‘NYT’ editorial on US military aid leaves out Palestinians because it knows it would lose the argument

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

There is no comments thread available on this New York Times editorial that says it’s good Israel got a renewed aid package from the U.S. this week, but maybe it was a little too much aid. And there’s a good reason why.

The editorial notes Donald Trump’s notion of making Israel pay for the defense aid it gets from the U.S., then says, “the idea, which would have infuriated many American voters, seems to have died.” Really? Who would be infuriated? Which voters? (Or donors.)

As for Palestine and the Palestinians, they go unmentioned, except indirectly. The Gaza War is mentioned, but only in the context of Israeli casualties being low.

millions more were tacked on annually at Congress’s discretion [between 2007 and 2017] for the “Iron Dome” missile defense system that helped prevent Israeli casualties during the 2014 conflict in Gaza.

There is no mention of the 2300 Palestinians killed by US supplied weapons during that conflict. Hamas is described as a proxy group for Iran, but they are on opposite sides on Syria and word is that relations are cool and– besides, Hamas is a homegrown Palestinian party, it is not some Iranian proxy.

The need for the aid is taken for granted. The Times merely questions how much; “in truth, the aid package is already too big.”

What’s interesting is how obvious it is they are deliberately ignoring the Palestinians. Not the slightest hint of any human rights concerns regarding the aid, and no comments thread where the pesky readers might point out the elephant in the room.

It’s contemptible, but it’s also pathetic. They know they’d lose the argument, so they prevent any mention of it on their site.

They are probably planning future articles on the antisemitism of BDS.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Is Sen. Leahy (iirc) going to go forward with his hearings on the legality of this aid, absent a certification that it adheres to US human rights LAW? Oh never mind. That possibility (Ie. the smallest wisp of a hint that maybe not all is quite right/legal with aid to Israel) is probably not in the NYT editorial either (should I have read it?). Just curious, but does the NYT disallow comments on all their… Read more »

RE: “Hamas is described (by the NYT) as a proxy group for Iran . . .” ~ Phil Weiss and Donald Johnson SEE: “How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas”, By Andrew Higgins, The Wall Street Journal, 01/24/09 [EXCERPT] Surveying the wreckage of a neighbor’s bungalow hit by a Palestinian rocket, retired Israeli official Avner Cohen traces the missile’s trajectory back to an “enormous, stupid mistake” made 30 years ago. “Hamas, to my great regret, is… Read more »

A site which harshly and arbitrarily sensors diverging opinions is upset that the Times does the same. What goes around…

Keep slugging away at the New York Times, for its craven dishonesty on America’s most pressing, and costly foreign policy problems.