to say something negative on the PA leaders? Any kid in the West Bank knows about the corruption, the billions of dollars that were evaporated and the very high standards of living of several corrupted leaders. Why always, when there is a post about finance issues, you all ignore this small fact?

        BTW, I watched in the first time the video of this nice guy, Israel-lover, Shir Hever. Thanks for the link and for the opportunity to listen to his music. I asked simple question and didn’t say even one word about the settlements and the “bridge of peace”, so I am not the correct address.

      • amigo on February 1, 2014, 12:53 pm

        Annie , ask mahane where the 125 billion given to Israel since 1949 is.

        Mostly in the illegal settlements.

        Here is an accounting of the aid given to the Rogue nation who builds illegal settlements on stolen lands.

        “The current estimate by the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs of cumulative total U.S. direct aid to Israel is $123.202 billion, updating the figure in our November 2008 issue. Because parts of U.S. aid to Israel are buried in the budgets of various U.S. agencies or in a form not easily quantified—such as the early disbursement of aid, giving Israel a direct benefit of interest income and the U.S. Treasury a corresponding loss—it is virtually impossible to arrive at an exact dollar amount.

        Our latest estimate is a conservative, defensible accounting of U.S. direct aid to Israel. It does not include the indirect benefits to Israel resulting from U.S. aid, nor the substantial indirect or consequential cost to the U.S. as a result of its blind support for Israel. Most significantly, perhaps, it does not include the costs resulting from the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq—hundreds of billions of dollars, thousands of U.S. and allied casualties, and untold tens of thousands of Iraqi killed and wounded—which is widely believed in the Arab world, and by many Americans as well, to have been undertaken for the benefit of Israel.

        Among the real benefits to Israel that are not counted as a direct cost to the U.S. taxpayer is the provision allowing Israel to spend 26.3 percent of each year’s military aid in Israel rather than from American companies (no other recipient of U.S. military aid gets this benefit), which has resulted in an increasingly sophisticated Israeli defense industry. As a result, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), between 2001 and 2008 Israel was the seventh-largest arms exporter to the world, with total sales of $9.9 billion. Also in contrast with other countries receiving U.S. military aid, who must purchase through the Department of Defense (DOD), Israel deals directly with the U.S. companies, with no DOD review”

        More here,

        it,s time the mehanes were expelled from here.Their lies and blatant hypocrisy are getting tiresome.

      • annie on February 1, 2014, 3:51 pm

        yeah, there is also the cheery news USAID to palestine built the apartheid roads. it’s like talking to brick walls.

      • MahaneYehude1 on February 1, 2014, 4:41 pm

        it’s time the mehanes were expelled from here.Their lies and blatant hypocrisy are getting tiresome.

      • gamal on February 1, 2014, 8:02 pm

        You on the road to Damascus?

    • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 2:13 am

      Ask shir hever. The system is designed to pauperise the goys in eretz israel so they can’t build scale business. Palestinians have the smarts. They can do it in Chile, in the UK, In the Gulf but they are not allowed to under Disneyland rules. Potatoes must come via mahane yehuda market in a jewish truck. The system is sick. The mitzvot are a total joke without Hillel treat the stranger as you would wish to be treated.

      • MahaneYehude1 on February 1, 2014, 3:20 am


        Your comment has Anti-Semitic smell and it is not the first time. Selling potatoes in Mahane Yehuda market is better than sitting all the day long and writing hatred comments. No, the system is not sick, your comments are sick and I ask you to stop with them.

      • amigo on February 1, 2014, 12:32 pm

        “Your comment has Anti-Semitic smell and it is not the first time.”the mahanes

        You zio freaks have beaten that antisemite horse to death.

        “No, the system is not sick, your comments are sick and I ask you to stop with them.”mahane 1,2 or 3???.

        No one cares what you think.

      • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 5:53 pm

        Your question about why the Palestinians have no industry was an exercise in cynicism. Jews run the system over there and thevsystem is sick. Shir Hever wrote the book. It is very depressing to see what was done in the name of the Jewish state.I honestly do not know how Judaism can extricate itself from the mess.

