Trending Topics:

The climate emergency makes Zionism obsolete (but Judaism could help save the planet)

Opinion
on 14 Comments

The climate emergency makes Zionism redundant as a future response to antisemitism; it’s already responsible for gross inequality in resilience against climate change; and, in the context of the global crisis we face, Zionism is one of many obsolete ideologies which needs to be ditched if we’re to build a sustainable future for all of us.

In contrast, Judaism itself, shorn of its Zionist overlay, has plenty to offer as we look for radically different ways to relate to each other and the planet.

It’s getting hotter

Climate change didn’t feature much in last week’s election in Israel. Perhaps that’s not surprising. According to a recent study by the Pew Research Centre, Israelis seem notably less concerned about climate than other nations.

But climate change ought to have been front and center of every party’s campaign.

On Wednesday 17 July this year, Israel recorded a temperature of 49.9 degrees celsius [122 F] on the southern shores of the Dead Sea. The heat in Tel Aviv was 40 degrees and 38 in Jerusalem [104 and 100 F]. The same day, as a consequence of the heatwave, bush fires broke out across the country (and around some West Bank Settlements) spreading at nine miles an hour in places.

In May more than 1,000 fires ravaged Israel over a three-day heatwave with thousands of people forced to leave their homes.

This year’s heatwaves have followed similar extreme weather events in recent years, but as each year passes the fires become fiercer.

The evidence suggests that the heatwaves and fires are no longer exceptional. The Middle East is expected to be hit hard by climate change with longer droughts, hotter heat waves, severe water shortages and grasslands turning permanently to desert.

In the second half of the century, if business as usual continues, Israeli researchers are predicting average temperature rise of up to 2.5 degrees celsius [3.5 F], and a drop in precipitation of up to 40 percent in non-arid parts of the country.

Any temperature rises above 1.5 degrees globally is expected to have catastrophic consequences. And even if the United Nation’s targets are achieved, we are still looking at significant change to our world.

No country is doing enough to mitigate the climate emergency. As things stand, governments around the world are failing to recognize the depth and breadth of the changes that will be required to avoid the calamity we’ve been warned about for decades. There’s plenty of global bad thinking that’s stopping our ability to address the emergency and plenty of distractions getting in the way of determined action. In the UK it’s called Brexit.

For Israel though, there is a particular context which makes things additionally difficult: Zionism.

The irrelevance of Zionism

If we look at Zionism from the point of view of its intended beneficiaries – Jews around the world under threat from antisemitism – it’s clearly no longer fit for purpose in the time we must now call the Anthropocene.

How can Israel present itself as a Jewish safe haven from a hostile world when its water security is at high risk, crop yields will soon be falling and fires will be raging all year round? In a region already fraught with conflict, climate analysts expect temperature rise to have a multiplier effect that exacerbates and accelerates wars and mass migrations. Promoting Zionism starts to look like an invitation to Jews to jump from the metaphorical frying pan into the literal fire.

When it comes to climate change, national borders will offer no protection from antisemitism. Climate has no interest in faith or ethnicity or in historical or religious claims to a particular piece of land. Climate change is staunchly apolitical, ahistorical and agnostic.

Of course, climate change won’t make antisemitism go away. But like much else that’s wrong and unfair about the world, the climate emergency compels us to looks at things differently, consider the root causes, and understand the interconnectedness of injustice. As well as terrible threats, climate change forces upon us the possibility of a profound ethical revolution.

In the meantime, human-created injustice goes on, which brings us to the victims of Zionism – the Palestinian people.

The most vulnerable

Climate change hits the most vulnerable in every part of the world. That’s certainly the case in Israel/Palestine where inequality is constitutionally, institutionally and culturally built-in.

The 52-year occupation of the West Bank and Gaza has created a climate change apartheid overseen by Israeli governments from left to right. However, the origins of today’s unequal access to natural resources and the political and economic infrastructure to respond and adapt to the coming crisis, must be tracked back much further in the story of Zionism. And that long history of settler colonialism includes the introduction of European pine trees planted across the country by the Jewish National Fund which turned out to be ethnic cleansing disguised as environmentalism. The pines have turned out to be a poor choice when it comes to managing forest fires.

Al-Shabaka, the Palestinian Policy Network, has detailed how the on-going occupation has profoundly weakened the Palestinians’ ability, in both Gaza and the West Bank, to adapt or implement resilience strategies for what’s soon to come. For anyone who’s traveled through the West Bank, the contrast between the lush, well-irrigated fields of the Settlements and the dwindling and thirsty Palestinian farmland nearby is both glaring and outrageous.

But there could be far worse discrimination to come if the climate emergency encourages not an ethical revolution but a retreat into extreme nationalist and nativist thinking. And there’s plenty of that already within Zionism.

