New principle of ‘asymmetrical warfare’ justifies attacks on civilians

The theory, explained by Jeff Halper:

The Israeli attack on Gaza in December 2008/January 2009 was not merely a military assault on a primarily civilian population, impoverished and the victim of occupation and besiegement these past 42 years.  It was also part of an ongoing assault on international humanitarian law by a highly coordinated team of Israeli lawyers, military officers, PR people, and politicians, led by (no less) a philosopher of ethics.  It is an effort coordinated as well with other governments whose political and military leaders are looking for ways to pursue "asymmetrical warfare" against peoples resisting domination and the plundering of their resources and labor without the encumbrances of human rights and current international law.  It is a campaign that is making progress and had better be taken seriously by us all.

The practice. Statement three days ago from US Deputy Ambassador to the UN Alejandro Wolff on the Goldstone Report:

"We have previously noted shortcomings that include [the report’s] unbalanced focus on Israel, the negative inferences it draws about Israel’s intentions and actions, its failure to deal adequately with the asymmetrical nature of the Gaza conflict, and its failure to assign appropriate responsibility to Hamas for deliberately targeting civilians, and basing itself and its operations is heavily civilian-populated urban areas."

21 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments