Trending Topics:

Netanyahu’s annexation plan reflects Israeli consensus on a one-state solution

Opinion
on 14 Comments

With the Israeli elections only one week away, Netanyahu is pulling the same tricks he always has to rile up his base and appeal to the far-right in Israel. With polling numbers showing his Likud party and Gantz’s (his former Chief of the General Staff, also known as the Commander-in-Chief of the IDF) Blue and White Party neck in neck, Netanyahu is doing all he can to secure a majority, including – among other things – inciting against Arab Palestinian citizens of Israel, attempting to push through a bill that will allow him to place cameras at the ballots to supress the Arab vote, meeting with the UK’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson to boast about his foreign relations capabilities, and, yesterday, threatning to illegaly annex parts of the West Bank. Speaking to reporters at a press conference, Netanyahu pledged that he will annex the Jordan Valley and parts of the northern Dead Sea – an area that comprises a third of the occupied West Bank – if he is reelected; a promise he also made two days before the previous elections were held.

Netanyahu’s proposed annexation will make the occupied West Bank an enclave within Israel, further restricting the freedom of movement of Palestinians (as if they had a “freedom” to move before), and completely cut off the West Bank from Jordan. This may very well be the first step in Netanyahu’s plan for a one-state solution. Nearly all Arab Palestinian cities, towns, and villages that comprised historic Palestine west of the 1949 armistice line were uprooted and destroyed by Israel during the Nakba. Those that did survive were slowly surrounded by Jewish settlements and cities, wherein they became neighborhoods within larger Jewish cities. Netanyahu is implementing that same strategy to take over the entire West Bank. Surround the entirety of the West Bank and slowly uproot, demolish, and occupy homes and stolen lands until the Palestinian people have no choice but to be a part of Israel!

It is also worth noting the main opposition party’s response to such a declaration. In a statement, the party said:

“The residents of the Jordan Valley are not Netanyahu’s propaganda props. Blue and White has declared that the Jordan Valley will be part of Israel forever. It was Netanyahu who concocted a plan to surrender the Jordan Valley in [peace talks in] 2014.

“We’re glad Netanyahu came to his senses and adopted Blue and White’s plan for recognition of the Jordan Valley.”

This is yet another blunder for the Blue and White party, showing it is nothing more but the Likud with a different name. Netanyahu’s continued push farther to the right has shifted the Overton window drastically to the right of the political spectrum, where so called “centrist” parties now advocate for annexation that is banned under international law according to United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2334, 242, and 446. Netanyahu’s extreme, nationalist rhetoric has lead to a surge in far-right extremism and hate crimes in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, with the Palestinian people facing the brunt of the storm.

So, what does this all mean? For now, probably nothing considering the fact that he has used this play countless times in the past to gain political points and votes at the ballot boxes. However, that does not mean we should not take this statement seriously. With the Trump Administration rolling out its so called “Deal of the Century” peace plan following the Israeli elections, and Trump’s indisputable loyalty to Israel and complete disregard for the Palestinian people, it is safe to say that, given the current circumstances, Donald Trump will very much not only allow Netanyahu to annex parts of the West Bank, but will also recognize Israeli soverighnty over them. Needless to say, Jared Kushner’s “peace” plan so far seems to have no intentions of alleviating the struggles facing the Palestinian people, both within Israel and the West Bank and Gaza. Moreover, with Blue and White not objecting to such a statement, despite branding themselves as a “center-left” party, it is clear there is nothing standing in Netanyahu’s way to finally make good on his long standing promise.

Naim Mousa

Naim Mousa is a Palestinian citizen of Israel, currently living in New York. He is the Media Director of the Friends of Mossawa, a US-based sister organization to the Haifa-based Mossawa Center, which advocates for the rights of Arab Palestinian citizens of Israel.

Other posts by .


Posted In:

14 Responses

  1. eljay on September 11, 2019, 10:26 am

    The greed of hard-core Zionists seems to know no bounds.

  2. Nathan on September 11, 2019, 11:11 am

    Throughout the years, I read the Mondoweiss website, and it’s rather clear that its position is the one-state solution. One reads again and again that the two-state solution is “dead”. Actually, the only rare criticism of the Palestinians in this website is focused on their having signed the Oslo Agreement. So it’s quite surprising to read an article here that complains about the supposed consensus in Israel of reaching a one-state outcome.

    Obviously, no one should take seriously any declaration made in the heat of an election campaign – but that’s beside the point. Surely, there should be some consistency in the “party line” here. If Mondoweiss really supports the idea of the one-state, then there should be some enthusiasm in the above article that the Israelis have adopted the outlook of Mondoweiss. Alas, it turns out that this website doesn’t support finding a solution at all – even if its evaluation is that its own solution has been adopted.

