News

Who can save Israel now? Labor leader emulates Netanyahu

Last summer liberal Zionists heralded the newest Labor leader in Israel, Avi Gabbay, as a dynamic Mizrahi who might revive the party. Ehud Barak called Gabbay’s selection a “revolution,” and the New York Times said the self-made millionaire represented “electrifying” “liberal forces” in opposition to conservative Likud.

Gabbay had brought a “new spirit” to the party, the Times’s Isabel Kershner said. While Gabbay declared, “[T]o all those who thought the Israeli citizens had lost hope in change, to all those — tonight is the answer.”

Well, in the last few days Gabbay has done his best to imitate Benjamin Netanyahu by saying he would never evacuate settlements and never form a governing coalition with Palestinians.

Gabbay’s comments are a good sign of just how far right the Jewish Israeli polity has gone today. The American press has largely ignored the news, typically, but liberal Zionists have condemned him. For instance, Daniel Seidemann tweeted,

Bad news: head of our “moderate opposition” is a racist, political invetebrate. Good news: he speaks English, so you’ll hear it yourselves.

Here’s the news. Six days ago Haaretz quoted Gabbay saying that he would never form a governing coalition with the Joint List, which is mostly Palestinian. But he would make a coalition with rightwing Jews.

“We will not share a government with the Joint List, period,” Gabbay said at a political forum in Be’er Sheva. “Let that be clear.”…

Gabbay didn’t reject the possibility of being part of a governing coalition alongside Kulanu, Yisrael Beiteinu and the ultra-Orthodox parties…

The leading Palestinian politician in Israel, Ayman Odeh, said Gabbay was no different from Netanyahu.

“Someone who doesn’t view Arab citizens and their elected representatives as a legitimate group, doesn’t present a real alternative to the right,” he said.

“Since the days of Ehud Barak, the Labor Party has strived to be a pale replica of the right – and the citizens always choose the original. To be drawn into the delegitimization campaign led by the prime minister against Arab citizens is a huge gift to the far-right coalition headed by Netanyahu and the settlers.”

Two days after that, Gabbay threw his support behind the settlers, saying that he wouldn’t evacuate illegal settlements as part of a peace deal. The Times of Israel reported, “New leader shifts main opposition party sharply to the right.”

“I won’t evacuate settlements in the framework of a peace deal,” said Gabbay… If you are making peace, why do you need to evacuate?”

Elaborating on his comments, Gabbay said the notion any peace deal would by necessity require the evacuation of settlements is mistaken.

“I think the dynamic and terminology that have become commonplace here, that ‘if you make peace — evacuate,’ is not in fact correct,” he said.

A lot of Labor Zionists were upset. Jewish Insider reported:

Left-wing figures blasted Gabbay for trying to appease the settlers. Tzipi Livni, Gabbay’s partner in the Zionist Union, sent out an SMS message stressing that Gabbay’s stance does not reflect her “Hatnua” party’s position, nor that of the Zionist Union, while Labor MK Itzik Shmuli tweeted that “separation into two states is an existential interest that will require painful concessions and evacuation of territory.”

Gabbay later walked it back, telling Ynet that the only settlements he wouldn’t evacuate were the big settlement blocs. Gabbay said the point was separation:

“I think we should aspire to reach an agreement with the Palestinians based on the principle of separating from the Palestinians, and based on the two states to two peoples principle.”

So that’s what it’s all about: the “principle” of separating Jews and Palestinians. I understand the resort to partition as a means of separating hostile groups. But ennobling that separation as a “principle”– that’s the essence of Zionism. Zionists want to have a Jewish majority by any means. And to hell with the Palestinians who are left in that state; they can’t be members of the governing coalition.

You have to ask, When have things been all that different in Israel? The settlement project began under Labor. And Labor has often formed coalitions with far-right Jewish parties while eschewing coalitions with Palestinians. Labor never wanted to have Palestinian partners in its governing coalitions because doing so would undermine that government’s legitimacy in the Jewish state.

Bottom line, no one should be all that surprised that Gabbay is a political invertebrate and a racist… These attitudes are the product of Jewish nationalism. It’s time liberal Zionists caught a clue.

Thanks to Scott Roth and Todd Pierce.

34 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Actually not surprising. Gabbay comes from Kulanu and he won the labor leadership because he was a new face and all the old faces have failed. He is not really Bibi light, more like Yair Lapid II. It was Lapid who said, that he would make no coalition with the Zoabis, and this is the majority position. Rabin had two votes in the Knesset, almost 25 years ago, one on the first oslo accords of 93, which won the Knesset vote by a relatively easy margin and the oslo II accords which won the Knesset by two votes 61-59.

I don’t hate Zoabi, but I’m not running for Knesset in Israel, where the changing rules have forced all the Arab parties to join as one, and i think they increased their share of the knesset as a result of that collaboration, but i think it is natural to say that Zoabi is not a natural partner to someone who doesn’t hate Israel.

The settlements statement shows his amateur status. If push comes to shove and this guy gets in, he might see his interest in reaching a peace, he’s not going to run on the platform, oh, i’m going to give them everything. that’s amateur reporting.

there is a racism problem in Israel. but this is just politics.
this tempest in a teacup does not impress me. if labor plus yair lapid can get a good amount of the votes, they could form a government, but i’m not betting on them. netanyahu stinks, and most israelis don’t think too much of him, but they are not willing to cast their lot with any “peacemaker” “concessions maker”. they don’t believe in peace or in concessions.

I would add that the major issue that is on deck to be solved next is not the west bank, but gaza, as in creating some port as has been discussed here:
https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/palestinians/.premium-1.815337

Unfortunately, this politician knows that to win votes, and the approval of the people, he must continue with Netanyahu’s policies and legacy….polls show the majority of Israelis want the occupation, and illegal settlements, to continue. The evil that is zionism. No politician that announces he/she wants to end the occupation, and give back illegal lands, will ever make it in zionist land. All at the expense of the true victims of this terrible conflict, the Palestinians.

Beyond words:

https://theintercept.com/2017/10/19/to-get-hurricane-rebuilding-money-in-texas-contractors-must-promise-they-wont-boycott-israel/

“To get hurricane rebuilding money in Texas, contractors must promise they won’t boycott Israel”

Zaid Jilani, The Intercept, Oct. 19/17

EXCERPT:

“IF YOU’RE A Texan looking to rebuild in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey, you’d better not boycott Israel.

“That’s the message being sent by the state, which has banned any contractor who supports the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions, or BDS, campaign from receiving state funds.

“If you’re confused why the two things are related, look to a bill that Texas’s Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law in July.

“House Bill 89 prohibits the state from entering into contract with a business unless it ‘does not boycott Israel; and will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract.’ The law applies even to businesses that would refuse to buy products made in illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land — as it defines Israel as both Israel proper and ‘Israeli-controlled territory.’”

One cannot help being enthusiastic about this “liberal”, a registered criminal against peace and war criminal:

Tzipi Livni, Gabbay’s partner in the Zionist Union, sent out an SMS message stressing that Gabbay’s stance does not reflect her “Hatnua” party’s position…

When Zionists, laboliberal and non, disagree about what should be talked about within “the framework of a peace deal” they are talking about ***talk*** only. Meaning what they will talk about during “negotiations” designed to delay any conclusion by another 10, 20, 40 years –as long as it takes to complete the ongoing genocide.

If the last 70 years haven’t already made that crystal-clear to all, the next 70 years will be no different.