Trending Topics:

War on Drugs, War on Terror, War on the Poor

on 11 Comments
War on terror war on drugs 1
Coming to a New York near you: Soldiers map Afghanis

“Human mapping”? This has something to do with DNA, right? You plot out all those genomes, and pretty soon you can rebuild Einstein from some vitamin pills and a teaspoon of battery fluid. Before you put that primeval soup on the stove, though, be aware the phrase means other things. In Afghanistan, “‘human maps‘ help fight Taliban”:

“I’m 105 years old,” said Bismiullah, an old man stopped by a patrol in southern Afghanistan as part of military efforts to map the population in the battle against the Taliban. …

Troops in the region and across Afghanistan are gathering photographs, fingerprints and employment details as well as canvassing opinions from local residents to find out what they want for the war-racked province. The goal is to strengthen relations between pro-government forces and the local population.

But the information gathered can also help troops catch Taliban fighters, for example by matching fingerprints on home-made bombs or guns.

Formally known as human terrain mapping, the process is a key strand of the strategy to build better ties between pro-government forces and local people as the war enters arguably its most important year.

Yes, fingerprinting centenarians is a great way to win hearts and minds! As with most counter-insurgency efforts, however, those organs are less important than controlling musculature and movement. In Vietnam or Malaysia, the imperial powers isolated populations in “strategic hamlets” to keep them away from rebel forces. Now you use information and the associated technologies to identify people, fix loyalties and locations, survey where people go. “The guerrilla must swim in the people as the fish swims in the sea,” Mao said, more or less. The old idea was to drain the water and leave the fish exposed and flopping. Now, you tag it with an electronic beeper, and later set a drone after it. Politics as animal control!

We don’t have guerrillas here in the United States, but you can never be too careful. That, at least, is the argument behind the New York Police Department’s recently revealed, hugely controversial surveillance plan to keep tabs on Muslims. The Associated Press’s reporting on this in the last few months has unveiled an enormous domestic intelligence program, arguably the most insidious since the COINTELPRO probes honeycombed the Left back in the 1960s. There were “mosque crawlers” sent to infiltrate places of worship; there were spies on student groups at jihadist caravanserais like Yale; there was “human mapping” of “communities of interest” and “Locations of Concern.” A “Location of Concern,” so the cops’ secret papers say, is a

–Localized center of activity for a particular ethnic group.
–Location that persons of concern may be attracted to.
–Location that individuals may frequent to search for ethnic companionship.
–Location that individuals may find co-conspirators for illegal actions.

Or: a “Popular hangout or meeting location for a particular ethnic group that provides a forum for listening to neighborhood gossip or otherwise provide an overall feel for the community.”

And there are literal maps:

Profiling map
Profiling map

In addition to Egyptians, Afghanis, and Nigerians in teeming Newark, the NYPD also mapped out Brazilians and Portuguese. Each fado may conceal a fatwa, if you play it backwards. The flame of the churrascaria burns in the eyes of the martyrs.

Plenty of people have condemned New York’s spy system since the story broke, but the Obama administration has been quiet. We have learned that US government money went to pay for the local secret-police work:

The money is part of a little-known grant intended to help law enforcement fight drug crimes. Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the Bush and Obama administrations have provided $135 million to the New York and New Jersey region through the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area program, known as HIDTA….

The White House HIDTA grant program was established at the height of the drug war to help police fight drug gangs and unravel supply routes. It has provided about $2.3 billion to local authorities in the past decade.

The War on Drugs morphed, like a late-model Terminator, into the War on Terror. “After the terror attacks, law enforcement was allowed to use some of that money to fight terrorism.” We don’t know exactly how much is some: “NYPD intelligence operations receive scant oversight in New York. Congress, which approves the money for the program, is not provided with a detailed breakdown of activities.” $1.3 million of the money, though, went to buy cars that “have been used to photograph mosques and record the license plates of worshipers.”

In addition … the White House money pays for part of the office space the intelligence division shares with other agencies in Manhattan. When police compiled lists of Muslims who took new, Americanized names, they kept those records on HIDTA computer servers. That was ongoing as recently as October, city officials said.

Many NYPD intelligence officers, including those that conducted surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods, had HIDTA email addresses. Briefing documents for Kelly, the police commissioner, were compiled on HIDTA computers. Those documents described what police informants were hearing inside mosques and which academic conferences Muslim scholars attended.

When police wanted to pay a confidential informant, they were told to sign onto the HIDTA website to file the paperwork…

The truth is that governance in the US has been slipping fully into the modes and mindset of a security state for a long time. The government sees large parts of its population not as citizens or constituencies, but as potential objects of a counterinsurgency campaign.