    • eljay on September 11, 2019, 1:12 pm

      || Nathan: Throughout the years, I read the Mondoweiss website, and it’s rather clear that its position is the one-state solution. … ||

      One-state, not one-supremacist-state.

      || … So it’s quite surprising to read an article here that complains about the supposed consensus in Israel of reaching a one-state outcome. … ||

      The supposed consensus in Israel is one-supremacist-state, not one-state.

      || … Surely, there should be some consistency in the “party line” here. If Mondoweiss really supports the idea of the one-state, then there should be some enthusiasm in the above article that the Israelis have adopted the outlook of Mondoweiss. … ||

      If Israelis have in fact adopted the outlook of Mondoweiss, I agree that there should be some enthusiasm here. But they haven’t so, understandably, there isn’t.

      || … Alas, it turns out that this website doesn’t support finding a solution at all – even if its evaluation is that its own solution has been adopted. ||

      This website does not support finding a solution that involves a supremacist state – and it has correctly evaluated that a one-supremacist-state solution is not its own one-state solution.

      || … no one should take seriously any declaration made in the heat of an election … ||

      No-one should take seriously a Zionist (comment) comprised of two short and (deliberately?) inaccurate paragraphs.

      • Misterioso on September 12, 2019, 9:50 am

        @eljay

        BINGO!!!

    • bcg on September 11, 2019, 1:58 pm

      @Nathan: Can you tell us what solution you support?

    • James Canning on September 12, 2019, 12:26 pm

      Nathan, do you endorse the Bantustan strategy? (Non-Jews living in areas “annexed” by Israel will not be allowed Israeli citizenship.)

  3. James Canning on September 12, 2019, 12:18 pm

    Israel can purport to annex portions of the occupied West Bank (and Golan Heights), contrary to international law. The question will be how much pressure the Israel lobby will be able to bring on the US subsequently, so that it tries to compel other countries to accept Israel’s violations of international law.

  4. brent on September 12, 2019, 11:55 pm

    Gideon Levy points out the obvious. It already is one state and now the question has become what kind of governance should there be. It has to be determined how to become a secular state with respect for minority interests and rights, without discrimination under the law as Palestinian liberators first envisioned. Hopefully, Mondoweiss will be helpful with this.

    • Mooser on September 13, 2019, 12:32 pm

      “It already is one state and now the question has become what kind of governance should there be”

      Which governmental and legal changes will be adjudicated, by-golly-gee-whillikers under the august provisions (it might have been a different month) of Israel’s Constitution, and “Nation-State Law”?

    • Mooser on September 13, 2019, 12:36 pm

      “It already is one state…”

      So Israel can dispense with International Law? And you think it’s own laws can be appealed to for “minority rights and interests”?

      Love the way you stick that “minority” in there, too.

    • James Canning on September 13, 2019, 5:02 pm

      @brent: Will Israel annex areas of the West Bank with too many non-Jews? I very much doubt it.

      • echinococcus on September 14, 2019, 12:14 am

        What’s there to doubt, Canning? The Zionist entity has always done
        just that: annex areas with “too many non-Jews”, then chase, deport or eliminate them, so they end up not being many and sometimes not even few. Why not this time?

    • Mooser on September 14, 2019, 4:33 pm

      ” It has to be determined how to become a secular state with respect for minority interests and rights, without discrimination under the law as Palestinian liberators first envisioned” “Brent”

      OMFG. Don’t worry “Brent”, there’s very little possibility the Palestinians will discriminate against the Jews in Israel.

  5. Ossinev on September 13, 2019, 2:14 pm

    @Nathan
    “Throughout the years, I read the Mondoweiss website, and it’s rather clear that its position is the one-state solution. One reads again and again that the two-state solution is “dead”.”

    Dead ? LOL. It was never alive. The pretense of a 2SS was an ongoing con job perpetrated by ZIO governements of every shade or hue to keep those pesky Arabs in check and to fool the International Community. They were facilitated in allowing the ruse to continue by the Vichy self serving collaborators in the PA.

    Now it is unravelling and the only thing which is stopping it from imploding completely is the ongoing collaboration of Abbas,Erekat et al who really don`t give a toss about their fellow Palestinians and care only about retaining the perks of being “international statesmen”.

    Sooner rather than later the younger generation of Palestinians will grab the keys from their grubby hands and hand them back to the Zios.

    And afterwards:
    1) Stage 1 – a single blatantly Apartheid Zio state. No tricks or ruses to hide that reality from the International Community
    2) Stage 2 – South Africa revisited = full scale International Pariah status leading to BDS by the International Community inc companies , sporting bodies , cultural bodies etc. Not forgetting full scale loathing of everything and anything Israeli by ordinary people in the West with Zios having no fallback defense of alleged “Anti – Semitism”.
    3 ) Mass emigration by panicked “secular Israelis” to Western countries leaving a rump of unhinged Zealots running the colony alongside whats left of the sensible “left” trying desperately to prevent not least 4)
    4) Economic implosion.
    5) Either by force or persuasion Palestinians (just like native South Africans ) gaining equal rights in whatever the inevitable single state has become or is subsequently named.

    And the long suffering eternally victimised (sob) Zios have only got their racist arrogant selves to blame. Chickens/roost.

Leave a Reply