Trending Topics:

During hour-long interview at Saban Forum, no one dared ask Lieberman about corruption case that cost him his job

on 3 Comments

Today Avigdor Lieberman resigned as Foreign Minister because of a longrunning investigation of corruption charges. Well two weeks ago, Lieberman was feted by the Saban Forum in Washington, and Robert Siegel of NPR spent an hour on stage with him, asking him many questions– and didn’t once ask him about this investigation. Nor did anyone else at the Saban Forum, which is part of the Brookings Institution.

Shouldn’t Americans have known about this case? Should a Foreign Minister under suspicion of corruption get away without being asked about it at a DC thinktank? Should a leading American journalist let Lieberman slide on the matter? I gather the case has been going on for many years; Annie Robbins likens it to the Ken Starr investigation of Bill Clinton over the Monica Lewinsky case… From Haaretz:

According to allegations, between 2001-2008 a period in which Lieberman served as a Knesset member and minister, foreign businessmen, among them Martin Schlaff, Mikhail Chernoy and Daniel Gittenstein, transferred hundreds of millions dollars to companies owned by Lieberman in Israel, Cyprus and the British Virgin Islands. Upon returning to politics after a hiatus of two years (2004-2006), Lieberman declared that he had sold his interests in these companies and was no longer connected to them. However, according to the prosecution’s investigation, he continued to receive large sums of money, even after resuming public life.

This just underlines my charge against the Saban Forum: It is an Israel lobby organization. It serves to bolster the special relationship between the Israelis and Americans. Far be it from the Saban Forum to cast any question about Lieberman’s bona fides.

Yes: Thrice now I’ve raised questions about Siegel’s service to the lobby at the Saban Forum. Another question: Martin Indyk introduced Siegel at the fete. Well then a few days later Siegel brought Indyk on to NPR to ask him about the conflict. The one hand washing the other school of journalism.

Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is senior editor of and founded the site in 2005-06.

Other posts by .

Posted In:

3 Responses

  1. Les on December 14, 2012, 1:40 pm

    Thanks Phil. Siegel inviting Indyk to NPR is a reminder that our media serve’s as the Israel Lobby’s echo chamber. If I want to continue to be uninformed about Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, I need only continue listening to NPR and reading the New York Times.

    • Reds on December 14, 2012, 3:40 pm

      Indyk , Talber, Ross amazing enough are nearly always included as the voice a objective observers by NPR, than hosted on it’s local NPR stations pretending that Saban or WINEP are made up of netural experts.

      Siegel’s MO(among others)
      Rise=Pro-Israeli properganda presented as objective news presents Pro-Israeli talking point or refines it

      Wash=Host rehashes talking points propagandist creds “Joining us now is _____ from the non-parstian center insert “WINEP” “SABAN” followed up with a maybe lead with a “Why are____ doing/acting/saying ___ to/about Israel?” How is Israel protecting/solving/defending themselve on_____ aggression. Than a follow up with a clip by President/SOS/Congressman/women saying Israel has a right to defend themselve or something along those lines.

      Repeat= Said Propagandist hits other MSM outlets and Member stations,host than repeats eariler questions/comments made by a eariler host allow for Said Propagandist to tweak if need response.

  2. HPH on December 14, 2012, 10:46 pm

    Evidently there were no journalists at the Saban event.

Leave a Reply