      • Cliff on February 1, 2014, 6:01 pm


        You are a Jewish supremacist and clearly think non-Jews are sub-human.

        To deny the discrimination of non-Jews in Israel/Palestine is proof enough of your hatred.

      • thankgodimatheist on February 1, 2014, 6:57 pm

        “Your comment has Anti-Semitic smell”
        Unfounded anti-Semitic” accusation compels an immediate ban in my book. Enough of the psychopathy..

      • Philip Munger on February 2, 2014, 4:31 am


        I agree. Totally.

      • talknic on February 1, 2014, 7:31 pm

        “Selling potatoes in Mahane Yehuda market is better than sitting all the day long and writing hatred comments.”

        Off you go spud … No one will miss your transparent propagandist drivel

      • bintbiba on February 1, 2014, 7:13 am


      • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 9:00 am

        You know Binti once I was in a sherut in Lod airport waiting to go to al Quds thinking of how not so long ago the whole parking lot had been fil reef, run by a fellahi family. And the bots came and poured concrete everywhere and it looked so solid and finalized. But they never dealt with the human consequences of what they did .

        I decided to get the biggest f8ck-off book about Israel that I could because I figured it was all going to collapse some day precisely because of this human factor.

        This is the best I could manage

        I also have a collection of NYT Israel front covers 1948-2010

        For posterity. To go with the books on Prussia.

      • just on February 1, 2014, 9:26 am

        seafoid– you are an amazing person.

        I am grateful to ‘know’ you— your point of view, your sense of humor, your breadth of knowledge and your honesty.

      • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 9:37 am


        We had our Ariel Sharon in Ireland 350 years ago. His name was Oliver Cromwell. He was a complete sociopath.

        He destroyed Irish society.
        But he couldn’t touch the music.

        And the music is there today and it is more expressive around this sort of thing than anything Beyoncé can manage.
        And if we could do it the Palestinians can do it.

        Martin Hayes is one of the best.
        I think he has a very good philosophy – starts at around 4 minutes

        We are working together, taking the memes, stretching them

        ” We are just part of that”

    • talknic on February 1, 2014, 8:36 am

      MahaneYehude1 “Where is the money?”

      $1.23 billion per year doesn’t go far providing for a population under occupation

      “Why there is no Palestinian SodaStream, for instance?”

      Being under Belligerent Occupation, having finances withheld by the occupier isn’t conducive to investment.

      You’ve got a brain. Use it for thinking. Its fun and in part what it’s for

      • MahaneYehude1 on February 1, 2014, 10:01 am


        You also have got a brain but unfortunately, very selective brain. You can all find easily the answers to my questions. Don’t try to find them in the internet, you just have to ask one little Palestinian kid in any refugee camps “where is the money?” and you will get the correct answer.

      • talknic on February 1, 2014, 1:30 pm

        @ MahaneYehude1 “You also have got a brain but unfortunately, very selective brain”

        Yes. Quite unfortunate for Israel’s propagandists. I select fact rather than idiotic Israeli apologist fallacies

        ” You can all find easily the answers to my questions”

        Your questions are stupid, transparent and typical of idiots for Israel. No wonder the Jewish state has dug itself into a foul intractable ‘illegal facts on the ground’ hole.

        ” Don’t try to find them in the internet”

        No need. Most people can divide $24.6 billion by 20 and figure $1.23 billion per year ain’t gonna go far while under an occupation that purposefully stifles the economy forces the Palestinians to buy Israeli goods thereby supporting the Israeli economy.

        “you just have to ask one little Palestinian kid in any refugee camps “where is the money?” and you will get the correct answer”

        You of course have asked one? You’ll get back to me on that one….yes?

      • bintbiba on February 1, 2014, 12:48 pm

        Seafoid, thank you for the music. O’Carolan’s Farewell to music is so beautiful… it touches a very raw nerve.

      • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 8:29 pm


        Kaman ishi

        It’s like a musical version of “Allah ya’teek al afya”

      • bintbiba on February 2, 2014, 5:44 am

        Again Thank you, Seafoid ! Much appreciated.

  3. dbroncos on February 1, 2014, 12:09 am

    Throw (American tax-payer) money at it! Make it go away! This is the Wall St. solution to I/P.