Eye of Sauron

The security state no longer legitimates itself by safeguarding the general welfare. Neoliberalized and mortgaged up to its testicles, it’s given up on that. It defines itself by its ability to defend the borders: to provide military triumphs, a sufficient if never unquestionable sense of safety, and some colorful, invigorating rah-rah . Since there is a limit to how often threats from outside can be conjured or concocted, it eventually turns to other enemies, internal, intestinal. Its purpose becomes defending part of the population against another part.

The War on Drugs, far from being a placid predecessor of the Terror Games, was a perfect template. It identified marked, ethnically defined groups within the citizenry as Communities of Interest (and don’t think I mean the white suburbanites who recharged the coke market in the ’80s). It mapped out Locations of Concern, and helped resegragate the Interestees in them. It charted a new geography. It plotted out the ties of import and exchange that linked Concernful places inside the boundaries — in inner cities, in shuttered crack houses, in the mulling guts of migrant women — to strategic Concerns and enemies abroad, from Colombia to Kandahar. The internal crisis became a cause for external action. We devastated Panama, or seized the poppy fields of Afghanistan, because invisible tendrils tied them to our own neighborhoods. The sense of mysterious linkage made for menace, but out of it we recuperated the knowledge that we were different, and better. (Steven Soderbergh’s weird, fantasy movie Traffic, about the drug trade, makes the myths explicit: he filmed the Mexico scenes on old, yellow stock, as if foreign air were made of different chemicals and, once immersed in it, you start swimming through molasses.)

War at home and war abroad cooperated. Other nations’ sovereignties surrender to our impotence over what happens within our own. Most recently, the US presided over a massacre in Jamaica: local police and military killed dozens of civilians in order to capture a single drug lord who had offended against the Americans. What we ask of our allies in South America or the Caribbean is that they become slightly less chaotic versions of Waziristan.

This means, too, that the Wars on Drugs and on Terror amount in essence to a single War: the big one, on the Poor. Mike Davis wrote a decade ago about the coming urban landscapes where states will control unemployed and disenfranchised masses of migrants with force. That’s what you’ve got in Brazil. What the US pushed Jamaica’s government to do, Dilma Roussef did at her own discretion (with, to be sure, the added push of cleaning up Rio for the coming Olympics): she called in the military to invade and clean up the favelas.

The NYPD, I’m afraid, is onto something. It’s true that the closest thing to a terror attack on the city in the last decade was foiled, not by their millions in surveillance money, but by a T-shirt vendor who noticed an oddly smoking car in Times Square. But for Mayor Bloomberg, this only means we have to enlist the entire T-shirt vending community as permanent informers. Faced with the fact that “The NYPD routinely monitored the websites, blogs and forums of Muslim student associations at colleges including Yale, Columbia University and the University of Pennsylvania,” he answered: “If going on websites and looking for information is not what Yale stands for, I don’t know.” We need an enemy, and if a sophomore blogger is what we’re stuck with, run with what you got. The watching cameras multiply. This is our new world, where all the wars are civil wars.

Scott Long

Scott Long, a visiting fellow at Harvard Law School, served as founding director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch. He has been a human rights activist campaigning for sexual rights for over twenty years, working in countries including Albania, Egypt, Hungary, Iraq, Jamaica, Romania, South Africa, Zimbabwe, and the United States. He blogs on human rights issues at

Other posts by .

Posted In:

11 Responses

  1. LeaNder on March 1, 2012, 1:50 pm

    Dear editors, your link above – – does not work. But I do not quite understand why, maybe it’s the dot at the end.

    • annie on March 1, 2012, 7:45 pm

      leaNder, could you be more specific. what is the text appearing that embeds the link?

  2. DICKERSON3870 on March 1, 2012, 1:58 pm

    RE: “the Wars on Drugs and on Terror amount in essence to a single War: the big one, on the Poor. Mike Davis wrote a decade ago about the coming urban landscapes where states will control unemployed and disenfranchised masses of migrants with force.” ~ Scott Long

    FOR INSTANCE: “Police ‘Tank’ Purchase Riles New Hampshire Town”, by Radley Balko, HuffPo, 2/16/12

