Palestinian prisoner Khalil Awawdeh ended his hunger strike on Wednesday after 182 days on strike, in protest of his open-ended detention in Israeli prison.
Awawdeh announced that he was ending his strike from his hospital bed in the Shamir Medical Center in central Israel, sending his salutations to the Palestinian people before he sipped a cup of tea – his first non-water drink in 182 days.
In a video that’s been widely shared on social media, an emaciated and breathless Awawdeh told the camera: “Thank you for your support, thank you everyone. You are a great people. And this is a just cause.”
In another video announcing the end of his strike, Awawdeh said: “This is a resounding victory, and it is a continuation of the great victories achieved by great and honorable people from this nation.”
“I am deeply thankful for people who supported me, stood with me, reinforced me, and prayed for me, thank you,” he said, adding that he will remain in hospital for treatment until his release on October 2.
According to Haaretz, Egyptian authorities played a central role in arranging Awawdeh’s release, which was reportedly a condition of the Egyptian-brokered ceasefire that ended Israel’s deadly three-day offensive on Gaza in early August.
Haaretz also quoted an Israeli security official, who said Awawdeh signed that he will not return to “terrorist activities” as a condition of his release, and that Israel “will release him as long as there is no reason to believe otherwise.”
The Palestinian Islamic Jihad movement hailed the news of Awawdeh’s release agreement, saying the “historic campaign he led will be recorded in the annals of Palestinian struggle.”
A video of Awawdeh’s mother celebrating the news of her son’s release spread widely on social media. In the video she can be seen talking to Awawdeh on Facetime and excitedly jumping up and down.
“We are so happy, we can’t describe it,” Awawdeh’s father, Mohammed Awawdeh, told Mondoweiss. “For months we waited anxiously to receive terrible news. We thought that Khalil was going to die.”
“But now we can feel some relief to know that he will be with us again soon, alive.”
Administrative detention
Awawdeh was arrested from his home in the middle of the night by armed Israeli soldiers on December 27th, 2021. Following his arrest he was given a six-month administrative detention order.
Three months into his detention, on March 3rd, he announced that he was going on hunger strike in protest of his detention. When the first administrative detention order expired in June, more than three months into his hunger strike, the court renewed it for another four months.
Administrative detention is a policy used by the Israeli government, almost exclusively against Palestinians in the occupied Palestinian territory, to imprison Palestinians deemed as “threats” by the Shin Bet, Israel’s internal intelligence agency, without charge or trial.
The policy allows the Shin Bet and Israel’s military prosecutor to present secret evidence against Palestinian “suspects” to an Israeli military judge, who can then impose administrative detention orders that are renewable indefinitely.
Under the policy, Palestinian administrative detainees are never formally charged with a crime, and are not privy to the alleged secret evidence being used against them. Some prisoners spend years in Israeli prisons under the policy, which has been widely condemned by rights groups and human rights experts.
“It is a cruel, inhumane, and unjust policy,” Mohammed Awawdeh told Mondoweiss.
“Whenever the Shabak (Shin Bet) agent decides that he wants to imprison my son, he can do so without any evidence or any reason. He does it just because he can,” Mohammed said.
Awawdeh, who is 41 and a father of four young girls, has spent more than 13 years in Israeli prisons across several stints. According to his father, three of those stints, amounting to more than five years in prison, were spent under administrative detention.
“It’s an oppressive policy, and it needs to end,” he said. “The world needs to fight against this oppression, and the apartheid system that is being used on us Palestinians.”
According to prisoner’s rights group Addameer, there are currently 670 Palestinians being held in Israeli prisons under administrative detention.
Hunger strike
Photos of a frail Awawdeh shocked the world earlier this week, as images of his bones protruding from his skinny frame spread across social media.
Over the course of his strike, Awawdeh lost more than half his body weight, his family said, as he refused all forms of food and medically-administered vitamins and nutrients, surviving on only water.
When he began his strike he weighed close to 190 pounds. Today, he weighs in at around 75 pounds, and suffers from severe pain, weakness, and cognitive and vision loss.
“I can’t describe how I feel, seeing the state my son is in. He has become skin and bones,” Mohammed Awawdeh told Mondoweiss. “He has suffered tremendously, and it will take a long time for him to recover his health.”
Mohammed said that as much as it hurt him to see his son suffer, he was proud of him for his “strong willpower” and for “struggling for justice.”
Hunger strikes have been used as a form of peaceful protest by Palestinian political prisoners as early as the 1960s, in order to challenge the inhuman conditions and policies imposed on them inside Israeli jails.
The practice became more common in its use to protest administrative detention in the 1990s, according to Addameer, and in 2012, a mass hunger strike by more than 200 prisoners successfully limited Israel’s use of the policy, though it was only temporary. Another mass hunger strike in protest of administrative detention was launched in 2014 and yielded similar results.
On Thursday September 1st, just a hours after Awawdeh ended his strike, Palestinian prisoners launched a collective open hunger strike in protest of Israeli Prison Services’ (IPS) re-institution of a series of collective, punitive, and retaliatory measures against Palestinian prisoners.
1 of 2
Israel is worried about a possible Clash with Washington over the Iran Nuclear Deal (juancole.com)
“Israel is worried about a possible Clash with Washington over the Iran Nuclear Deal” Middle East Monitor, by Adnan Abu AmerMIDDLE EAST MONITOR 09/01/2022
“As the countdown begins for the signing of a nuclear agreement between Iran & world powers, a number of disputes have surfaced between Israel & the US about the deal. There is also criticism within Israel of the government’s political & military approach towards the agreement. The occupation state appears to be opposing the whole world, which has more or less united to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions through diplomatic means, while Israel foolishly sticks to the punishment approach.
“In a step devoid of political wisdom, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tried to prevent the signing of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal agreed by the administration of then US President Barack Obama. Netanyahu arrived in Washington on the eve of the signing ceremony & delivered a speech in the US Congress against the deal behind Obama’s back. Obama did not hesitate to describe him as ungrateful. In the end, Netanyahu returned empty handed while the agreement was signed.
“The strange thing is that current Prime Minister Yair Lapid is now following in Netanyahu’s footsteps. His National Security Adviser, Eyal Kholta, has arrived in Washington for talks at the White House during which he will hear the details of the agreement before expressing Israel’s opposition. It is true that he will be briefed on the details closely, but he will not get what he wants. US President Joe Biden is determined to give Israel a second chance, which it will be a mistake to miss. Mossad spy chief David Barnea has also criticised the agreement, which is being seen as direct criticism of the Biden administration.
“Meanwhile, more Israelis are calling for a different policy on the Iran nuclear issue. Automatic opposition to any agreement, coupled with angry rhetoric and an attack on Iran, may earn Brownie points within certain sections of the Israeli electorate, but it brings Tehran closer to deciding to arm itself with nuclear weapons, because it will be the one to decide whether there will be a renewable agreement with the global powers regarding the nuclear file.” (cont’d)
2 of 2
“Many Israelis believe the new agreement to be less useful than what was on the table earlier. The fact is that Israel can’t expect anything better. Iran has made great progress in the production of centrifuges, & is able to enrich uranium faster than before. Israeli policy has played an important part in reaching this bleak situation. It began with Netanyahu’s direct attack on Obama, and he continued to push Trump to withdraw from the agreement — which he did in 2018 — even though Iran had fulfilled its part of the terms.
“Israelis are afraid of reproducing Netanyahu’s opposition to the nuclear agreement to the point of starting a crisis with Biden, which could cost Israel a lot. The current agreement, even if Israel sees it as bad, is better than no agreement at all, because Israel’s current policy is pushing Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. Tel Aviv needs to think seriously about a change of policy.
“A nuclear Iran is apparently a serious threat to Israel, because it will open the regional nuclear arms race even wider. This will require an examination of every step that Iran takes when looking at other conflict zones. Israelis recall that the late Mossad chief Meir Dagan said, “Forcefully preventing Iran’s bomb cannot be achieved by Israel alone; it requires international preparation.”
“All of this confirms that Israel is facing a complex situation, which has prompted its military & security leaders to ask the politicians & government to coordinate their activities with other countries, notably the US, as well as with their regional partners. The idea must be to create checks and balances against Iranian interests in various places, and to stop believing blindly that the only solution is Israel’s military power. Such a belief means, in short, bringing Iran closer to having nuclear weapons.
“Israelis are now talking about the conflicting interests of the US & Israel in the nuclear agreement to be signed. This requires the latter to find a way to act without necessarily causing a clash between Lapid & Biden. Netanyahu clashed with Obama, causing relations to deteriorate dramatically.
“Although not much is known about the details of the new nuclear agreement, it is clear that it is already much weaker than the original JCPOA signed by Obama, according to Israeli estimates. If implemented, the deal will limit Iran’s ability to enrich uranium even more than the original agreement..”