The New York Times continues to either downplay, ignore, or whitewash Israel’s key role in the Iran crisis.
Here’s the latest example of bias — a long analysis by Max Fisher, “The Interpreter,” headlined (in the print edition yesterday) “Trump’s Iran Strategy Confounds Friends and Foes Alike.” Fisher consults a number of experts but ends up as puzzled as when he started, contending that Trump’s “action fit no clear pattern or long-term strategy.” He cites one expert saying, “There’s not a single person that I’ve spoken to who can tell you what Trump is up to with Iran.” How about Aaron David Miller of Carnegie Endowment, who says Israelis were “somehow involved in this.”
Fisher’s detailed article only mentions Israel once, in passing.
Let’s try some Interpreting of our own: Donald Trump’s strategy is clear. 1) Use war fever to promote Trump’s own reelection. 2) Curry favor with the pro-Israel billionaires who are his 2 biggest donors: gambling tycoon Sheldon Adelson and the founder of Home Depot, Bernard Marcus. 3) Help Trump ally Benjamin Netanyahu win the next election in Israel.
Meanwhile, it is disappointing to see retired General David Petraeus appear all over the media, weaseling by refusing to criticize Trump’s assassination of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani. Petraeus has repeatedly been quoted by the New York Times, for instance, saying of Iranian generals: “These guys are the personification of evil.” Petraeus is an intelligent man who surely knows better. Some years ago, retired colonel Andrew J. Bacevich offered insight into Petraeus in his excellent America’s War for the Greater Middle East. Bacevich, who lost his son Andrew, a young lieutenant, in 2007 during the war in Iraq, is a superbly informed and persuasive critic of U.S. policy in the Mideast.
Bacevich recognizes Petraeus’s “genuinely prodigious talents.” But he also cautions that the celebrated ex-general’s career shows that he is a master at making the right connections above him in the chain of command and at manipulating the press. Is Petraeus waffling because he hopes to make some kind of comeback? He was ignominiously forced to resign as CIA director in 2012 after admitting to an extramarital affair.
Is that why Petraeus is all over television and the Times, tacitly endorsing Trump’s dangerous escalation with Iran? Meanwhile, Bacevich, now the president of the Quincy Institute, says the U.S. has sown anarchy in the region since 9/11:
[T]he U.S.’ Middle East wars will continue due to the intellectual bankruptcy of the foreign policy establishment, which remains wedded to a highly militarized conception of “American global leadership.”
Why isn’t Colonel Andrew Bacevich on our screens instead?