Opinion

Greenblatt scolds the anti-Zionist children

Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL says anti-Zionism is antisemitism, and his speech has a strategic goal: make sure that Democratic Party doesn't accept the growing number of human rights reports accusing Israel of apartheid.

Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL gave an important speech last weekend in which he proclaimed, Anti-zionism is antisemitism, as dangerous to Jews as white supremacy, and named as outright antisemites three “radical” pro-Palestinians groups, Students for Justice in Palestine, Jewish Voice for Peace, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), as well as the Palestinian writer Mohammed El-Kurd.

What did they do wrong? The “negation of another people, a concept as alien to the modern discourse as white supremacy,” Greenblatt said. “We must act against the antizionist extremists just as we have against other extremists from the white supremacists and alt-right ilk who murder Jews.”

The speech was pervaded by a sense that U.S. Jews are in terrible danger. Greenblatt cites a recent report by the ADL that shows antisemitic incidents spiking yet again to unprecedented levels– a “surge in antisemitic violence that exploded across America during the conflict between Israel and the terror group Hamas in the spring.” The numbers “skyrocketed.”

It all seems crazy to me. Unprecedented violence? I live in Trump country and I don’t wear a yarmulke, but I don’t feel that foreboding myself, even as I worry about America coming apart at the seams.

But if Greenblatt is crazy, he’s crazy like a fox. This speech is strategic. Greenblatt has a big job; he is a four-star general in the Israel lobby’s war to preserve the special relationship. And he needs to counter Israel’s tanking reputation. There have been a wave of reports in the last year accusing Israel of apartheid, including from goldplated human rights organizations Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. Those reports could break into the mainstream; and Greenblatt, a former Obama aide and Starbucks executive who regularly gets time on the cable stations to talk about ending “systemic racism” and other evils, is waving the bloody flag of antisemitism to make sure that Congress and liberal media don’t go near the apartheid reports.

Greenblatt’s core audience is the political establishment and the Jewish establishment. He is trying to raise money from his supporters, and make sure that Democratic Party leaders marginalize “those in their party who knowingly traffic in antizionist tropes and make malicious claims against the Jewish state,” as he puts it. Remember that the Israel lobby was able to purge Israel critics in the UK Labor Party.

Though most of the groups he attacks are non-Jewish or Muslim, Greenblatt is also taking a leadership role in the war inside the Jewish community over Israel. Greenblatt is as aware as I am about the growing anti-Zionism in Jewish youth. Surveys consistently show that 20 percent of young Jews don’t believe in a Jewish state; even the American Jewish Committee says so. Fully a quarter of all Jews say that Israel is an apartheid state, but the number goes up to 38 percent of those under 40.

A few years ago David Harris of the American Jewish Committee gave an agonized speech about the wayward Jewish youth at a Westchester temple. He cried out, “Where did we go wrong in our homes and our schools,” that these kids are listening to anti-Israel arguments on campus and don’t see what a miracle Israel is? “To me it’s extraordinarily painful,” Harris said.

Greenblatt is tougher and colder than David Harris. He is going on the offensive, he’s willing to pile up bodies of bad Jews. He is saying, We’ve gone too easy on these young rebels, I’m doubling down, we’re not giving an inch.

Does Greenblatt actually think he can stem the tide? Certainly he can slow it down. His speech will be read in synagogues. Jewish scolding works. I’ve written about my own inability to explore anti-Zionism for many years because of the pressures of my community, till it became too much, at the tender age of 50! Later my mother told me my work was “vile” and her best friend Golda in Jerusalem told me my writing made her sick and I was only doing it because I hadn’t worked out my father issues and my literary career was a failure. I felt guilty about being such a fuckup. The handwringing never really stops! There is a long tradition of excommunicating heretical Jews– and given the smallness of the community, Jews are sensitive to this. Young Jews from Open Hillel seemed afraid of me when I interviewed them years ago, and progressive Zionists at Princeton took over a talk I was giving about Palestinian solidarity to anatomize my alleged antisemitism.

And still the numbers of young Jewish anti-Zionists grows. The Harvard Crimson just came out for BDS and the Jewish chairperson of the paper’s editorial board, Orlee Marini-Rapoport, celebrated the editorial on twitter.

Which brings us back to surges in violence. The Harvard editors were moved, they said, by how violent life is for Palestinians. Israel has killed hundreds of Palestinians in occupied territory in the last year, including scores of children.

Greenblatt’s speech doesn’t even acknowledge what life is like for Palestinians under Israeli rule and occupation. His entire speech is an angry attempt to change the subject. Joe Biden is going to Israel in late June, and Greenblatt wants to make sure that Joe Biden doesn’t dare put pressure on Israel.

We’re likely to see more such blunt attacks on anti-Zionism. Rep. Ted Deutch auditioned for his new job at the American Jewish Committee by accusing Rep. Rashida Tlaib, Muslim Democratic colleague, of antisemitism because she dared to quote from the apartheid reports. Mark Mellman is a principal of the Democratic Majority for Israel, whose raison d’etre is smearing progressives as haters.

