News

Boston Globe reporter defends absence of Bedouin and Palestinians from article on water in the Negev

Boston
Bostonglobe.com screenshot

Boston-area Palestinian rights activist Nancy Murray recently wrote Boston Globe reporter Erin Ailworth about her November 17th article “In Israel, water where there was none” and you can read their correspondence below. Here’s a taste of Ailworth’s article:

On the chalky lower slopes of the Hebron Hills, in the midst of the scorched Israeli desert, there is an expanse known as “Green land,” where grapes grow lush on the vine, fruit orchards flourish, and a man-made forest of more than 4 million trees rises toward the sky.

Called Yatir, the forest and the vineyards it surrounds are potent symbols of Israel’s battle with nature. With science, technology, and, yes, a good amount of chutzpah, the arid country has figured out what few other desert regions have: how to squeeze enough water from a parched landscape to sustain a nation.

You can see Joel Wood’s Mondoweiss post on the same article here for more information on Yatir.

Murray wrote Ailworth to challenge her on the absolute lack of context in her piece regarding water in Israel/Palestine, and the inequity that exists between Israeli Jews, Bedouin and Palestinian citizens of Israel and Palestinians living under occupation (Ed. note: Ailworth’s reporting appeared in the Globe but was funded through the International Center for Journalists’ Bringing Home the World program).

Here is their exchange:

From: Nancy Murray
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:04:12 -0500
To: <erin.ailworth@globe.com>

Subject: Your November 17 piece on Israel and Water

Hello Erin Ailworth,

I too just returned from a trip to Israel and after reading your piece, feel we must have been visiting completely different places.  Or perhaps you didn’t talk to any Palestinians – either those who are citizens of Israel and who are being cleared out of the Negev desert while water-greedy eucalyptus trees are being planted over their land or those under occupation
whose West Bank aquifer has been appropriated by Israel, leaving them with only a fraction of the water to which Israeli settlers have access?

Are you really unaware that Israel was not built on “once-barren land” but on the destruction of Palestinian villages and appropriation of groves of fruit trees and Bedouin grazing land. Where do you think ‘Jaffa oranges’, for instance, came from?

Your article appeared straight from the ‘Brand Israel’ hasbara mill – in short, propaganda.  I would have expected considerably more from the International Center for Journalists’ ‘Bringing Home the World’ program.

Dr. Nancy Murray
Cambridge, MA

Ailworth responded:

From: “Ailworth, Erin” <eailworth@globe.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:09:24 -0500
To: Nancy Murray

Subject: Re: Your November 17 piece on Israel and Water

Nancy —

I recognize that Israel evokes many emotions in people, and that everyone will have their different viewpoint on the political issues there.

The story I wrote was focused on water technology, rather than politics. My editor and I discussed the West Bank and Palestine and what role, if any they should play in my story. Given my lack of knowledge of those areas, and the limited amount of time I was able to spend in Israel, we felt it was better to err on the side of caution rather than try to tackle a tense, politically charged topic that I am not yet well-versed in. What you read is a true representation of the time I spent in Israel and the conversations that I had with people while there.

I hope to write more about water issues, but will leave stories about the West Bank and Palestine to those reporters who are more of an expert on the topic than I am.

Thanks for reading — Erin

Murray wrote Ailworth back to challenge her assertion that it is possible to separate water and politics in Israel/Palestine, and on the fact that she doesn’t seem to be aware that there are Palestinians and Bedouin who live in Israel, not just the West Bank:

From: Nancy Murray
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:09:21 -0500
To: “Ailworth, Erin” <eailworth@globe.com>

Subject: Re: Your November 17 piece on Israel and Water

Hello Erin,
Thanks for your reply.

I would argue that there is simply no way to write about water in Israel without taking politics into consideration.   And  in my comments to you, I am not referring just to the ‘West Bank’ and ‘Palestine.’   Bedouin – some 70,000 of them — whose land and sources of water are now being stolen in the Negev to make way for just about the most inappropriate kind of trees one can imagine being planted in a desert (eucalyptus trees – which are often used to drain swamps) – are ISRAELIS.  So are the Palestinians of the Nazareth/Galilee region who are Israeli citizens but also face discrimination in the allocation of water as in everything else.   Why?  Because as citizens, they have citizenship rights to water but not NATIONAL rights to water.  Only Jews get enjoy national rights – they get their water subsidized by the State and Palestinian farmers WITHIN ISRAEL simply can’t compete.

If you have another chance to go to Israel I suggest you talk to some non Jewish citizens, who make up at least 20 percent of the total and are the people (or the descendants of people) whose methods of farming were very much in tune with the ecology of the region before the State of Israel planted non-indigenous forests to disguise their destroyed villages and started perpetrating myths about ‘making the desert bloom.”

Nancy

Ailworth has not yet responded.

29 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ah, the “Sorry, I’m really ignorant” journalism defense. Well played.

/sarcasm

Nancy Murray has supported Palestinian rights since the 1980s. Glad to see she is still active.

