Trending Topics:

To Europe we say: don’t conflate criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism

Middle East
on 18 Comments

In the context of its EU Presidency, the Austrian government will hold a high-level conference on November 21st, titled “Europe Beyond Anti-Semitism and Anti-Zionism – Securing Jewish Life in Europe.”

We fully embrace and support the EU’s uncompromising fight against anti-Semitism. The rise of anti-Semitism worries us. As we know from history, it has often signaled future disasters to all mankind. The rise of anti-Semitism constitutes a real threat and should be a major concern in contemporary European politics.

However, the EU also stands for human rights and has to protect them as forcefully as it fights anti-Semitism. This fight against anti-Semitism should not be instrumentalized to suppress legitimate criticism of Israel’s occupation and severe violations of Palestinian human rights.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was to address the conference in Austria, until he cancelled to stabilize his government. He has worked hard to conflate criticism of the state of Israel with anti-Semitism.

To our great concern, we see this conflation also in the official announcement of the conference by the Austrian government. It says: “Very often, anti-Semitism is expressed through exaggerated and disproportionate criticism of the state of Israel.”

These words echo the anti-Semitism definition of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). Several examples of contemporary anti-Semitism attached to this definition, relate to harsh critique of Israel. As a result, the definition can be dangerously instrumentalized to afford Israel immunity against criticism for grave and wide-spread violations of human rights and international law – criticism which is considered legitimate when directed at other countries. This has a chilling effect on any critique of Israel.

Moreover, the conference announcement identifies anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. However, Zionism, like all other modern Jewish movements in the 20th century, was harshly opposed by many Jews, as well as by non-Jews who were not anti-Semitic. Many victims of the Holocaust opposed Zionism. On the other hand, many anti-Semites supported Zionism. It is nonsensical and inappropriate to identify anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism.

We must also not forget that the state of Israel has been an occupying power for more than 50 years. Millions of Palestinians under occupation lack basic rights, freedom and dignity. As the Israeli occupation is now transforming into annexation, it is essential, more than ever, that Europe rejects efforts to restrict free speech and to silence criticism of Israel on the false ground of equating it with anti Semitism.

Europe also needs to do so for the credibility and effectiveness of its fight against anti-Semitism. Extending this fight to protect the state of Israel from criticism feeds misconceptions that Jews equal Israel – and are thus responsible for what Israel does.

As Israeli scholars, most of whom research and teach Jewish history, we say to Europe: Relentlessly fight anti-Semitism to protect Jewish life in Europe, and allow it to thrive. Do so while maintaining a clear distinction between criticism of the state of Israel, harsh as it may be, and anti-Semitism. Don’t mix anti Zionism with anti-Semitism. And preserve free speech for those who reject the Israeli occupation and insist that it ends.

Professor Gadi Algazi, Department of History, Tel Aviv University.

Dr. Yael Berda, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Professor Jose Brunner (emeritus), Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and

Ideas, and Buchmann Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University. Former director of the Minerva Institute for German History and founding academic supervisor of Israel’s first legal clinic for the rights of Holocaust survivors, Tel Aviv University.

Professor Alon Confino, Pen Tishkach Chair of Holocaust Studies, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Professor Arie M. Dubnov, Max Ticktin Chair of Israel Studies, Department of History, George Washington University.

Professor Rachel Elior, John and Golda Cohen Professor of Jewish Philosophy and Jewish Mystical Thought, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Professor David Enoch, Rodney Blackman Chair in the Philosophy of Law, Faculty of Law, Philosophy Department, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Dr. Yuval Eylon, Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, Department of History, Philosophy and Judaic Studies, Open University of Israel.

Professor Gideon Freudenthal (emeritus), Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University.

Dr. Amos Goldberg, former Chair Department of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Professor David Harel, Weizmann Institute of Science; Vice-President of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities; Israel Prize recipient (2004); EMET Prize recipient (2010).

Professor Hannan Hever, Department of Comparative Literature and the Judaic Studies Program, Yale University.

Professor Eva Illouz, Department of Sociology, Hebrew University Jerusalem; former president of Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, Jerusalem.

Daniel Karavan, sculptor, creator of the Memorial to Sinti and Roma Victims of National Socialism in Berlin (2012) and the Way of Human Rights at Germanisches Nationalmuseum in Nuremberg (1989-93); Israel Prize recipient (1977).

Professor Hannah Kasher (emerita), Department of Jewish Thought, Bar-Ilan University.

Professor Michael Keren (emeritus), Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Professor Yehoshua Kolodny (emeritus), Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Israel Prize recipient (2010).

