By James North
Studs Terkel was the smartest person
I ever met, and the greatest single influence on me as a writer. He
was much more than his folksy, cigar-chomping red-checked-shirt
persona, authentic as that was.
The last time I saw him was one
evening maybe 10 years ago just off Michigan Avenue, in downtown
Chicago. He was in a long conversation with a homeless person who he
obviously knew, long after most of us passed by the homeless with
barely a thought.
I told him I was just back from Mexico, and I gave him the latest on Mexican politics. He was entirely conversant with affairs outside of Chicago. "The Mexican ruling party sounds just like that fucking right-wing Berlusconi, in Italy," he added.
I was part of a group celebrating with him in 1984, when he won the Pulitzer prize for The Good War.' He was characteristically modest. "It's not 'great' news," he insisted. "But it is 'good' news."
With Division Street America
in the late 1960s, Studs basically founded the field of oral history --
telling large truths through individual people, mainly in their own
words. So many books have used his approach that we sometimes forget
he started it. (I basically just copied his methods and applied them
to southern Africa in Freedom Rising -- as I said to him when he had me on his radio program.)
Being
interviewed once by Studs was one of the great experiences of my life.
He was so good at it that compared with the rest of us he was like
White Sox (and Orioles) shortstop Luis Aparicio next
to little leaguers. First, he actually had done his homework; he had
my book next to him, marked up throughout with his green felt pen. He
had a performer's sense of timing. He had worked as an actor, and he
used his experience to play a role: the likeable old guy, befuddled by
his big, ancient tape recorder, who really needed your help. Before
ten minutes had passed, you found yourself telling the old gent about
things you didn't even realize yourself.
I have one more
strong memory of him: his sensitivity. I reviewed one of his later
books in a small but valuable publication called In These Times,
and, almost as an afterthought, I mailed him a copy of the review. He
contacted me immediately, with profuse thanks. A negative notice had
just appeared in another publication, and he said my review had been
just what he needed.
We met for lunch, and I asked him a little
delicately if he was sensitive to criticism, after all the honors he
had received. He was close to 80 years old at the time. "Of course
I'm sensitive," he said. "That other review hurt my feelings, and my
morale was low."
-
-
- Husband of ‘NYT’ Jerusalem correspondent calls for attack on Iran 13
- Israeli military court extends administrative detention for civil rights lawyer … 1
- AIPAC member identified as Abileah assailant during Netanyahu speech to … 14
- Adelson dumps Gingrich and Santorum’s star is rising 18
- US citizens arrested in Bahrain supporting peaceful protest near one-year … 9
- ‘Free Beacon’ reporter attacks Center for American Progress in misleading … 11
- The 8th annual ‘Israeli Apartheid week’ is focused on BDS 5
- Likud party members issue call to storm al-Aqsa mosque next … 15
-
- Khader Adnan, political prisoner held without charges, is near death … 131
- The Iraq war coverup: What did AIPAC do and when … 84
- How Sarah Schulman managed to get ‘Pinkwashing’ into the New … 62
- Palestinian cars sprayed with unknown materials at Israeli checkpoints 62
- Likud party members issue call to storm al-Aqsa mosque next … 56
- US citizens arrested in Bahrain supporting peaceful protest near one-year … 52
- Archbishop Desmond Tutu endorses PennBDS conference 51
- MSNBC: Israel trains Iranian terror group to kill nuclear scientists 47
-
- Both sides are wrong in the ‘Israel Firsters’ debate 287
- Would you buy a used metaphor from this warmonger? (Niall … 125
- Jewish substitution and the white gaze 124
- ‘Commentary’ covers its eyes and makes Palestinians disappear 115
- So the U.S. military doesn’t want to attack Iran and … 114
- Leading Zionist historian was first to say ‘Israel Firster’– in … 103
- A lull on this site 74
- Organizers say pro-Israel filmmaker with controversial past deceives, disrupts Penn … 74
-
Recent Comments
click link to see last 100 comments- Husband of ‘NYT’ Jerusalem correspondent calls for attack on Iran (13)
- Taxi: Iran considers an israeli attack on it to be a usa/israel/saudi arabian attack. In an initial retaliatory...
- Where is the Bedouin Intifada? (54)
- tree: Hi Shmuel. I was trying to address that “white man’s burden” thinking implicit in...
- tree: Yes, Dunkelman had promised the surrendering town officials that he would not expel them but was ordered to do...
- tree: One more point: It’s very likely Israel invested next to nothing in the education of its Arab citizens before...
- ‘Free Beacon’ reporter attacks Center for American Progress in misleading articles that push for Iran war (11)
- Shingo: But concerning the press, there were spinned leaks before the report came out and this has an effect of...
- Tuyzentfloot: I have the impression Kelley was a bit easy on the report, considering the other valid criticisms about...
- A lull on this site (74)
- Likud party members issue call to storm al-Aqsa mosque next Sunday (15)
- Winnica: Feiglin says the whole thing is a hoax, and has called for the police to investigate and uncover the...
- Sh*t the David Project says about Israel (4)
- Hostage: a more apropos video would be called, “Sh*t Zionist say to Palestinians.” However, no one has made that...
- Husband of ‘NYT’ Jerusalem correspondent calls for attack on Iran (13)
Our Writers
- Philip Weiss

- Adam Horowitz

- Today in Palestine

- Annie Robbins

- Alex Kane

- Kate

- Alice Rothchild

- Ahmed Moor

Blogroll

James,
I didn't know you wrote for In These Times.
Studs Terkel was a hero of mine as well.
PBS had Studs on countless times–why hasn't PBS had Ralph Nader on? He's running on the ballot in many states… Where's Charlie Rose? In our public school mock balloting, why aren't the third party candidates on the ballot?
What's public about public except taxpayer funds?
The "Good War" was a great book. So was Division Street. I lived in Chicago for 20 years and he and MIke Royko were both great.
Nader has shot his wad, that's why they don't have him on. I'd rather have two parties that encompass most people then multiple parties that bring the system to a halt like in Israel. Then again there is the Hamas method. Throw the other guy off the roof. Which come to think of it is the Arab way.
What were his positions on Israel … settlements … Palestine … Zionism and on immigration to the US?
I lived in Chicago for forty years.
I also liked Studs and Royko. I went to where Royko hung out.
It's not for PBS to ignore a person like Nader, with all he has added to the American good and discourse because he "shot his wad." He's running for POTUS.
PBS record shows constant showing of fringe ideas, as well they should. So, SOG, please how about a little brains from your end?
Too much to ask?
PS: How about the Israeli way? You know, just assassinate those you don't like, toss the rest in jail, torture them, pretend they don't exist by the thousands? Leave cluster bombs in the field for their children to play with–all paid for by USA dollars…
HAMAS was democratically elected just as much as any Israeli
parliament with its no-go for any Arab member swing vote.
Look, I would hardly call PBS a conservative outlet. Nader has been runing for president for what seems like forever. At what point do you say enough already. Studs Terkel on the other hand was a prominent American literary figure.
I didn't realize Terkel was Jewish until I saw Richard's comment.
PBS is liberal just like Joe Lieberman is liberal–on everything except
any voice against Israel policy.
SOG, and Nader didn't contribute an equal amount for the USA as compared to Studs as a "literary" figure? Not to mention he's running for POTUS?
SOG is a perfect candidate for Nader's lemon law.
You think that anything besides Hezbollah and Stormfront is an Israeli mouthpiece
"Where's Charlie Rose?"
He's probably out to dinner with one of the men he then pretends to hold an unbiased "interview" with.