News

The 99 percent in DC

99 DC
(Photo: John Quiqley)

To learn about activities happening near you visit Occupy Together. To learn more about “the 99 percent” and the inspiration behind the protests be sure to visit the We Are the 99 Percent tumblr page.

8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

There are four reasons to stop the 1%:

First, some of them got rich by commiting crimes.

Second, most of them didn’t get rich by simply working harder than the 99% in a fair system. Instead, they actively engaged in rigging the system in their favor. Many of them don’t succeed by offering superior products in an open market, but by being close to politicians who award them defense contracts etc. or who abolish necessary regulations especially in the financial sector.

Watch Inside Job if you want to learn more about these first two points:
http://www.sonyclassics.com/insidejob/

Third, even if the 1% would have got rich simply by working harder than the rest, they have accumulated too much of the wealth for the economy to properly function.

Read this article by Joseph Stiglitz if you want to learn more about why the whole economy suffers in the long term if wealth is too concentrated:
http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105

Fourth, wealth means power, and if power is too concentrated and held by a minority, democracy ceases to function properly.

In short, there are many good reasons to stop the 1% and build up a new, truly market-based economy where the financial sector does not overshadow the production of real goods.

I looked all over both links-and some links to those links=and I couldn’t find who was behind these demonstrations. I wish I knew-whoever it is, I’d like to shake her hand-to get all these people to go out and march and not know what they’re marching for.

Adam
David Brooke”s has an undermining piece up about the 99% Occupy Wall Street protest. Clearly has not gone down to talk to any of the protesters as MSNBC’s Ed continues to do. Oh how I wish the hundreds of thousands of us (millions nationwide, 30 million world wide) who were protesting, petitioning, lobbying, being arrested before the invasion would have received this kind of MSM coverage. We did not. Maybe just maybe some lives could have been saved if those at home could have seen who was really out on the streets before the invasion. Oh I know that is so yesterday. I know Obama and all our Reps keep saying “move on, next chapter, do not be about retribution, witch hunts, vengeance” Still keep wondering why holding the Bush administration warmongers and liars accountable for the unncecessary deaths in Iraq and the deaths and injuries of American soldiers is “vengeance” and not JUSTICE.

Brooke’s fails to acknowledge that the common threads running through all of the issues (economic disparity, access to jobs, living wages, health care, unnecessary and costly wars both in blood and treasure) that the Occupy Wall Street protestors across the country are focused on are JUSTICE and ACCOUNTABILITY.

Brooke’s inability or unwillingness to go down on those streets and hear what they are saying for himself demonstrates he has his head up where the sun does not shine about the protest. He appears to be one of the 1%…afraid to really listen to or examine the real reasons for these protest.

JUSTICE and ACCOUNTABILITY on all fronts!

Here is David Brooke’s arrogant piece. (unable to link)
.Op-Ed Columnist
The Milquetoast RadicalsBy DAVID BROOKS
October 10, 2011

The U.S. economy is probably going to stink for a few more years. It is beset by short-term problems (low consumer demand, uncertain housing prices, too much debt) and long-term problems (wage stagnation, rising health care costs, eroding human capital).

.

problems, but we can at least use this winter of recuperation to address the country’s underlying structural ones. Do tax reform, fiscal reform, education reform and political reform so that when the economy finally does recover the prosperity is deep, broad and strong.

Unfortunately, the country has been wasting this winter of recuperation. Nothing of consequence has been achieved over the past two years. Instead, there have been a series of trivial sideshows. It’s as if people can’t keep their minds focused on the big things. They get diverted by scuffles that are small, contentious and symbolic.

Take the Occupy Wall Street movement. This uprising was sparked by the magazine Adbusters, previously best known for the 2004 essay, “Why Won’t Anyone Say They Are Jewish?” — an investigative report that identified some of the most influential Jews in America and their nefarious grip on policy.

If there is a core theme to the Occupy Wall Street movement, it is that the virtuous 99 percent of society is being cheated by the richest and greediest 1 percent.

This is a theme that allows the people in the 99 percent to think very highly of themselves. All their problems are caused by the nefarious elite.

Unfortunately, almost no problem can be productively conceived in this way. A group that divides the world between the pure 99 percent and the evil 1 percent will have nothing to say about education reform, Medicare reform, tax reform, wage stagnation or polarization. They will have nothing to say about the way Americans have overconsumed and overborrowed. These are problems that implicate a much broader swath of society than the top 1 percent.

They will have no realistic proposal to reduce the debt or sustain the welfare state. Even if you tax away 50 percent of the income of those making between $1 million and $10 million, you only reduce the national debt by 1 percent, according to the Tax Foundation. If you confiscate all the income of those making more than $10 million, you reduce the debt by 2 percent. You would still be nibbling only meekly around the edges.

The 99-versus-1 frame is also extremely self-limiting. If you think all problems flow from a small sliver of American society, then all your solutions are going to be small, too. The policy proposals that have been floating around the Occupy Wall Street movement — a financial transfer tax, forgiveness for student loans — are marginal.

The Occupy Wall Street movement may look radical, but its members’ ideas are less radical than those you might hear at your average Rotary Club. Its members may hate capitalism. A third believe the U.S. is no better than Al Qaeda, according to a New York magazine survey, but since the left no longer believes in the nationalization of industry, these “radicals” really have no systemic reforms to fall back on.

They are not the only small thinkers. President Obama promises not to raise taxes on the bottom 98 percent. The Occupy-types celebrate the bottom 99 percent. Republicans promise not to raise taxes on the bottom 100 percent. Through these and other pledges, leaders of all three movements are hedging themselves in. They are severely limiting the scope of their proposed solutions.

The thing about the current moment is that the moderates in suits are much more radical than the pierced anarchists camping out on Wall Street or the Tea Party-types.

Look, for example, at a piece Matt Miller wrote for The Washington Post called “The Third Party Stump Speech We Need.” Miller is a former McKinsey consultant and Clinton staffer. But his ideas are much bigger than anything you hear from the protesters: slash corporate taxes and raise energy taxes, aggressively use market forces and public provisions to bring down health care costs; raise capital requirements for banks; require national service; balance the budget by 2018.

Other economists, for example, have revived the USA Tax, first introduced in 1995 by Senators Sam Nunn and Pete Domenici. This would replace the personal income and business tax regime with a code that allows unlimited deduction for personal savings and business investment. It’s a consumption tax through the back door, which would clean out loopholes and weaken lobbyists.

Don’t be fooled by the clichés of protest movements past. The most radical people today are the ones that look the most boring. It’s not about declaring war on some nefarious elite. It’s about changing behavior from top to bottom. Let’s occupy ourselves.

The “cult” issue

I grew up Catholic. 12 years of Catholic schools. Priest lived across the street, Sister of Nortre Dame across the alley. The Nuns were the backbone of the church yet never given any credit. I think I saw too much. Hypocrisy runneth over.
Although many of those nuns made us aware of civil rights issues, common decency, trying to live by “do unto others as you would have done to you” The strongest message I was left with growing up Catholic was “WE are ALL born in the image of likeness of God” That message resonated

I am not Catholic, left the church as soon as I could at 18. Just too many contradictions, hypocrisy. Yet embraced the deepest truths. Then studied Buddhism, other comparative religions. Many of the same basic truths run through so many religious and spiritual beliefs. Always contradictions.

But in my book all Religions are basically “cults” based on the definition of cult. Catholicism, Judaism, Christians, Muslim, Lutherans, Mormons, Buddhism etc etc.

Someone tell me which religions are not “cults”