Zionism, with its belief in the necessity of valuing the needs of one group of people over another in the name of ethnoreligious exceptionalism, has the potential to become part of the eco-fascism that many are already observing in different parts of the world. Naomi Klein in her new book “On Fire – The burning case for a new green deal” describes the phenomenon:

Let there be no mistake: This is the dawn of climate barbarism. And unless there is a radical change not only in politics but in the underlying values that govern our politics, this is how the wealthy world is going to “adapt” to more climate disruption: by fully unleashing the toxic ideologies that rank the relative value of human lives in order to justify the monstrous discarding of huge swaths of humanity.

Judaism (not Zionism) can help save the planet

A people and planet focused approach to the climate emergency ought to make Zionism a candidate for the landfill rather than recycling. Judaism on the other hand has a great deal to offer in terms of wisdom for understanding how to create a new global agenda.

Last Friday (20 September) as millions protested around the world as part of the Global Climate Strike, I joined a modest but passionate gathering on the high street of my home village in North Yorkshire and later an ecumenical prayer vigil. At the vigil I suggested we read aloud the Book of Lamentations.

Lamentations is a collection of five biblical poems, bleak laments for Jerusalem, a city laid waste and abandoned by God because of its own wrongdoing. It describes destruction, murder, famine and even cannibalism, as society and morality crumbles. The poet (thought to be the prophet Jeremiah) describes a time when it’s better to be dead than alive. It’s a part of the Hebrew Bible where God’s voice is silent.

Traditionally, Lamentations is read at the Jewish festival of Tisha B’Av, an annual day of Jewish mourning for the destruction of the First and Second Temples and also much else that has befallen us as a people.

When thinking about the destruction that climate has already brought to many people and what is likely on the way for many more of us, the text starts to speak with a contemporary voice.

Lamentations chapter 5:14-18:

“The elders are gone from the city gate; the young men have stopped their music. Joy is gone from our hearts; our dancing has turned to mourning. The crown has fallen from our head. Woe to us, for we have sinned! Because of this our hearts are faint, because of these things our eyes grow dim for Mount Zion, which lies desolate, with jackals prowling over it.”

The Hebrew prophet Zechariah believed the cause of the destruction was God’s anger at the lack of justice in that society. He offers this advice for how to prevent a repeat performance, from Zechariah chapter 7: 5-6:

“Execute true justice and behave to one another with loyalty and compassion. Do not oppress the widow, the orphan, the stranger and the poor, and do not plot evil against one another.”

A Judaism, shorn of the ethical corruption that Zionism has led it to, has plenty to offer us in a campaign to radically re-orient our value system.

I used to read Jewish scripture and liturgy as largely poetic and allegorical. Now it looks like a literal reading makes far more sense.

Here’s a passage from the Shema, the most familiar of Jewish prayers. Isn’t this a very clear instruction that needs no accommodation to our contemporary situation? Deuteronomy chapter 11: 13-17:

“And it shall come to pass if you surely listen to the commandments that I command you today to love the Lord your God and to serve him with all your heart and all your soul, That I will give rain to your land, the early and the late rains, that you may gather in your grain, your wine and your oil. And I will give grass in your fields for your cattle and you will eat and you will be satisfied. Beware, lest your heart be deceived and you turn and serve other gods and worship them. And anger of the Lord will blaze against you, and he will close the heavens and there will not be rain, and the earth will not give you its fullness, and you will perish quickly from the good land that the Lord gives you.”

Whether you have a belief in this God or not, the gods we currently worship have undoubtedly wrecked the planet, possibly beyond the point of redemption, and the “blaze” is already upon us. Or as Greta Thunberg puts it: “Our house is on fire.”

Climate change makes Zionism (along with much other narrow and divisive thinking) not only obsolete but counterproductive to the task before us.

To deal with the climate emergency requires a global level of co-operation we have yet to see in human history. It requires us to act in the interests of people we don’t know, who live in places we have never been to. It requires us to measure individual, corporate and national achievements in an entirely new way that places sustainability and wellbeing at the center of all our endeavors. It also requires humanity to become a great deal more humble that it is today. With my Jewish sensibility, this sounds remarkably like the just society presented to us in the scroll of the Torah.

This article originally appeared on Robert Cohen’s blog on September 21, 2019. 

Robert Cohen

Cohen is a British writer. He blogs at Micah's Paradigm Shift. http://micahsparadigmshift.blogspot.co.uk/

Other posts by .


Posted In:

14 Responses

  1. JLewisDickerson on September 24, 2019, 11:27 am

    RE: “In May more than 1,000 fires ravaged Israel over a three-day heatwave with thousands of people forced to leave their homes.” ~ Robert Cohen

    MY COMMENT: A veritable “lake of fire”!

    Lake of fire – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_of_fire

  2. Ossinev on September 24, 2019, 1:49 pm

    Tut Tut Robert . Don`t you realise that it is Anti – Semitic to accuse Israel of not doing enough to combat Climate Change. I know it`s not in the IHRA definition but I think it will pop up in there in due course.

