On ‘NYT’ stage, Roger Waters calls BDS ‘valid and legitimate picket line’

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

This is very good. Last week Roger Waters was invited to speak at the New York Times on the occasion of his new tour/album, and after an hour of musical discussion, a man in the audience asked Waters about his endorsement of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) aimed at Israel– what is your end goal?– and about the artists’ letter to Radiohead appealing to the band not to play Israel in July.

The question clearly makes interlocutor Jon Pareles squeamish. Though Waters gives an extended, calm answer (at 1:00:40), and got a lot of applause for it. I’ve transcribed it:

 

My end goal is the same as the end goal of anybody who’s involved with BDS, which is as you know is a nonviolent movement, it was started by Palestinian civil society. And I became aware of it in 2006 when I went to Israel to play and I in consequence was approached by BDS and had to start negotiating with them and talking with them and entering into a conversation about the predicament of the Palestinian people. And this is such a long conversation that we will curtail it here a little bit–

Essentially I was convinced that all of the people who live in that region should have rights. They should have property rights, they should have the right to their religion, and they should have rights to self-determination. All of them. So that’s all our Jewish friends who are in Israel, who live there, but also all our Palestinian and Arab friends who are living in the occupied territories and also in Israel. They should have equal rights. And that is my only beef. Just as all the people living in the United States of America should have equal rights, all of them, regardless of their color, creed, race or religion– that is what  I want for the Palestinians.

“Nothing more, nothing less. I’m not trying to destroy Israel. I have nothing against Jewish people. They accuse me of being an anti-semite, because it’s the only way they can attack this position– which is the basic position of BDS.

“BDS goes further, they want the right to return of the refugees, who were kicked out of their homes by force in 1947 and 48 and again in 1967 after the ’67 war.  I personally agree with that. I think that to be turfed out of where you have lived and where your family have lived for hundreds of years is wrong.”

Loud applause.

“So that’s it in a nutshell…

“I have engaged in a correspondence with some of Radiohead, and they seem to have decided that they’re going to go ahead and do a concert in Tel Aviv, so there’s very little more that I can say on the matter. They have to make up their own minds about what they decide to do with their lives and they have to go wherever their conscience lead them. So I’m not going to sit here and badmouth them or harangue them. My personal view is that there’s a valid and legitimate picket line that has been organized by BDS, and I would prefer it if colleagues in my business do not cross that picket line. But if people choose to, that is entirely a matter for them and their own consciences.”

More applause.

“One more (question). I hope it’s musical!” Pareles says.

Good for the Times for staging the Waters event, with the inevitable risk that he would come forth with such an eloquent statement, and folks would applaud him. Another sign of breakage. A lot of the comments at Youtube are pro-Israel, and scorbutic.

Now: Look at that letter Waters co-signed urging Radiohead to stay home. Look at the signatories. Geoff Dyer, Juliet Stevenson, James Schamus, Bella Freud, Mike Leigh, Eve Ensler, Julie Christie, Remi Kanazi, Desmond Tutu, Alice Walker and others. That is some collection of serious folks.

8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The loud applause Roger Waters received for his comments scares the Israeli apologist/propagandists. His words are obviously both true and ethical — two items the apologists completely lack. Hence the desperation to shut down free speech.

The Zionists wanted, from 1930 or earlier, to get a country in which they could live and also rule — call it a Jewish majority country — call it a Jewish country — and they could see no way to do accomplish this except by a large influx of Jews and a large outflow of non-Jews; thus the channeling of European and Russian Jews to Israel (the influx) and the Nakba (the outflow). and they… Read more »

The enthusiastic applause from the silent majority. It’s funny how equality can be seen as controversial, but only by those who are in positions of unchecked power and authority.

The Nazi leadership was tried under ex post facto law, establishing modern international law in the mid 20th Century and quickly expressed by Geneva IV; this law was earned by the blood spilled and mass destruction from the first two world wars, the second basically a continuation of the first. The American Indian wars ended in the late years of the 19th Century. The creation of Israel by force of Zionist terror, and its expansion… Read more »

“𝑰’𝒎 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒕𝒓𝒚𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒚 𝑰𝒔𝒓𝒂𝒆𝒍.”

Nor am I.

But I won’t stop an inch short of destroying apartheid and oppression.