News

UN officials denounce Israel’s “illegal and unacceptable” war on Palestinian civil society

UN official Mary Lawlor calls Israeli attacks on Palestinian human rights organizations an "atrocity." "It's as simple as that," Lawlor tells Mondoweiss, "Israel does not want human rights defenders documenting and publicizing the attacks and injustice done to the Palestinians. So, this is their tactic."

Following the Israeli military raid on the offices of seven Palestinian human rights groups in the wee hours of August 18, their ransacking, the theft of their property and files and the sealing of their doors, twenty-five UN “Independent Experts” issued a declaration condemning “Israel’s escalating attacks against Palestinian civil society.”

“These actions amount to severe suppression of human rights defenders and are illegal and unacceptable,” the August 24 declaration stated, calling on UN member states “to take effective measures afforded by international law to put an end to these abuses.”

Mondoweiss spoke with two of the authors of the declaration.

Francesca Albanese is the “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967.” She took over the unpaid post on May 1, succeeding Canadian law professor Michael Lynk.

Mary Lawlor has served as “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders” since May 2020.

Defending human rights and rights defenders in occupied Palestine is a challenging task. Israel doesn’t cooperate with UN Special Rapporteurs or other Independent Experts. It doesn’t answer their letters and it doesn’t let them enter the effectively annexed Palestinian territories.

And the Israel government is currently refusing to renew the visas of international staff at the Palestine office of the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights.

Shortly after the start of her tenure as Special Rapporteur, Albanese asked to meet with Israel’s permanent mission in Geneva. Her request was declined. Her communications with the Israeli government — individually and along with other Special Rapporteurs — have not been answered.

“This non-engagement is more than regrettable,” Albanese told Mondoweiss. “I do hope and expect that the government of Israel will engage with me. If not, at least it will not hamper my work.”

Francesca Albanese
Francesca Albanese

Albanese has had lots on her mind. On May 4, the Israeli High Court ruled that occupation forces had the right to displace twelve hundred people, including 500 children, from Massafer Yatta (the “largest incidence of forcible transfer since 1967,” says Albanese). Seven days after that ruling, an Israeli sniper gunned down Shireen Abu Akleh.

Mary Lawlor has written ten formal letters to Israel regarding Palestinian human rights groups targeted by Israel. She has received no response.

“It’s very difficult to have impact on the Israelis because of their non-engagement,” says Lawlor.

Mary Lawlor
Mary Lawlor (Photo: OHCHR)

Lawlor refers to Israel’s August 18 raid on the offices of the six groups declared to be “terrorist” back in October, and of a seventh group, the Palestinian Health Work Committees — “seven reputable, credible human rights organizations” — as an “atrocity, for want of a better word,” and the administrative detention of rights defenders like Salah Hammouri as an “awful scourge.”

Hammouri, a Palestinian-French human rights lawyer and field researcher for the Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association – one of The Six – has been in and out of Israeli jails since 2005, including a year under “administrative detention,” without charge and based on secret evidence.

In early March, Hammouri was placed under administrative detention once again. On September 4, the day before his scheduled release from a second three-month round of detention, the Israeli military issued a third.

Like most of Israel’s Palestinian prisoners, the 37-year-old father of two is currently incarcerated inside the Green Line, in breach of Article 76 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

And, although Hammouri was born in Jerusalem, in October 2021, the Israel’s Ministry of Interior revoked his Jerusalem residency, for “breach of allegiance” to the State of Israel.

“Israel cannot compel the occupied population … to swear allegiance to it,” Francesca Albanese told Mondoweiss, “because Israel, under international law, is the hostile power, occupying power.”

Lawlor and others, including the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, have communicated with Israel about Hammouri on multiple occasions. Israel has not responded.

Salah Hammouri’s case is emblematic of international indifference to Israeli human rights violations, says Albanese. In spite of his French citizenship, Hammouri has received no effective support from the French government. Indeed, Hammouri was transferred to Hadarim maximum security prison, inside the Green Line, after Hammouri published an apparently fruitless open letter to French president Emmanuel Macron.

Likewise, Albanese points out, the US government has failed to hold Israel accountable for its travel ban on US citizen Ubai Al-Aboudi, director of the Bisan Center for Research and Development, one of the seven groups raided on August 18, and for the murder of Palestinian-American Shireen Abu Akleh.