  4. Walid on February 1, 2014, 1:21 am

    Isn’t that offensive photo the same one that was used in MW’s last fund drive?

    • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 8:30 pm


      Are you still uber sceptical now the FT has shown its hand ?

  5. Tony Logan on February 1, 2014, 1:28 am

    How can anybody actually begin to believe that there is somehow a ‘ Kerry peace plan’ between Israel plus the US, with the Palestinians currently in the making, when the US is simultaneously currently waging an ideologic, economic, and military war against the Syrian and Iranian governments?

  6. Krauss on February 1, 2014, 1:48 am

    Slightly unrelated, but important.

    The fallout over Scarlett/Sodastream/Oxfam continues.

    It starts to seem to me that the pro-Sodastream forces are a key dividing line within “liberal” Zionism. The whole episode serves as a brilliant reminder of how “liberal” these Zionists actually are. I mean, even Beinart said he “wished” Scarlett hadn’t done her endorsement but failed to condemn it.

    This is what “a teachable moment” means at its most effective. The BDS/Sodastream episode has more than most episodes in recent history exposed “liberal” Zionism as the fraud that it is.

    • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 2:16 am

      I think it’s more than a teachable moment. It is the moment BDS was waiting for. Like when Tyson in the Catskills realised he could channel his potential effectively and change his fate.

    • Talkback on February 1, 2014, 6:23 am

      The whole episode serves as a brilliant reminder of how “liberal” these Zionists actually are.

      “Liberal Zionism” reminds me of “immaculate conception”. You can believe in it, but …

      • just on February 1, 2014, 8:25 am

        That’s a keeper……..

    • mcohen on February 1, 2014, 7:43 am

      Krauss says

      Sodastream is a commercial enterprise created solely to enrich its shareholders.they will adapt and move on.
      Oxfam a charity that does important work ,a beacon,was used by both sides of the festering sore called the i/p coflict for political gain
      one has to ask ,as this type of campaign picks up speed ,how many other beacons of society will be trashed by both sides in their pursuit of victory
      this will not play out like the south african sanctions but will cause a lot more collateral damage as both sides begin to dig in

      • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 12:02 pm

        Sodastream is like an antebellum slave industry. Massah is so kind to his.people and they love him because they are useless economically and have nowhere else to go. And they get whupped by the jews if they get uppity. But they are very placid when Massah is around. I really can’t believe it is 2014 and this org will be on a superbowl ad. It is as if the British East Indies company is back.

    • TheWatcherWatching on February 3, 2014, 2:53 pm

      Much like all zionists, they have loyalty first and foremost to the tribe, they are zionists first and anything else is an afterthought. The same thing for the neocon communists when the soviets turned against the jews they turned against communism, never losing there love of big government or israel.

  7. Justpassingby on February 1, 2014, 4:03 am

    Problem is that palestinians are so tied to Israel and the US, basically abbas have no power at all.

    Btw, seems like kerry and and peres giving abbas money in this picture…

  8. eGuard on February 1, 2014, 7:30 am

    US buying a “peace” treaty between Israel and X.

    How well didn’t that go for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and US.

  9. shalom on February 1, 2014, 7:43 am

    It’s easy to hit this proposal with a stick and talk about all the failure that has preceded it and the tragic economic/social/political realities for countless Palestinians surviving in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and in the Refugee Camps. But PEI can be utilized as a lever to lift the Palestinian economy and to make it increasingly independent as new international players join the ranks of investors in a growing Palestinian economy. Why not use $4billion to truly incentivise the Palestinian future?

    • Maximus Decimus Meridius on February 1, 2014, 11:19 am

      ” PEI can be utilized as a lever to lift the Palestinian economy and to make it increasingly independent”

      I don’t think you understand. The whole goal of PEI is to ensure that the Palestinian economy becomes increasingly DEpendent on Israel. The purpose is to provide a captive market for Israeli goods (which will be more and more neccessary if BDS really takes hold) while dampening down any and all aspirations towards genuine freedom. In the meantime, Gaza will be left as the world’s largest open-air prison, serving as a constant reminder to West Bank Palestinians of what awaits them should they ever consider getting uppity.

