here's the logic behind the long list of tropes.
1. once upon a time a jewish person was falsely accused of something.
2. therefore forever and always accusing a jewish person of that something is antisemitic.
imagine if we applied that logic to other groups. it would be bigoted to accuse anyone of anything because of any of their 'group' being falsely accused in the past. over time, every group has had members falsely accused and every group has included criminals and dishonest people.
over the weekend a british tabloid had a headline w/'enemy from within' regarding labour's blarite backstabbers. some jewish some not. even tho that terms has been around since the beginning of time and enemies from within have been around since the beginning of time, it was a term (i just found out) that hitler used against jews. therefore is was (highly) anti semitic to make that claim (twitter erupted) even tho there are currently active members of the labour party trying to take corbyn down. but because some of them are jewish (like members of JLM) it becomes a historical trope. you can even have 3 jewish papers with headlines glaring they are going to take corbyn down but call them enemies from within is off limits. the very concept of implying they are trying to control aspects of the party, even when the president of the board of british jews makes "demands"(according to the press) you can't publicly allude they are trying to control anyone, because that becomes a trope.
it begs the question of what, over time historically, jews have never done or been accused of doing in the past that therefore doesn't qualify as a trope.
norms point is that if something is true, it's not anti semitic. take bernie madoff. you can call him a greedy corrupt cheat because he was. but is calling him a jewish greedy corrupt cheap anti semitic? probably. mentioning the jewishness of a person is ok when discussing advancements or benevolent accomplishments. but anything negative, like war crimes, crashing financial repercussions, lobbying efforts, accusing dame hodges weaponizing the holocaust to deflect from a disciplinary report -- is bad. the pc patrol will be on your tail.
at some point the far left western ideology that the Palestinians are representative of an endangered minority will dissipate and there will be a peace of sorts.
ah yes, reminds me of The Young and Palestinians: https://mondoweiss.net/2013/06/the-young-palestinian/
The old will be brutalized. They will bleed, they will scream, they will claw their fingernails into the bones of the land that we will steal from underneath their hands, and we will then break their arms. They will be displaced, forcefully removed from their land, thrown into camps as if they are lifeless animals. They will die, and the young will forget.
It is the perfect crime. “The old will die and the young will forget,” said the first Israeli Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion. The world may never know the truth because the memories will not last long enough to be attested and spread. Therefore, the oppressor will prevail, reaping off our continuous Nakba forever, slurping it up as if our demise is its nourishment.
tell me dabkr, in your assessment will the notion Jews are an endangered minority also be fading into the past anytime soon or will you be clutching onto the status ad infinitum?