The indifference of the ‘international community’ to the plight of Palestinian human rights groups flies in the face of the 1998 UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders and treaty law Israel has acceded to, Francesca Albanese and Mary Lawlor told Mondoweiss.

Lawlor rattles off provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR) pertaining to human rights defenders that Israel routinely breaches: freedom of expression and opinion and of peaceful assembly (Article 21), freedom of association (Article 22) and the right to participate in public life (Article 25).

Although Israel is a signatory to the CCPR, it insists the Covenant only applies in its own sovereign territory, therefore not in the occupied West Bank. It takes the same position on the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Israel does extend Covenant protections to Jewish residents of West Bank settlements.

While Albanese and Lawlor are pleased that nine EU member states have formally rejected Israel’s charges of “terrorism” against the six Palestinian rights groups, they don’t feel this is enough.

“As far the nine states are concerned, of course, it is very good that they have come out, but they really have to use more leverage to stop these aggressive attacks and to get this designation of terrorist rescinded,” says Lawlor. “And they also have to put in place proper political and financial support, so that these people can continue to work.”

And, Lawlor adds, “One centimeter of the US is worth more than a meter of the EU.”

Short of punitive measures the US and EU are unlikely to impose, Israel will continue to suppress Palestinian human rights groups.

And, charges of “terrorist” affiliation are just a smokescreen, Albanese and Lawlor say.

“This is a tool that powers in a dominant position use to advance repression of the subjugated population,” Albanese told Mondoweiss. “We shouldn’t forget that even Nelson Mandela was considered a terrorist in apartheid South Africa.”

Does Israel practice apartheid? Yes, says Albanese. “It’s fully documented that Israel has been practicing the crime of apartheid in the occupied Palestinian territory, and over the Palestinians, more broadly.”

“The objective is to neutralize their work, stop their work and cut off their funding . . . Israel does not want human rights defenders working and documenting and publicizing the attacks and injustice done to the Palestinians.”

Mary Lawlor

“I think the objective is to neutralize their work, stop their work and cut off their funding,” says Lawlor. “It’s as simple as that. Israel does not want human rights defenders working and documenting and publicizing the attacks and injustice done to the Palestinians. So, this is their tactic.”

Israel’s relentless assault on Palestinian rights groups also seems to be aimed at thwarting the International Criminal Court’s interminable and opaque Palestine investigation. Palestinian groups are collecting evidence. At least one member of The Six, Al-Haq director Shawan Jabarin, has met with the ICC’s Chief Prosecutor.

By seizing office files, computers and thumb drives, says Albanese, Israel appears to be violating Article 70(1)(c) of the ICC’s Rome Statute, which prohibits “retaliating against a witness for giving testimony or destroying, tampering with or interfering with the collection of evidence.”

Likewise, says Lawlor, the planting of Pegasus spyware on the phones of Salah Hammouri and other Palestinian human rights defenders places them and their clients in danger.

Do Palestinians and their civil society groups have the right to resist all these acts of Israeli repression? Yes, Francesca Albanese told Mondoweiss, “because they are a population under a prolonged and unlawful occupation.”

“The Palestinian people have the right of self-determination, which is ultimately the right to exist as a people, and also the right to resist, as a people,” says Albanese.

“What are the means for the Palestinians to resist the occupation? First and foremost, international law … And the Palestinians, frankly, over time, have resorted to peaceful resistance, legal resistance. Look at the work of the six NGOs! And even that is impossible to protect. This is a dangerous signal that we’re sending to the Palestinians under occupation.”

“In order to keep an entire people under occupation for 55 years,” says Albanese, “you need a lot [of] violence, because you’re repressing their rights every day, and of course this will trigger violence in response. There is only one way to bring peace to that place, and it’s by ensuring freedom. We get to freedom through complying with international law.”

7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

If a country that was not the forever friend of America and Canada, what do you think those governments would say?
If it were Jews who were the victims of these attacks, what would the Zionists say?

The Israelis know they don’t have to kill all the Palestinians to destroy them as a people. (Well, they couldn’t get away with killing them all.) Destroying civil society will do the job.

This will leave Israel (and the US, EU, and NATO) no choice but to declare the UN a terrorist organization.