      • Citizen on February 2, 2014, 1:00 am

        I guess Israel will continue to be allowed to shoot at Gaza’s fishermen after Kerry makes the deal? Who gets the energy rights in the water off Gaza shores? Nothing about Gaza in Kerry’s mind? Don’t the Palestinian negotiation team care at all about their brothers and sisters in Gaza?

    • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 12:04 pm

      Because you owe them at least $50bn you cheapskate.

    • Citizen on February 2, 2014, 1:02 am

      @ Shalom
      Yeah, why not sell the Palestinian rights out for four billion, a paltry sum–Israel gets that free with interest from the US every year.

  10. just on February 1, 2014, 10:14 am

    Responding to seafoid–thanks for the link to that! The joyful music intertwined with the mournful rings so very true.

    I’ve listened to O’Carolan’s genius for a long time now– many play his music. His “Farewell to Music” evokes loss and pain– it’s the song of all those that are hurt, huddled, afraid and in pain.

    Here’s another rendition:

    • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 10:57 am

      si bheag si mhor

      Is about big fairies and small fairies having an argument , I think

      here is the translation of the gaelic version:

      “Oh, great strife came between the kings
      Feuds grew between their Hills
      Because Big Hill folk spoke too well of themselves
      While small hill burned beneath them
      “You can never share rights to our noble lake
      Go into ranks by tribe or town.
      Carry your blemish away from us
      Be happy to keep your hands and feet

      “You cannot always win every fight
      On lake, on land, when we contend
      It would be good if you made peace
      Instead of ordering wars in here
      Time to gather the hosts,
      make a striking force
      From throughout the plains
      they come marching here
      It will never seem right to die for hills
      Beheaded in that slaughter

      THis is why battle pains our hearts:
      With Hill princes on every side,
      And Tuatha De Dannan come in a swarm,
      The slaughter is not surprising
      Then it is that the Hill kings lost
      The thousand killed on every side
      There was no dwelling lnot destoyed
      In all the killing that day

      “Parley, parley, oh friends and kin!
      Our enemy from Cairn Clann Aoidh,
      Comes from Eachlainn Peak, up our dead troops”
      Now everyone fights together

      Now none ever will say twice,
      “War isn’t caused by too much pride”
      Peace is as good as wars were bad
      The towns in both lands are rebuilding
      Envy first, then an eager host,
      Then thousand prisoners in the grave…
      Better eat words almost forever
      Than have angry brothers on their biers”

      Iran and the USA – it never changes, does it?

      • just on February 1, 2014, 11:36 am

        No, it doesn’t.

        What is so astonishing to me is that Iran is ancient and pretty wise and the US is an upstart and more than a bit stupid.

        Israel appears to be the spark that keeps on taking, never giving– no accountability, linked to US in an ugly dance.

        (many thanks for the poem– it’s an epic)

    • seafoid on February 1, 2014, 8:04 pm

      Did you see that live? It looks fantastic.

  11. Stephen Shenfield on February 1, 2014, 10:52 am

    This is similar to the way the international financial institutions — which really means the governments that dominate those institutions — treat other weak and dependent countries. For instance, there are conferences where American, Canadian, and European officials plan “development” in Haiti — without a single Haitian present.

    • MHughes976 on February 1, 2014, 12:53 pm

      The Kerry Proposal will be screamingly unfair to the Palestinians in so many ways that even we will lose count. I wonder if it will even include an incentive for Palestinians to leave – raised immigration quotas and a fund that pays fares for people with qualifications. It will be rather more like economic servitude than economic peace, which I suppose was the situation in the post-bellum sharecropping deep South, with Seafoid’s Massah still very much the master. And there won’t be much that the likes of us can do to improve its terms, since everyone from Beijing to Honolulu and back again will fall over themselves to support it in fulsome terms, with peace prizes raining down. However, I’ve always thought that a 2ss period, begun on terrible and insulting terms and with a very unstable future, will inevitably be part of the story. It will give the Palestinians one thing, that is the ability to look the Zionists in the eye and say ‘We have a right to be here: even you have admitted it’. That is the negation of Zionism and may be the seed of better things for all concerned after many years in which both sides try every day to subvert the system they’ve set up amid much acclamation and congratulation from every corner of the world.