Miki Kratsman, former Head of Photography Department at Bezalel Academy of Arts and Design; EMET Prize recipient (2011).

Nitzan Lebovic, Associate Professor, Apter Chair of Holocaust Studies and Ethical Values, Lehigh University.

Alex Levac, Israel Prize recipient (2005).

Dr. Anat Matar, Department of Philosophy, Tel Aviv University.

Professor Paul Mendes-Flohr (emeritus), Department of Jewish Thought, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Professor Jacob Metzer (emeritus), former president of the Open University Israel; Alexander Brody Professor of Economic History, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Michal Naaman, artist, Israel Prize recipient (2014).

Professor Yehuda Judd Ne’eman (emeritus), Faculty of Arts, Tel Aviv University; Israel Prize recipient (2009).

Professor Dalia Ofer (emerita), Max and Rita Haber Professor of Contemporary Jewry and

Holocaust Studies, Avraham Harman Institute of Contemporary Jewry, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Professor Ishay Rosen-Zvi, Head Talmud and Late Antiquity section, Department of Jewish Philosophy, Tel Aviv University.

Professor David Shulman (emeritus), Department of Asian Studies, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; EMET Prize recipient (2010); Israel Prize recipient (2016).

Dr. Dmitry Shumsky, Department of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry, former Director Bernard Cherrick Center for the Study of the Zionism, the Yishuv and the State of Israel, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Professor Zeev Sternhell (emeritus), Department of Political Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Israel Prize recipient (2008).

Professor David Tartakover, Israel Prize recipient (2002).

Professor Idith Zertal, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Institute for Jewish Studies University of Basel; author of ‘Israel’s Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood’.

Professor Moshe Zimmerman (emeritus), former Director Koebner Center for German History, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Professor Moshe Zuckermann (emeritus), Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University.

Open Letter
About Open Letter

Other posts by .


Posted In:

18 Responses

  1. DaBakr
    DaBakr
    November 27, 2018, 10:57 am

    “Don’t conflate..”. A flaccid cry…

    • bcg
      bcg
      November 27, 2018, 12:04 pm

      @DaBakr: Tell us if you find this less flaccid:

      “In December 2016, Jewish American commentator Peter Beinart – who, unlike Vilkomerson, identifies as a Zionist – came to a similar conclusion.

      ‘With every passing year, Israeli control of the West Bank grows more permanent. And so, with every passing year, more American progressives question Zionism…and the more those Americans voice this discomfort, the more establishment Jewish organizations work to classify anti-Zionism as anti-Semitism, punishable by Law.’ ”

      page 107, “Cracks in The Wall – Beyond Apartheid in Palestine/Israel” by Ben White.

    • eljay
      eljay
      November 27, 2018, 3:13 pm

      || DaBakr: “Don’t conflate..”. A flaccid cry… ||

      …but a moral one:

      … we say to Europe: Relentlessly fight anti-Semitism to protect Jewish life in Europe, and allow it to thrive. Do so while maintaining a clear distinction between criticism of the state of Israel, harsh as it may be, and anti-Semitism. Don’t mix anti Zionism with anti-Semitism. And preserve free speech for those who reject the Israeli occupation and insist that it ends.

      But, sure, it’ll never be as exciting as crying Conflate! followed by Anti-Semitism! and Jew hatred! is to a Zionist.

    • Misterioso
      Misterioso
      November 28, 2018, 10:45 am

      @DaBakr

      Pathetic comment. It’s long since time you stopped spewing forth pro Zionist/”Israel” bull**** for Hasbara Central and got a real job.

    • Misterioso
      Misterioso
      November 28, 2018, 10:48 am

      @DaBakr, et al

      https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israeli-professors-warn-against-equating-anti-zionism-with-anti-semitism-1.6674309

      EXCERPT:
      “Israeli Academics and Artists Warn Against Equating anti-Zionism With anti-Semitism”
      By Ofer Aderet, Haaretz, Nov. 20/18

      “Their open letter ahead of a conference in Vienna advises against giving Israel immunity for ‘grave and widespread violations of human rights and international law.’”

  2. amigo
    amigo
    November 27, 2018, 2:47 pm

    What zionists want is for the rest of the planet to give israel a pass because it is the so called “Jewish” state.

    Doesn.t that equate to treating israel differently from other states who commit crimes and would that surely be anti semitic.

    • DaBakr
      DaBakr
      November 28, 2018, 1:20 pm

      Don’t you treat israel differently from other states?