    (excerpt) “We’re going to have our own tank.”
    That’s what Keene, N.H., Mayor Kendall Lane whispered to Councilman Mitch Greenwald during a December city council meeting.
    It’s not quite a tank. But the quaint town of 23,000 — scene of just two murders since 1999 — had just accepted a $285,933 grant from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to purchase a Bearcat, an eight-ton armored personnel vehicle made by Lenco Industries Inc…
    …Since the 1990s, the Pentagon has made military equipment available to local police departments for free or at steep discounts. This, along with drug war-related policies, has spurred a trend toward a more militarized domestic police force in America. Law enforcement and elected officials have argued for years that better-armed, high-powered police departments are needed to fight the war on drugs.
    Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the war on terror has accelerated the trend toward militarization.
    Homeland Security hands out anti-terrorism grants to cities and towns, many specifically to buy military-grade equipment from companies like Lenco. In December, the Center for Investigative Reporting reported that Homeland Security grants totalled $34 billion, and went to such unlikely terrorism targets as Fargo, N.D.; Fon du Lac, Wisc.; and Canyon County, Idaho…

    SOURCE –

    • DICKERSON3870 on March 1, 2012, 2:57 pm

      RE: “Homeland Security grants totalled $34 billion, and went to such unlikely terrorism targets as Fargo, N.D…” ~ from above

      MY COMMENT: I would love to see what the Coen brothers could do with this in a sequel to their film Fargo (1996)!

      Fargo (1996) –
      Fargo (Trailer) [VIDEO, 01:58] –

      • DICKERSON3870 on March 4, 2012, 11:20 pm

        P.S. SEE: Local police stockpile high-tech, combat-ready gear, By Andrew Becker, Center for Investigative Reporting, 12/21/11

        (excerpt) If terrorists ever target Fargo, N.D., the local police will be ready.
        In recent years, they have bought bomb-detection robots, digital communications equipment and Kevlar helmets, like those used by soldiers in foreign wars. For local siege situations requiring real firepower, police there can use a new $256,643 armored truck, complete with a rotating turret. Until that day, however, the menacing truck is mostly used for training runs and appearances at the annual Fargo picnic, where it’s been displayed near a children’s bounce house…


      • annie on March 5, 2012, 2:17 am

        sure as heck beats health care

      • Proton Soup on March 5, 2012, 3:09 am

        yup. i realized a long time ago that the War on Drugs was never intended to be won. the War on Drugs is a recipe for overtime pay and swag. so it benefits the local officers as well as industry. it’s a sort of militarized police industrial complex. plus, the racist component of preferentially-harsh penalties for some, who get sent to work in private prison industries, which is all legal because slavery was never abolished – the 13th amendment explicitly allows it as punishment. and this is only one of the ways drugs weakens a people you want to dominate.

        and so i agree with the author here that War on Terror is the same thing, really. but with the exception that it is all preceded by the War is a Racket model exposed by Smedley Butler, and reiterated by Eisenhower as the Military Industrial (Academic) Complex. Smedley’s short book is also a gem for it’s rape of the poor expose, where the poor here are the soldiers themselves.

  3. Charon on March 1, 2012, 2:26 pm

    I gullibly used to buy it, but the war against invisible ambiguous (insert blanket term for boogeyman of the week) is a war against freedom. And a meaningless war at that. It is probably not a coincidence that such “wars” are often directly responsible for creating enemies. Iran-Contra, for example, is directly responsible for creating the infamous Los Zetas. Arming Saddam likely played an important role in his “rise to power” and the two wars we had that followed. Bin Laden and Noriega are also infamous for being former CIA assets. No conspiracy there at all, although certain folks get mad when you mention Bin Laden being one. An inconvienant fact, and one that is ridiculously denied or ignored.

    I wonder what the agenda behind keeping tabs on Muslims and mosques is? Because as much as the Zionists demonize Islam, they have to know that the vast majority are innocent. IMO somebody is probably monitoring them for intelligence purposes. As in clandestine shadowy ops using Islam as a disguise. The truth is stranger than fiction

  4. annie on March 1, 2012, 7:46 pm

    this is painful to read. what has happened to us?

    • Chaos4700 on March 4, 2012, 6:58 am

      We lost the war for our country, Annie, a war we didn’t even know we were fighting. And now we’re prisoners of our own hostile, racist, corrupt, Israelified government.

  5. Eva Smagacz on March 2, 2012, 5:12 am

    West has been conquered by the Eastern concept of citizen as vassals to the elite, and the East has been conquered by the Western concept of popular culture as an acceptable opium for the masses.

    Yet, as the political movements are made of small steps of first few, then many, we can only persevere in changing the opinions of those around us.

    Why do you think that the influential, persuasive and vocal prisoners are now kept in Communication Management Units?

    Greetings to the monitors from Local anti-terrorist branch, and to monitors from Israel Lobby.

Leave a Reply