Just received from Canada:
1 of 2
York School Board: Jewish and Palestinian Families Come Together to Stop Vote on Controversial Antisemitism Definition – Independent Jewish Voices Canada (ijvcanada.org)
Sept.14/2022, IJV, Canada
“York School Board: Jewish & Palestinian Families Come Together to Stop Vote on Controversial Antisemitism Definition””Independent Jewish Voices Canada (IJV) commends trustees of the York Region District School Board (YRDSB – Ontario’s third largest school board) for heeding the concerns of anti-racist parents & community members, & voting to indefinitely postpone a vote to adopt the dangerous & highly controversial International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) antisemitism definition.
“Far from protecting Jewish students, the IHRA definition has a proven track record of being used to silence Palestinian narratives, & for branding legitimate criticism of Israeli government policies as antisemitic. As soon as the community got word of the YRDSB vote on the matter, an ad-hoc coalition of Jews, Muslims, Palestinians & families from all walks of life came together to mobilize against it. During the YRDSB meeting on September 13th, it was revealed that over 500 emails were sent to YRDSB trustees on the motion, with two thirds writing to oppose the IHRA definition. This is an immense organizing victory, & shows us the power we have when we come together. The pro-Israel lobby pushed hard to have this definition adopted, which would have surely sown more division within the York region.
“While the IHRA definition has been adopted as part of the federal government’s anti-racism strategy & by a small handful of provinces (though never through an open legislative process), it has also been decisively rejected by city councils in Montreal, Vancouver & Calgary, as well as by the Canadian Association of University Teachers & the University of Toronto. Kenneth Stern, the man who wrote the definition itself, has cautioned against the definition being adopted in academic spaces.” (cont’d)

2 of 2
“With the vote on the IHRA definition indefinitely postponed, we urge YRDSB to take the time to carefully consider their approach to fighting antisemitism. There are several better definitions of antisemitism to chose from which don’t conflate antisemitism with legitimate criticism of Israel and Zionism, including IJV’s own antisemitism definition, the Jerusalem Declaration and the Nexus Document. The YRDSB should indeed seek out effective tools to combat antisemitism. To that end, we urge them to learn from our Principles to Dismantle Antisemitism.
“Antisemitism must be fought, but not by targeting those who simply advocate for Palestinian human rights. IJV thanks YRDSB trustees for hearing our voices, and we urge them to reject this definition should it ever come up for a vote again.” Media contact: Aaron Lakoff, IJV Communications and Media Lead, 514-317-6288, aaron@ijvcanada.org

For the record:
Historian Rosemarie M. Esber: “Zionist Jewish military organizations forced more than 400,000 Palestinian Arab inhabitants from their homes in about 225 villages, towns & cities in Palestine” before 14 May 1948 (Under the Cover of War: The Zionist Expulsion of the Palestinians, Arabicus Books & Media, LLC, 2009). 

Lest there be any doubt as to the number of Palestinians driven out of their country by the Haganah/Irgun & Stern Gang during the six months following passage of the United Nations Partition Plan (known as the ‘first wave’ of refugees), I refer to a report prepared by the Israeli Defence Forces Intelligence Branch (SHAI) dated 30 June 1948. Known as ‘The Arab Exodus from Palestine in the Period 1/12/47 to 1/6/48,’ its authors estimated that as of June 1/48 the number of Palestinian refugees totalled at least 391,000 (Palumbo, The Palestinian Catastrophe, p.120) & they concluded that ’70 per cent of the refugees had abandoned their homes at the time of the first wave (up until 1 June 1948) because of hostile acts committed by the Haganah, Irgun & the Stern group [i.e., the massacre & atrocities at Deir Yassin].” (Amnon Kapeliouk, “New Light on the Israeli-Arab Conflict and the Refugee Problem and its Origins,” Journal of Palestinian Studies, Vol. XVI, No.3, Spring 1987, p. 17)  

Land ownership in West & East Jerusalem in 1947: The total land area of West Jerusalem (the New City) was 19,331 dunams (about 4,833 acres) of which 40% was owned by Palestinian Muslims & Christians, 26.12 % by Jews & 13.86% by others, including Christian communities. Government & municipal land made up 2.90% & roads & railways 17%.
East Jerusalem (the Old City) consisted of 800 dunams (about 200 acres) of which 5 dunams (just over one acre) were Jewish owned & the remaining 795 dunams were owned by Palestinian Muslims & Christians. (“Assessing Palestinian Property in the City,” by Dalia Habash & Terry Rempel, Jerusalem 1948: The Arab Neighbourhoods & their Fate in the War, pp. 184-85)