      • amigo
        amigo
        November 28, 2018, 3:47 pm

        “Don’t you treat israel differently from other states?” duhbaker

        What a silly question but allow me to indulge you.

        My answer is no but if you have evidence to the contrary , do please furnish.

        Question for the moderator ??.

        Why was this comment not posted .Is it in contravention of the comment rules .If so please explain how.

      • annie
        annie
        November 28, 2018, 4:44 pm

        heck yes, israel is the largest recipient of US “aid”. we privilege it to the toon of over 10 million a day.

      • RoHa
        RoHa
        November 29, 2018, 12:01 am

        If I treat Israel according to principles of justice and decency, I am doing the right thing.

        If, at the same time, I fail to treat other states according to those principles, then I am in error in regard to those states, but not in regard to Israel. Israel has no moral basis for complaint.

      • catalan
        catalan
        November 29, 2018, 9:03 am

        “If I treat Israel according to principles of justice and decency, I am doing the right thing. “ roha
        But what you think is justice and decency, others may consider abhorrent. These “principles” are just in your head. Like, some think Hamas is awesome and I get that, heros in the epic struggle etc. I think they are unabashed and cruel thugs. The principles are things in people heads, they are not real. Arguably, everyone thinks they are just and decent. I have never met a Zionist, a communist, a nationalist, anyone, who says I am indecent I am unjust.

      • RoHa
        RoHa
        November 29, 2018, 11:52 pm

        Even if your moral subjectivism is true, my point still holds.

        I treat Israel according to my principles. If I fail to treat other countries according to my principles, that is my error. Israel has no grounds to complain that I am not treating Israel according to my principles.

        It is really depressing to see how little effect philosophers have. Over much of the world, philosophers present arguments, and teach classes, to show that moral subjectivism and cultural relativism are, at best, debatable positions, and that Butler demolished psychological egoism in 1729. And yet people still pop up and offer these views as if they were undeniable, self-evident, truths.

      • DaBakr
        DaBakr
        December 2, 2018, 3:30 pm

        @annie

        It wouldn’t occur to you that collectively the US gives more money to the surrounding Arab Muslim nations then to Israel counter balancing your claim of Israel receiving ‘more’.

      • annie
        annie
        December 2, 2018, 4:11 pm

        lol, is that your idea of “counter balancing” dabakr? sorta like this:

        https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/light-weight-elephant-heavy-mouse-riding-728705179

      • oldgeezer
        oldgeezer
        December 2, 2018, 10:19 pm

        @duhbaker
        “collectively ”

        That’s the key word. You comparison is invalid in the formulation.

        Yes Israel Israel is the largest recipient. Collectively, by definition, means you are referring to multiple recipients.

        You see this as a Jew/Muslim, Judaism/Islam issue apparently if you think your comparison has any merit whatsoever.

        It doesn’t.

        btw… Yes Israel is treated differently than other states. It commits crimes and crimes against humanity on a daily basis which are not only ignored. Not merely ignored. They are provided a political smokescreen by western nations.

        Israel is a rogue state. It refuses to recognize, let alone adhere to, International Law or International Humanitarian law.

        Any other outside of the big 5-8 would have bombed back to the stoneage by now.

        I prefer BDS until such time as a fully independant, coherent/rational state of Palestine exists.

  3. amigo
    amigo
    November 27, 2018, 3:00 pm

    It would be nice if those responsible for this report would refrain from casting their accusations at all european nations.
    Whats the difference between that and accusing all Jews of being responsible for Israel.s crimes.

    Both claims are racist and bigotted.

  4. Spring Renouncer
    Spring Renouncer
    November 29, 2018, 2:18 pm

    I think Philip is right that the vicious phony allegations against Jeremy Corbin are a prelude to what will happen in the US soon, as criticizing Israel becomes more mainstream on the American left. It’s already beginning: just today Bari Weiss (a living manifestation of the canary mission during her college years and now a strident propagandist for Israel) wrote a pathetic smear piece against Jeremy Corbin. Like the others she consciously conflates antizionism with antisemitism. This is a cynical tragedy, as it robs antisemitism, which does still exist and should be combated, of any meaning, while condemning Palestinians simply for being. Shame.

  5. Atlantaiconoclast
    Atlantaiconoclast
    December 2, 2018, 9:31 pm

    Why aren’t Zionists as concerned with accusations of anti Gentilism as non Zionists are of accusations of anti Semitism? Cause the former know that the latter are too cowardly to use that term. But what else is the current application of Zionism but vicious anti Gentilism?

Leave a Reply