I imagine that water-supply in I/P is roughly a zero-sum game: If Israel takes it, Palestinians (somewhere) must thereby lose it. It may be true that you can “make” water via energy-expensive desalination from sea water, but the mere possibility does not mean that anyone is doing it. It certainly does not mean that Israel is making water (at high expense in energy) and then giving it to Palestinians. Giving? Where is such “giving” written? Maybe selling. It wouldn’t surprise me if Israel was stealing surface and ground water from Palestinians and then selling them water — maybe the same water just stolen !! — even from desalination.

The very idea that Israel would permit and encourage the growing of water-hungry trees, or cotton, or various other crops in a land chronically short of water is per se appalling. But that they would do so when Palestinians are so desperate for water is criminal.

And add to that Israel’s “management” of water in the West Bank — destroying Palestinian water tanks, destroying Palestinian wells, limiting the depth of Palestinian wells while not limiting the depth of Israeli wells (“water apartheid”) — all are part of the poisonous oppression by which Israel seeks to depopulate Palestine.

And the USA supports all this. When asked, they say they oppose some of it. But there is precious little evidence of even lip-service to such American opposition to Israeli oppression of Palestinians. Makes one ashamed to be an American.

The article is one-sided even if it is considered purely on technological terms. It does not address two basic issues:

a. are there negative effects of technologies that Israelis are pushing?

For example, transporting water away from Galilee is decreasing the flow to the Dead Sea where the levels are dropping. This is compounded by extraction of water from other sources from where the water would flow, above or underground, to the Dead Sea.

The second example is the extensive use of drip irrigation. Any irrigation scheme that uses “just enough” water tends to use enough for growing of the crops and not enough to flush the soil from salt, so over the years salt may accumulate.

b. How original are the “Israeli technologies”? A lot of technologically advanced counties have water issues and a lot of solutions, like USA, Australia, Spain, Israel, Germany and so on. It is not like drip irrigation, reverse osmosis, or tests for microbial contamination were exclusively or even primarily Israeli inventions and products.

The article reads like written by a typical English major with no knowledge of technology, agriculture and economics and who was gently tutored by people selected for interviews. Sadly, this is pretty much standard for the genre.

The other aspect is that the cited phrase sounds quite sinister:

the arid country has figured out what few other desert regions have: how to squeeze enough water from a parched landscape to sustain a nation

Instantly it evokes enviromental and social issues. How to turn Eastern California from a desert to complete desert to let LA thrive? When you squeeze water from one place, you deprive another. And of course the uniquely Israeli issue of squeezing water from the landscape that has population and agriculture. Ignoring environmental and social dimension of water policies and technologies makes crappy reporting.

Lazy reporting is the norm. However, by the author admission, here it is not laziness but self-censorship.

And now for the ‘facts’.

http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2009/06/30/000333037_20090630003234/Rendered/INDEX/476570SR0P11511nsReport18Apr2009111.txt

Part I. The current situation in the Palestinian water sector Part I of the Report reviews the status of the Palestinian water sector thirteen years after the Oslo accord, and quantifies and discusses impacts on the Palestinian people, on water resources, and on the environment.

West Bank water resources and services Palestinians have access to one fifth of the resources of the Mountain Aquifer. Palestinians abstract about 20% of the “estimated potential” of the aquifers that underlie both the West Bank and Israel. Israel abstracts the balance, and in addition overdraws without JWC approval on the “estimated potential” by more than 50%, up to 1.8 times its share under Oslo.

Over-extraction by deep wells combined with reduced recharge has created risks for the aquifers and a decline in water available to Palestinians through shallower wells. (Chapter 1) Water withdrawals per head of the Palestinian population have been declining, and there are real water shortages. Palestinian abstractions have actually declined over the last ten years, under the combined effect of dropping water tables and restricted drilling, deepening and rehabilitation of wells. Water withdrawals per capita for Palestinians in the West Bank are about one quarter of those available to Israelis, and have declined over the last decade. By regional standards, Palestinians have the lowest access to fresh water resources. The low availability and high cost of water have led to shortages and coping strategies, with some West Bank Palestinian communities carrying out unlicensed drilling to obtain drinking water. (Chapter 1)

Following the 1967 War, Israel took control of water resources, and developed wells, throughout the West Bank, together with a water supply network serving settlements that linked into the Mekorot network.

Palestinian water rights in the West Bank were abrogated, including from the Jordan river.

The amount that Mekorot supplies to the settlements is unofficially estimated at some 75 MCM, of which 44 MCM is produced from wells controlled by Israel or settlers within the West Bank.
Israel also pumps 10 MCM from wells in the West Bank to sell to Palestinian providers and consumers.

In addition to extraction of water within the West Bank to supply to settlements, Israel also pumps about 10 MCM of water from wells in the West Bank that it then sells to the Palestinians through Mekorot.19

Report No. 47657-GZ WEST BANK AND GAZA ASSESSMENT OF RESTRICTIONS ON PALESTINIAN WATER SECTOR DEVELOPMENT Sector Middle East and North Africa Region Sustainable Development The World Bank

“Ah, the “Sorry, I’m really ignorant” journalism defense. Well played.”

Read Ailworth’s blog that attached to the sidebar go this original article- she’s not as naive and innocent and she publicly presents herself.