News

Wallace interview with Ahmadinejad was little more than deliberate demonization

Since Mike Wallace passed away we’ve run a few pieces highlighting his coverage of Israel/Palestine. But not all of his work was exemplary. From Nima Shirazi’s March 2010 piece entitled, “ ‘Néjàd Vu, All Over Again: The Media, Pretext, Context, & 9/11“:

In early August 2006, Iranian President Ahmadinejad was interviewed on the CBS program 60 Minutes by veteran journalist Mike Wallace. A heavily-edited, hour-long version of the discussion, featuring overdubbed narration by Wallace, was broadcast nationally. In response to Wallace’s question about Ahmadinejad’s supposed proposal to “wipe Israel off the map” (which Wallace claimed the Iranian President had “said time and again”), Ahmadinejad replied, “I think that the Israeli government is a fabricated government.” Wallace then editorialized (via post-production voice-over) that this “fabrication” of Israel followed the Holocaust, “which [Ahmadinejad]’s said may also have been fabricated,” and continued, “Last December, Ahmadinejad said the Europeans had created a myth of the Holocaust.”

The interview made headlines around the world and Ahmadinejad’s reputation as a genocidal threat to Israel and a confrontational denier of the Holocaust was duly cemented in the hearts and minds of Western audiences. But those threats and denials came from Wallace’s voice-over, not Ahmadinejad’s actual words.

A few days after the CBS hatchet-job was broadcast, and at the request of Ahmadinejad himself, the complete, unedited, 90-minute interview was shown on C-SPAN. Thus, it became clear what had been deliberately omitted from the widely-seen 60 Minutes version. Apparently, Ahmadinejad’s response to Wallace’s question about Israel was truncated mid-sentence and his subsequent explanation was cut outright. This is what he actually said, but which CBS refused to show (keep in mind, nothing but the first half of the first sentence was aired):

I think that the Israeli government is a fabricated government and I have talked about the solution. The solution is democracy. We have said ‘allow Palestinian people to participate in a free and fair referendum to express their views.’ What we are saying only serves the cause of durable peace. We want durable peace in that part of the world. A durable peace will only come about with once the views of the people are met.

So we said ‘allow the people of Palestine to participate in a referendum to choose their desired government,’ and of course, for the war to come an end as well. Why are they refusing to allow this to go ahead? Even the Palestinian administration and government which has been elected by the people is being attacked on a daily basis, and its high-ranking officials are assassinated and arrested. Yesterday, the speaker of the Palestinian parliament was arrested, elected by the people, mind you. So how long can this go on?

We believe that this problem has to be dealt with fundamentally. I believe that the American government is blindly supporting this government of occupation. It should lift its support, allow the people to participate in free and fair elections. Whatever happens let it be. We will accept and go along. The result will be as you said earlier, sir.

No military threats, only a call for democratic elections and a government that represents the will of the people. But none of that made it into the final cut of the interview shown on CBS.

Rather than allow Ahmadinejad to speak for himself, Wallace and his production team at CBS decided to create their own narrative, shaped by decontextualized quotes, selective editing, and subjective voice-overs by the renowned interviewer. As a result, the interview that aired was little more than deliberate demonization, anti-Iranian propaganda, and purposefully obfuscated what the Iranian President had actually said to his interlocutor in order to further propagate a false narrative of an Iran is an “existential threat” to Israel and which officially denies the Holocaust.  In response to a question about the severity of the editing of Ahmadinejad’s response to Wallace’s Israel question, Robert G. Anderson, the producer of the interview segment, reportedly stated, “I made that edit and I stand by it and completely disagree with your misinterpretation.”

As a result of this undeniable censorship and intentional obfuscation of truth in service of propaganda by a mainstream media outlet and respected reporter, Mike Wallace won his 21st Emmy Award for the Ahmadinejad interview.

35 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Worth watching, for comparison: Wallace, incredulous but not demonizing, interviews the Shah in the mid-70s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kySR3fpa5s

That is “deliberate demonization”. Amazing how even with a ‘free media” it it can happen time and time again….and no one calls them out for it.

My favorite Ahmadinejad interview is the one where George Stamatopoulos(?) ran with the ‘Osama is Iran meme’.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rK_-kZAIpT0

Just reflecting here. Maybe the price to be paid for Wallace’s questioning of Israel/Zionism was this highly edited interview. Maybe(?) there’s a sad, but enforced balancing act in play. The principle point, to me, is that the initial, real, motivated observations/reporting come out, to be built upon, and the subsequent, suspect “reconciliation-ary” reporting has to be take for what it’s worth. Enforced.

W&M, Carter, Goldstone, MJ, here, and Beinart to a lesser degree. But nonetheless, the truth (or the stridently-questioned prevailing view), at intervals, percolates up and out in major media.

On multiple-choice tests you are counseled to go with your first inclination. The same applies here to Wallace and all the above. Their first take was and should be the operative one.

Mr. Shirazi, please pay back what NIAC gave you and distance yourself from Trita Parsi. You want to wrote about iraq, palestine, go ahead. But don’t start defending the AN. All this will come back and haunt you.

From the end of the deleted segment:

We believe that this problem has to be dealt with fundamentally. I
believe that the American government is blindly supporting this
government of occupation. It should lift its support, allow the people
to participate in free and fair elections. Whatever happens let it be.
We will accept and go along. The result will be as you said earlier,
sir.

MR.
WALLACE: Look, I mean no disrespect. Let’s make a deal. I will listen
to your complete answers if you’ll stay for all of my questions. My
concern is that we might run out of time.

PRESIDENT
AHMADINEJAD: Well, you’re free to ask me any questions you please, and
I am hoping that I’m free to be able to say whatever is on my mind. You
are free to put any question you want to me, and of course, please give
me the right to respond fully to your questions to say what is on my
mind.

Wallace said that he was willing to listen to Ahmadinejad’s complete answers. His editor did not give the American public a similar opportunity. But hey, the Bush Administration was breathing down their necks and they got another Emmy; so it was a win for the show.