    • Mooser on September 24, 2019, 6:03 pm

      ” I know it`s not in the IHRA definition…”

      It could fit in very easily. I would think saying that any aspect of Jewish history or religion doesn’t either lead up to Zionism or endorse Zionism directly could be construed as anti-semitic.

    • mondonut on September 24, 2019, 6:19 pm

      @Ossinev, I know it`s not in the IHRA definition …

      Sure it is:

      Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

      • eljay on September 24, 2019, 7:37 pm

        || mon donut: … Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. ||

        Thank you for confirming that it is not anti-Semitic to expect of Israel behaviour that I expect of all countries (and not just the democratic ones):
        – no aggression, oppression, military occupation, colonialism, torture, murder, sundry (war) crimes or supremacism;
        – respect for international laws and human rights (incl. RoR); and
        – responsibility and accountability for past and on-going (war) crimes committed.

        Thank you also for confirming that the double-standard vigorously applied to Israel by Zionists is, in fact, anti-Semitic.

  3. Keith on September 24, 2019, 5:43 pm

    ROBERT COHEN- “The climate emergency makes Zionism redundant as a future response to antisemitism….”

    Zionism is not a response to anti-Semitism. Zionism is a response to the threat of assimilation and a reaffirmation of Jewish kinship identity.

    • Misterioso on September 25, 2019, 10:32 am

      @Keith

      Huh?

      As history attests, Henry Morgenthau Sr., former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, correctly defined Zionism in 1919: “Zionism is the most stupendous fallacy in Jewish history…. The very fervour of my feeling for the oppressed of every race and every land, especially for the Jews, those of my own blood and faith, to whom I am bound by every tender tie, impels me to fight with all the greater force against this scheme, which my intelligence tells me can only lead them deeper into the mire of the past, while it professes to be leading them to the heights. Zionism is… a retrogression into the blackest error, and not progress toward the light.” (Quoted by Frank Epp, Whose Land is Palestine? p. 261)

      • Keith on September 25, 2019, 2:49 pm

        MISTERIOSO- “Huh?”

        What do you mean “huh?” My comment is in complete agreement with what Henry Morgenthau Sr said concerning the nature of Zionism. Zionism is a rejection of true assimilation/multiculturalism in favor of a secular version of Classical (medieval) Judaism. A “… retrogression into the blackest error, and not progress toward the light.” My one quibble with Morgenthau is whether or not this is some sort of error. Jewish Zionism is a key factor in relative Jewish Zionist success and power.

  4. pabelmont on September 24, 2019, 6:01 pm

    Zionism did not itself cause GWCC, but it is doing nothing to stop it, especially in I/P, where the Palestinians — particularly in Gaza, soon to be unlivable — are hardest hit.

    An article soon to be online, “Uninhabitable: Gaza Faces a Moment of Truth” by Jonathan Cook (The Link, Aug-Sept 2019, AMEU.org) declares that Israel’s plan is to force Egypt to accept the Gazans into Sinai when Gaza soon becomes uninhabitable, a revival of the ethnic cleansing of 1948-51. The nations of the world which have done NIL to oppose Israel are expected to continue to do NIL, and removal of Palestinians from the West Bank might follow.

    Jews should (of course) demand that Israel allow the Gazans to escape their prison into Israel from which most came originally (or their parents, etc.), If there is water and food enough in Sinai — is there ? — it could be purchased by Israel and shipped into Israel rather than the population of Gaza deported. And if there is not enough food and water — and housing — in Sinai, what then?

  5. Ossinev on September 25, 2019, 9:16 am

    @mondonut
    “Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation”

    Not sure that you can tag this get out of jail free crap in here. Do other “nations” uproot thousands of native olive trees in occupied lands?

    And as for all those fire receptive and fire inducing foreign pine trees planted to conceal the ethnically cleansed native villages !

    • Misterioso on September 25, 2019, 10:43 am

      @Ossinev

      Correct!!

      Over the years Israel’s Jewish National Fund (JNF) planted about 260 million pine trees (not indigenous to historic Palestine) on confiscated Palestinian land. At the same time, the JNF uprooted millions of indigenous Palestinian olive trees. The JNF’s chief purpose was to hide the ruins of the ethnically cleansed Palestinian villages and their history.

      Predictably, the pine trees were unable to adapt to Palestine’s dry climate. According to JNF statistics, 60% of the pine saplings did not survive. The pine trees that did survive soon constituted firetraps that cause deadly, massive forest fires by the end of each summer.
      Rather than admit their stupidity, Israel’s leaders, choose to blame the inevitable catastrophe on native Palestinians.

      • RoHa on September 25, 2019, 11:14 pm

        “choose to blame the inevitable catastrophe on native Palestinians.”

        That’s what Palestinians are for.

  6. CigarGod on September 28, 2019, 10:43 am

    Whatever happened to Annie?
    She used to be a lively presence on posts like this.

Leave a Reply