      • Citizen on February 2, 2014, 12:54 am

        And yes, one can dream. Perhaps Israel and its supporters around the world will have to start paying Nakba reparations. After all there’s a legal precedent since Germany and its old time Nazi allies have been paying them for scores of decades now. The US is a big-time enforcer of those reparations from the small states. Nearly all big infrastructure in the first couple of decades of Israel came from Germany, often engineered by Germans, you know, to help “the desert bloom”? German reparations even pay for those trips to Auschwitz and such Israel sends its young to, to keep them hot on the idea of joining the IDF. And how about the deep discount Israel gets from Germany on those Dolphin class submarines?

        BTW, anybody hear Kerry talking about who gets control over a Palestine state’s air space? LOL

      • seafoid on February 2, 2014, 5:30 am

        I read this in 2009 but I can’t find it online. Maybe it was here.
        Anyway it’s very interesting.

        “Zionists tend to get very scared when concrete plans are on the table (see, the Arab Initiative 2002-present). Most simply do not trust Arabs. When I ask them what their endgame is, they have none. I liken it to the dilemma of the slaveholder: “We know we need to free the slaves but if we do, what if they kill us?” This is tactically unsustainable and morally grotesque.
        That said, we have a right as Americans to propose the kind of country we wish Israel to be. If we end our billions of dollars of aid and cease giving them diplomatic cover in the UN, we lose many of our rights to dictate a solution – not our responsibility as humans to fight for justice, but some of our rights as Americans. (We as Jews must also work to not allow Israel to speak for the “world’s Jews” but that is a different issue.)”

        I bet they are really scared that Kerry’s crumbs are not accepted. They ran the show for so long.
        All that abuse at the airport is only credible if the Untermenschen have no access to other people who do not buy the memes.
        I think they know that now.

        I haven’t been to Ben Gurion since 04 but I were going now I’d just pepper them with questions. Where are you from, what schooling did you have, do you know anything about your grandparents’ culture, have you ever been to a neighbouring country, what did you think of Sharon, what do you think of Galut, how do you raise your kids, do you buy the memes, why , do you ever think about what it all means

  12. anthonybellchambers on February 2, 2014, 3:59 am

    Breaking News:

    Israel could lose 33% of exports as EU contemplates economic boycott

    After many years of offering financial inducements to its citizens to move into illegal settlements in the Occupied Territories of the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights – the Israeli government has been hit with the realisation that its continued violation of international law and its contempt for human and civil rights have finally alienated it from the member states of the European Union.

    It now faces the reality of a boycott of its bilateral trade with the EU and the loss of its main export market which represents one third of its overseas business which will drastically reduce its GDP and cause an economic downturn.

    There is now growing pressure, from within the 28, EU member states, for the current Israel Association Agreement to be revoked on the grounds of the continuing breach of its specific provisions on human and civil rights.

    Unless the Netanyahu government can now reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians, that includes the repatriation of all illegal settlers in the Occupied Territories, then trade with the EU could be lost. In such event, ‘Israel’s economy will retreat’ warned Yair Lapid, the coalition’s finance minister, and every Israeli worker would be hit ‘straight in the pocket’ with ten thousand ‘immediately’ losing their jobs.

    It is now a battle between ideology and economics and given the right-wing intransigence both in the Knesset and ‘on the street’, it seems likely that the ideologues will prevail; trade with Europe will virtually cease and the Israeli state will urgently need to find new markets for its machine guns, pharmaceuticals, information technology, soda-water and Sharon fruit.

    Dateline LONDON February 1, 2014

  13. homingpigeon on February 3, 2014, 1:34 pm

    To the extent the US has anything to do with attempting to solve this problem, the first step is an unconditional cutoff of all aid funds, bribes, baksheesh, deferred loans, weapons sales, etc to each and every entity, state, kingdom, authority, government, sultanate, and emirate in the region. A plague on all these regimes and our own.

    Vote Libertarian!

Leave a Reply