It is not purely cynical. These execs are ardent Zionists, they believe in the historical need for a Jewish state. Like a lot of Jews older than themselves, they really still see Israel as a miraculous deliverance of the Jewish people in the 20th century after what Greenblatt calls our “vast history” of persecution; and they are able to blind themselves to the enormous price Palestinians have paid. A form of systemic racism they would never tolerate here.

Israel can’t help itself. Its inability to do anything to lift the occupation, its ever-more-rightward shifts as the nation state of the Jewish people — assure that young people will keep turning into anti-Zionists.

So I’m grateful for Greenblatt’s speech. He wants to force the issue. But young people who hear this speech will just want to read Mohammed El-Kurd.

Thanks to Adam Horowitz and Michael Arria

 

6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

1 of 2

Blatant Display of Hypocrisy | Al Mayadeen English

By eminent Palestinian leader, Madam Samia-Nasir Khoury, May 2/22
BRIEF EXCERPT:
“Despite regularly calling for peace, the Israeli occupation’s actions speak otherwise. From the non-stop aggressions it continues to commit against the Palestinian people to the refusal to make the slightest concession, the occupation seems to understand only the language of force.

“Never has the glaring double standards & hypocrisy of the international community been so exposed as it has been during the invasion of Ukraine, & especially for us Palestinians.

“The sight of the Ukrainian refugees evoked very sad memories of our own eviction from Palestine, which ceased to exist in 1948. Not only because of the eviction but because of the massacres & the razing of hundreds of villages & reducing leading cities into ghost towns, which took place at the time, so as to obliterate the history of our country, some of which were only made public many years later on by the Israeli new historians. It was a historical event known as “the Nakba” (Catastrophe), which turned out to be an ongoing Nakba to this day, as Israel, the occupying power, continues to deprive the Palestinians of their right of return according to UNGA resolution 194 on December 11, 1948, & refuses to withdraw from the rest of the Palestinian territory occupied in 1967 according to UN Security Council resolution 242 on November 22, 1967, over & above its daily violations of Palestinian human rights.” (cont’d)

2 of 2

“I am not going to dwell on the political atmosphere, & the role of the USA & NATO in provoking that war, but it had hardly started when the cry for sanctions on Russia was loud & clear. However, never did the international community come up with the word ‘sanctions’ regarding ‘Israel’, despite its brutal measures against the Palestinians as well as its flouting of UN resolutions for the last seven decades. It is high time ‘Israel’ realizes that it will never feel secure while it continues to kill, confiscate, and deprive the Palestinians & the prisoners of their freedom & their basic human rights. Furthermore, it allows the settlers to terrorize the Palestinians in their towns, in their fields, vineyards, and olive groves, as well as in their holy places, all under the protection of the Israeli police force. In fact, three renowned organizations monitoring the region, Amnesty International, B’Tselem, & Human Rights Watch came to the conclusion in their reports recently, that ‘Israel’ is an apartheid state.”  

ardent Zionists…are able to blind themselves to the enormous price Palestinians have paid”

Yes, and continue to pay. The Palestinian people are the primary/perpetual targets/victims of Zionism but by no means it’s only victims. Think Egypt. Think Syria. Think Jordan. Think Lebanon. Think the United Nations. Think the American Constitution and domestic American politics. Think normal Jewish people. Think the Arab World. Think Islam. Think African liberation movements. Think the harm Zionism has done/does to the reputations of individuals, states and institutions. Think history. Think language.

Zionism is a universal threat, even unto Zionists and Israel.

Mr. Goldblatt is a paid hack who says what he is told to say and whose every word and act are performative. He is a loyal soldier in an ethnoreligious, irredentist movement that relies on deceit and opacity for its oxygen. If, as he claims, anti-Zionism is antisemitism it behooves him not merely to castigate those who oppose his movement but more importantly to argue the positives of Zionism and make the case for Zionism. The one thing Mr. Goldblatt and his Zionist cronies will never, ever do – in public at least – is admit that Zionism is misguided, unsustainable, and if trends among millenials and young Jews hold, doomed.

Domestic American Zionism has no interest in fighting an effective campaign to abolish antisemitism: Its goal is merely to appear to be combatting it. Zionism is not fueled by real, rational goals but rather by a desperate craving for power based on a claim to know the hearts of the people who animate BDS, SJP, JVP, Amnesty International, B’Tselem, and a host of other decent, moral, courageous people. It does not.

Zionism is as likely to prevail as the Confederate States of America, Imperial Japan’s Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere or Apartheid South Africa because systems built on inherently unjust foundations are unsustainable if history is to be believed.

Herzl said, relative to establishing the state of Israel: “If you will it, it is no dream.” Mr. Goldblatt still believes in Herzl’s rhetoric but he fails to understand that millions more believe his words apply to the establishment of the state of Palestine as well.

Q: Is it antisemitic according to IHRA to challenge Mr. Goldblatt’s assertions?

View 350 posters on Israeli Independence Day and 390 posters on The Palestinian Nakba/Catastrophe

I never realised that criticising tens of millions of Christian Zionists could be classed as “anti-semitism”!

The “negation of another people, a concept as alien to the modern discourse as white supremacy,” Greenblatt said.
Excuse me? Did a Zionist spokesman really accuse others of the “negation of another people”? Really?